不同能量管理策略的增程电动汽车排放的实际道路试验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2021.02.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究增程式电动汽车在不同能量管理策略下对污染物排放的影响,对2辆增程式电动汽车在不同驾驶工况下进行了实际道路试验。对排放数据聚类得到瞬时高排放集合（IHES）,通过发动机转速、节气门开度等发动机参数对一氧化碳（CO）、细颗粒数量（PN）瞬时高排放的影响进行了分析。结果表明：能量管理策略会影响CO瞬时高排放的分布规律,相比于功率跟随策略,多点控制策略易使得车速处于高速阶段时产生CO瞬时高排放。不同驾驶行为不会对增程式电动汽车CO、PN瞬时高排放的分布规律造成明显影响,而拥堵路况下发动机冷却液温度相对低,再启动时产生了更多的PN瞬时高排放。

关键词: 增程式电动汽车, 污染物排放, 实际道路试验, 能量管理策略, 驾驶工况, 瞬时高排放集合(IHES)

Abstract:

Several real driving tests were done on different extended-range electric vehicles to investigate the influence of two kines of energy management strategies at two driving conditions on the emission from extended-range electric vehicles. The instantaneous high emission set (IHES) was obtained by clustering the emission data. The influence of internal parameters such as engine speed and throttle position on instantaneous high emission of carbon monoxide (CO) and particle number (PN) was analyzed. The experimental results show that energy management strategies can significantly affect the distribution regularity of instantaneous high CO emissions. Compared with the power following strategy, the multi-point control strategy produces instantaneous high CO emissions when the vehicle speed is high. Different driving behaviors have no significant influence on the distribution regularity of instantaneous high CO and PN emissions in extended-range electric vehicles. However, the engine coolant temperature is relatively low under congestion road conditions, resulting in more PN instantaneous high emissions during restart.

Key words: extented-range electric vehicle, pollutant emission, real driving test, energy management strategy, driving condition, instantaneous high emission set (IHES)

中图分类号:

U467.1+4

王煜安, 罗佳鑫, 王亚超, 王欣, 葛蕴珊, 蒋震. 不同能量管理策略的增程电动汽车排放的实际道路试验[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(2): 219-225.

WANG Yu’an, LUO Jiaxin, WANG Yachao, WANG Xin, GE Yunshan, JIANG Zhen. Real road tests of the emission from extended-range electric vehicles with different energy management strategies[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(2): 219-225.

图/表 12

参考文献 12

[1]	闵海涛, 叶冬金, 于远彬. 增程式电动汽车控制策略的优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2014,36(8):899-903.
	MIN Haitao, YE Dongjin, YU Yuanbin. Optimization of the control strategy for range extended electric vehicle[J]. Auto Engi, 2014,36(8):899-903. (in Chinese)
[2]	刘成祺, 解来卿, 樊月珍, 等. 某增程式电动汽车北方冬季工况下能耗测试与分析[J]. 汽车技术, 2016 (2):45-49.
	LIU Chengqi, XIE Laiqing, FAN Yuezhen, et al. Test and Analysis on Energy Consumption of A Rang Extended Electric Vehicle in Winter of Northern China[J]. Auto Tech, 2016 (2):45-49. (in Chinese)
[3]	Lijewski P, Kozak M, Fuć P, et al. Exhaust emissions generated under actual operating conditions from a hybrid vehicle and an electric one fitted with a range extender[J]. Transp Res Part D: Transp Envir, 2020,78:102183. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.012 URL
[4]	Saeed M, Andersson L. Real driving emissions (RDE) of a gasoline PHEV[D]. Goteborg: Chalmers University of Technology, 2018.
[5]	张运. 道路坡度与交通状况对轻型汽油车实际行驶排放的影响[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2019.
	ZHANG Yun. Impact of road grade and traffic condition on real driving emission of light-duty gasoline vehicles[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[6]	Mera Z, Fonseca N, López J M, et al. Analysis of the high instantaneous NOx emissions from Euro 6 diesel passenger cars under real driving conditions[J]. Appl Energy, 2019,242:1074-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.120 URL
[7]	WANG Yachao, WANG Junfang, HAO Chunxiao, et al. Characteristics of instantaneous particle number (PN) emissions from hybrid electric vehicles under the real-world driving conditions[J]. Fuel, 2021,286, 119466. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119466 URL
[8]	中华人民共和国环境保护部, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法(中国第六阶段):GB 18352.6-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2 016.
	Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Limits and measurement methods for emissions from light-duty vehicles (China 6): GB 18352.6-2016[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
[9]	沈望胜. 基于出行特征的增程式电动汽车能量管理策略研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2020.
	SHEN Wangsheng. Research on energy management strategy of extended-range electric vehicle based on trip characteristics[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[10]	Merkisz J, Pielecha J, Jasiński R. Remarks about real driving emissions tests for passenger cars[J]. Archives of Transport, 2016,39:51-63. doi: 10.5604/08669546 URL
[11]	毛德智. 基于改进PID与模糊算法的汽油机瞬态空燃比复合控制方法研究[D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2017.
	MAO Dezhi. Study on compound control method of gasoline engine transient air fuel ratio based on improved PID and fuzzy algorithm[D]. Changsha: Changsha University of Science & Technology, 2017. (in Chinese)
[12]	尹乾熙. 缸内直喷汽油机微粒捕集器捕集特性研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2015.
	YIN Qianxi. Research on the trap characteristics of gasoline particulate filers[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2015. (in Chinese)

	A车	B车
发动机排量/ L	1.5	1.2
供油方式	PFI	GDI
整备质量/ t	1.80	2.10
发动机额定功率/ kW	45	80
汽油机颗粒捕集器	否	是

	A车	B车
发动机排量/ L	1.5	1.2
供油方式	PFI	GDI
整备质量/ t	1.80	2.10
发动机额定功率/ kW	45	80
汽油机颗粒捕集器	否	是

试验名称	[va]_p-95	v		T	S
试验名称	m^-2·s^-3	km·h^-1		s	km
A_正常	11.6	47.8	5 611		74.5
A_激进	17.0	46.5	5 774		74.7
A_拥堵	11.8	35.8	7 522		74.7
B_正常	13.0	47.0	5 734		75.0
B_激进	17.8	47.6	5 691		75.2
B_拥堵	11.1	36.8	7 345		74.9

试验名称	[va]_p-95	v		T	S
试验名称	m^-2·s^-3	km·h^-1		s	km
A_正常	11.6	47.8	5 611		74.5
A_激进	17.0	46.5	5 774		74.7
A_拥堵	11.8	35.8	7 522		74.7
B_正常	13.0	47.0	5 734		75.0
B_激进	17.8	47.6	5 691		75.2
B_拥堵	11.1	36.8	7 345		74.9

能量管理	IHES排序/ %	正常驾驶		激进驾驶		拥堵驾驶
能量管理	IHES排序/ %	e(CO) / (mg·s^-1)	τ / %	e(CO) / (mg·s^-1)	τ / %	e(CO) / (mg·s^-1)	τ / %
A 车	20	68.8	0.6	44.3	0.8	58.2	0.7
	50	24.9	2.6	13.1	4.6	17.0	3.8
	80	7.1	8.8	4.5	15.2	5.9	12.8
B 车	20	15.0	1.9	17.8	1.2	20.4	1.2
	50	4.8	13.2	4.9	8.4	7.5	6.2
	80	2.4	36.2	2.0	28.3	2.0	21.7