汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2): 199-207.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2024.02.008
收稿日期:2023-07-12
修回日期:2024-01-04
出版日期:2024-04-30
发布日期:2024-04-27
通讯作者:
* 涂正凯,研究员。E-mail:tzklq@hust.edu.cn。
作者简介:关权(1999—),男(汉),湖北,硕士研究生。E-mail:2465233464@qq.com。
基金资助:
GUAN Quan1(
), TU Zhengkai2,*(
)
Received:2023-07-12
Revised:2024-01-04
Online:2024-04-30
Published:2024-04-27
摘要:
为了解决传统电动车续航焦虑的问题,对燃料电池观光车进行了功率匹配设计与仿真验证,提出了一种功率跟随型能量管理策略。对比了纯锂电池观光车(LI)、纯燃料电池观光车(FC)、LI 与FC的混合动力观光车(LI-FC)的输出特性,并仿真试验。结果表明:LI-FC的爬坡度与纯锂电池观光车不相上下,续航里程较纯锂电池观光车提升了15%,等效氢耗较纯锂电池观光车减少了53%,动力电池荷电状态(SOC)能保持在0.5~0.9之间稳定工作,燃料电池也会在额定工况与怠速工况下稳定切换。因此,燃料电池锂电池混合动力观光车具有这3种观光车中最优续航能力、较好的使用经济性、最好的使用稳定性,燃料电池与动力电池都能在期望工况下稳定工作,有较好的竞争力。
中图分类号:
关权, 涂正凯. 锂电池与燃料电池混合观光车动力系统的优化设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(2): 199-207.
GUAN Quan, TU Zhengkai. Optimal design of energy management system for hybrid sightseeing-bus with fuel-cells and lithium-batteries[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(2): 199-207.
| 整备质量,m0 | 0.800 t |
| LI车满载质量,m1 | 1.130 t |
| LIFC车满载质量,m2 | 1.093 t |
| FC车满载质量,m3 | 1.086 t |
| 迎风面积,A | 2.678 m2 |
| 风阻因数,CD | 0.60 |
| 滚动半径,r | 0.288 m |
| 滚动因数,f | 0.018 |
| 减速器传动比,i0 | 6 |
| 最大爬坡度 | 20% |
| 0~20 km/h加速时间 | 20 s |
| 1 km 最高车速 | 30 km/h |
| 30 min最高车速 | 25 km/h |
| 5%坡度最高车速 | 20 km/h |
| 整备质量,m0 | 0.800 t |
| LI车满载质量,m1 | 1.130 t |
| LIFC车满载质量,m2 | 1.093 t |
| FC车满载质量,m3 | 1.086 t |
| 迎风面积,A | 2.678 m2 |
| 风阻因数,CD | 0.60 |
| 滚动半径,r | 0.288 m |
| 滚动因数,f | 0.018 |
| 减速器传动比,i0 | 6 |
| 最大爬坡度 | 20% |
| 0~20 km/h加速时间 | 20 s |
| 1 km 最高车速 | 30 km/h |
| 30 min最高车速 | 25 km/h |
| 5%坡度最高车速 | 20 km/h |
| 观光车 电池 | P / kW | n / (r·min-1) | T / Nm | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 额定 | 峰值 | 额定 | 峰值 | 额定 | 峰值 | |||
| LI | 4.53 | 6.88 | 1 105 | 1 658 | 39.16 | 118.86 | ||
| LIFC | 4.39 | 6.65 | 1 105 | 1 658 | 37.93 | 114.98 | ||
| FC | 4.36 | 6.61 | 1 105 | 1 658 | 37.69 | 114.24 | ||
| 观光车 电池 | P / kW | n / (r·min-1) | T / Nm | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 额定 | 峰值 | 额定 | 峰值 | 额定 | 峰值 | |||
| LI | 4.53 | 6.88 | 1 105 | 1 658 | 39.16 | 118.86 | ||
| LIFC | 4.39 | 6.65 | 1 105 | 1 658 | 37.93 | 114.98 | ||
| FC | 4.36 | 6.61 | 1 105 | 1 658 | 37.69 | 114.24 | ||
| [1] | 邓媛媛. 低碳背景下新能源汽车行业可持续发展的战略思考[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2023, 26(2): 132-134. |
| DENG Yuanyuan. Strategic thinking on sustainable development of new energy automobile industry under the background of low carbon[J]. Chin Manag Info, 2023, 26(2): 132-134. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 梁士栋, 赵勍, 何建佳, 等. 共享充电桩下负荷时间分布均衡的小区电动汽车充电方案优化[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2022, 39(11): 3688-3700. |
| LIANG Shidong, ZHAO Qing, HE Jianjia, et al. Optimization of community electric vehicle charging schemes with balanced load time distribution under shared charging hubs[J]. Appl Res Computers, 2022, 39(11): 3688-3700. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | LU Qiang, ZHANG Bo, YANG Shichun, et al. Life cycle assessment on energy efficiency of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle in China[J]. Energy, 2022, 257: Paper No 124731. |
| [4] | Cieslik W, Antczak W. Research of load impact on energy consumption in an electric delivery vehicle based on real driving conditions: guidance for electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(2): Paper No 775. |
| [5] |
Wenlonga S, Xiaokaia C, Lub W. Analysis of energy saving and emission reduction of vehicles using light weight materials[J]. Energy Procedia, 2016, 88: 889-893.
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.106 URL |
| [6] | LI Qiang, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Cuixia, et al. Analysis method and case study of the lightweight design of automotive parts and its influence on carbon emissions[J]. Processes, 2022, 10: Paper No 2560. |
| [7] | HE Xiuhong, HU Yingying. Optimal mileage of electric vehicles considering range anxiety and charging times[J]. World Elec Vehi J, 2023, 14: Paper No 21. |
| [8] |
Madhusudhanan A K. A method to improve an electric vehicle's range efficient cruise control[J]. Euro J Control, 201, 48: 83-96.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2018.12.006 URL |
| [9] | HUANG Guoming, YUAN Xiaofang, SHI Ke, et al. A 3-D multi-object path planning method for electric vehicle considering the energy consumption and distance[J]. Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2022, 23(7): 7508-7520. |
| [10] | DAI Tianlu, ZHANG Zipeng, WANG Feifei, et al. Accuracy of range estimation of pure electric vehicles under compound conditions comparative analysis[C]// J Phys: Conf Series, 2020, 1634: Paper No 012012. |
| [11] |
Sajadi-Alamdaria S A, Voosa H, Darouachb M. Nonlinear model predictive control for ecological driver assistance systems in electric vehicles[J]. Robot Autonomous Syst, 2018, 112: 291-303.
doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2018.12.001 URL |
| [12] | Szumska M, Jurecki R. The analysis of energy recovered during the braking of an electric vehicle in different driving conditions[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(24): Paper No 9369. |
| [13] | LIU Hanwu, LEI Yulong, FU Yao, et al. Multi-objective optimization study of regenerative braking control strategy for range-extended electric vehicle[J]. Appl Sci, 2020, 10(5): Paper No 1789. |
| [14] | LI Wanmin, ZHAO Gengyun, ZHU Youdi, et al. Research on compound braking control strategy of extended-range electric vehicle based on driving intention recognition[J]. Comput Intel Neuroscience, 2022, 2022: Paper No 8382873. |
| [15] | LI Yongliang, ZHAO Changlu, HUANG Ying, et al. Study on regenerative braking control strategy for extended range electric vehicles[C]// IEEE Vehi Power Propu Conf, 2020: 1-6. |
| [16] | LIN Weiyi, ZHAO Han, ZHANG Bingzhan, et al. Predictive energy management strategy for range-extended electric vehicles based on ITS Information and start-stop optimization with vehicle velocity forecast[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(20): Paper No 7774. |
| [17] | SHI Dapai, LI Shipeng, LIU Kangjie, et al. Adaptive energy management strategy based on intelligent prediction of driving cycle for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle[J]. Processes, 2022, 10(9): Paper No 1831. |
| [18] | Adeleke O P, LI Yong, CHEN Qiang, et al. Torque distribution based on dynamic programming algorithm for four in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle considering energy efficiency optimization[J]. World Elec Vehi J, 2022, 13(10): Paper No 181. |
| [19] | XU Bing, LI Dongxu, MA Zheshu, et al. Thermodynamic optimization of a high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell for fuel cell vehicle applications[J]. Math, 2021, 9(15): 1792. |
| [20] | JIAO Mingyu, ZHU Haoran, HUANG Jinglong, et al. Numerical simulation of hydrogen leakage and diffusion process of fuel cell vehicle[J]. World Elec Vehi J, 2021, 12(4): Paper No 193. |
| [21] | ZHOU Anqi. Review of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle research[J]. Acad J Eng Tech Sci, 2022, 5(9): 51-56. |
| [22] | 汤世炎. 基于人工鱼群方法的燃料电池车能量分配优化[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳工业大学, 2021. |
| TANG Shiyan. Energy Allocation optimization of fuel cell vehicle based on artificial fish swarm method[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | DUAN Zhijie, MEI Nan, FENG Lili, et al. Research on hydrogen consumption and driving range of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle under the CLTC-P condition[J]. World Elect Vehi, 2022, 13(1): Paper No 9. |
| [24] | 徐乐鹏. 某燃料电池重卡动力系统参数匹配与能量管理策略研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学车辆工程, 2020. |
| XU Lepeng. Research on parameter matching and energy management strategy of a fuel cell heavy truck power system[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan Univ of Tech, 2020. (in Chinese) | |
| [25] | 孟翔. 小型燃料电池车研制与能量管理研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学电气工程, 2019. |
| MENG Xiang. Development and energy management research of a fuel cell vehicle[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong Univ, 2019. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 李钊, 隆武强, 田华. 甲醇—电力混合动力推进系统能量管理的优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2026, 17(1): 70-78. |
| [2] | 李钊, 隆武强, 田华. 复合储能式混合动力系统全局最优控制策略研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(6): 877-885. |
| [3] | 代立宏, 金妮妮, 莫宗华, 胡鹏, 万文俊, 刘浩业, 王天友. 基于分段SOC轨迹预测的PHEV分层能量管理策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(5): 736-746. |
| [4] | 杨建军, 柳东威, 李菁元, 柳邵辉, 张飞龙, 王梦渊. 混合动力汽车的道路预见性节能技术及一种测评方法[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(2): 268-276. |
| [5] | 安钟衍, 宋盼盼, 鲁振博, 郑思宇, 魏名山, 诸葛伟林, 张扬军. 电动汽车CO2空调涡旋压缩机变工况工作特性[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(4): 488-495. |
| [6] | 罗闯, 许亮. 基于ISSA的燃料电池多电源模糊能量管理策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(4): 496-504. |
| [7] | 孙超, 刘波, 孙逢春. 新能源汽车节能规划与控制技术研究综述[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(4): 593-616. |
| [8] | 尹燕莉, 张鑫新, 潘小亮, 詹森, 黄学江, 王福振. 基于等效因子的Q学习燃料电池汽车能量管理策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(4): 785-795. |
| [9] | 雍安姣, 项阳, 付永宏, 汪爽, 郭廷, 王勇. 搭配低温散热器的PHEV电池冷却系统的节能效果[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(4): 796-803. |
| [10] | 周泉, 张策腾飞, 李雁飞, 帅斌, 徐宏明. 基于数字孪生和PSO算法的混动车辆能量管理策略鲁棒优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(3): 517-525. |
| [11] | 宋波, 孙凯, 车志钊, 陈锐, 刘怀宇, 任美林, 王天友. 能量管理策略对燃料电池客车热管理系统性能的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(3): 526-534. |
| [12] | 李敏清, 冯坚, 韩志玉. 串联式和增程式混合动力轻型商用车的性能对比[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(3): 550-559. |
| [13] | 尹燕莉, 马永娟, 周亚伟, 王瑞鑫, 詹森, 马什鹏, 黄学江, 张鑫新. Markov 链与Q-Learning算法的超轻度混动汽车模型预测控制[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 557-569. |
| [14] | 刘建辉, 姚方方, 张彦. 混合动力汽车参数的交叉—变异蜂群算法优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(2): 186-192. |
| [15] | 王煜安, 罗佳鑫, 王亚超, 王欣, 葛蕴珊, 蒋震. 不同能量管理策略的增程电动汽车排放的实际道路试验[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(2): 219-225. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||