Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 148-158.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2025.01.015
• Intelligent Driving and Intelligent Transportation • Previous Articles Next Articles
KUANG Xinghong(
), SHEN Jiacheng
Received:2024-03-12
Revised:2024-05-29
Online:2025-02-28
Published:2025-03-04
CLC Number:
KUANG Xinghong, SHEN Jiacheng. Improved Northern Goshawk Optimization Algorithm and its application in intelligent vehicle path planning[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(1): 148-158.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.journalase.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2025.01.015
| 算法 | 参数 |
|---|---|
| INGO | 黄金正弦初始值: a = -π,b = π 黄金正弦常数: |
| UNGO | μ~N(0, σμ2),v~N(0, σv2) |
| NGO | 攻击半径: R = 0.02×(1 - t/maxiter) |
| SSA | 预警值:ST = 0.6 发现者比例:PD = 0.7 警戒者比例:SD = 0.2 |
| WOA | 螺旋常数: ? = 1 行为选择概率: p = 0.5 |
| WSA | 梯度系数: ε = 10-6,步长系数: α0 = 0.3 |
| 算法 | 参数 |
|---|---|
| INGO | 黄金正弦初始值: a = -π,b = π 黄金正弦常数: |
| UNGO | μ~N(0, σμ2),v~N(0, σv2) |
| NGO | 攻击半径: R = 0.02×(1 - t/maxiter) |
| SSA | 预警值:ST = 0.6 发现者比例:PD = 0.7 警戒者比例:SD = 0.2 |
| WOA | 螺旋常数: ? = 1 行为选择概率: p = 0.5 |
| WSA | 梯度系数: ε = 10-6,步长系数: α0 = 0.3 |
| 函数 | 定义域 | 理论值 |
|---|---|---|
| [-10, 10] | 0 | |
| [-100, 100] | 0 | |
| [-100, 100] | 0 | |
| [-32, 32] | 0 |
| 函数 | 定义域 | 理论值 |
|---|---|---|
| [-10, 10] | 0 | |
| [-100, 100] | 0 | |
| [-100, 100] | 0 | |
| [-32, 32] | 0 |
| 函数 | 指标 | INGO | UNGO | NGO | SSA | WOA | WSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Max | 0.00E+00 | 1.44E-121 | 5.61E-45 | 2.77E-27 | 1.36E-17 | 1.28E-71 |
| Min | 0.00E+00 | 7.63E-128 | 2.34E-46 | 0.00E+00 | 2.92E-50 | 1.85E-75 | |
| Mean | 0.00E+00 | 1.16E-122 | 1.02E-45 | 9.23E-29 | 8.51E-17 | 1.02E-72 | |
| Std | 0.00E+00 | 3.52E-122 | 1.09E-45 | 5.05E-28 | 9.86E-17 | 2.41E-72 | |
| F2 | Max | 0.00E+00 | 6.01E-240 | 3.09E-23 | 1.58E-42 | 7.72E+04 | 2.67E-142 |
| Min | 0.00E+00 | 4.79E-255 | 4.12E-29 | 0.00E+00 | 3.13E+04 | 3.32E-152 | |
| Mean | 0.00E+00 | 3.90E-241 | 5.02E-24 | 5.27E-44 | 4.70E+04 | 1.23E-143 | |
| Std | 0.00E+00 | 0.00E+00 | 8.93E-24 | 2.88E-43 | 1.08E+04 | 5.08E-143 | |
| F3 | Max | 0.00E+00 | 6.07E-123 | 8.16E-37 | 5.10E-27 | 8.57E+01 | 1.44E-70 |
| Min | 0.00E+00 | 1.10E-133 | 1.00E-38 | 0.00E+00 | 1.16E+00 | 1.23E-80 | |
| Mean | 0.00E+00 | 2.46E-124 | 1.85E-37 | 1.70E-28 | 4.67E+01 | 4.87E-72 | |
| Std | 0.00E+00 | 1.12E-123 | 1.83E-37 | 9.31E-28 | 2.86E+01 | 2.63E-71 | |
| F4 | Max | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | 7.99E-15 | 8.88E-16 | 7.99E-15 | 8.88E-16 |
| Min | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | 4.44E-15 | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | |
| Mean | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | 6.80E-15 | 8.88E-16 | 3.61E-15 | 8.88E-16 | |
| Std | 0.00E+00 | 0.00E+00 | 1.70E-15 | 0.00E+00 | 2.22E-15 | 0.00E+00 |
| 函数 | 指标 | INGO | UNGO | NGO | SSA | WOA | WSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Max | 0.00E+00 | 1.44E-121 | 5.61E-45 | 2.77E-27 | 1.36E-17 | 1.28E-71 |
| Min | 0.00E+00 | 7.63E-128 | 2.34E-46 | 0.00E+00 | 2.92E-50 | 1.85E-75 | |
| Mean | 0.00E+00 | 1.16E-122 | 1.02E-45 | 9.23E-29 | 8.51E-17 | 1.02E-72 | |
| Std | 0.00E+00 | 3.52E-122 | 1.09E-45 | 5.05E-28 | 9.86E-17 | 2.41E-72 | |
| F2 | Max | 0.00E+00 | 6.01E-240 | 3.09E-23 | 1.58E-42 | 7.72E+04 | 2.67E-142 |
| Min | 0.00E+00 | 4.79E-255 | 4.12E-29 | 0.00E+00 | 3.13E+04 | 3.32E-152 | |
| Mean | 0.00E+00 | 3.90E-241 | 5.02E-24 | 5.27E-44 | 4.70E+04 | 1.23E-143 | |
| Std | 0.00E+00 | 0.00E+00 | 8.93E-24 | 2.88E-43 | 1.08E+04 | 5.08E-143 | |
| F3 | Max | 0.00E+00 | 6.07E-123 | 8.16E-37 | 5.10E-27 | 8.57E+01 | 1.44E-70 |
| Min | 0.00E+00 | 1.10E-133 | 1.00E-38 | 0.00E+00 | 1.16E+00 | 1.23E-80 | |
| Mean | 0.00E+00 | 2.46E-124 | 1.85E-37 | 1.70E-28 | 4.67E+01 | 4.87E-72 | |
| Std | 0.00E+00 | 1.12E-123 | 1.83E-37 | 9.31E-28 | 2.86E+01 | 2.63E-71 | |
| F4 | Max | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | 7.99E-15 | 8.88E-16 | 7.99E-15 | 8.88E-16 |
| Min | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | 4.44E-15 | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | |
| Mean | 8.88E-16 | 8.88E-16 | 6.80E-15 | 8.88E-16 | 3.61E-15 | 8.88E-16 | |
| Std | 0.00E+00 | 0.00E+00 | 1.70E-15 | 0.00E+00 | 2.22E-15 | 0.00E+00 |
| [1] | 何新易, 李扬帆. 信息化、数字化、智能化协同推进中国全面现代化[J]. 湖北省社会主义学院学报, 2023(3): 12-19. |
| HE Xinyi, LI Yangfan. Digitalization and intelligence collaborate to promote china's comprehensive modernization[J]. J Hubei Social Uni, 2023(3): 12-19. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] |
卢颖, 庞黎晨, 陈雨思, 等. 一种面向城市战的无人机路径规划群智能算法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S2): 146-156.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2023.0869 |
| LU Ying, PANG Lichen, CHEN Yusi, et al. An intelligent algorithm of UAV path planning group for urban warfare[J]. J Milit Eng, 2023, 44(S2): 146-156. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | 宋晓琳, 潘鲁彬, 曹昊天. 基于改进智能水滴算法的汽车避障局部路径规划[J]. 汽车工程, 2016, 38(2): 185-191,228. |
| SONG Xiaolin, PAN Lubin, CAO Haotian. Localized path planning for automobile obstacle avoidance based on improved intelligent water droplet algorithm[J]. Autom Engineerin, 2016, 38(2): 185-191, 228. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | LIAO Bin, WAN Fangyi, HUA Yi, et al. F-RRT*: An improved path planning algorithm with improved initial solution and convergence rate[J]. Expe Syst App, 2021, 184: 115457. |
| [5] | JIANG Haojie, SUN Yuan. Research on global path planning of electric disinfection vehicle based on improved A* algorithm[J]. Energy Report, 2021, 7(S7): 1270-1279. |
| [6] | Amylia A, Yassine M, Assia S, et al. An enhanced African Vulture Optimization Algorithm for solving the unmanned aerial vehicles path planning problem[J]. Comput Elect Eng, 2023, 110: 108802. |
| [7] | 葛唱, 钱素琴. 改进麻雀搜索算法的无人车路径规划[J]. 导航定位学报, 2022, 10(6): 107-111. |
| GE Chang, QIAN Suqin. Improved sparrow search algorithm for unmanned vehicle path planning[J]. J Navigat Posi, 2022, 10(6): 107-111. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | WANG Ziwei, SUN Guangkai, ZHOU Kangpeng, et al. A parallel particle swarm optimization and enhanced sparrow search algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicle path planning[J]. Heliyo, 2023, 9(4): e14784-e14784. |
| [9] | HAN Zengliang, CHEN Mou, ZHU Haojie, et al. Ground threat prediction-based path planning of unmanned autonomous helicopter using hybrid enhanced artificial bee colony algorithm[J]. Defen Tec, 2024, 32: 1-22. |
| [10] |
常见, 任雁. 基于改进遗传算法的机器人路径规划[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2023(2): 23-27.
doi: 10.13462/j.cnki.mmtamt.2023.02.006 |
| CHANG Jian, REN Yan. Robot path planning based on Improved Genetic Algorithm[J]. Combi Mach Tool Auto Proc Tec, 2023(2): 23-27. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | 赵杰, 王馨阳, 王贺. 改进遗传算法的救援机器人路径规划[J]. 黑龙江科技大学学报, 2022, 32(3): 393-400. |
| ZHAO Jie, WANG Xingyang, WANG He. Improved Genetic Algorithm for path planning of rescue robots[J]. J Heilongjiang Univ Sci Tec, 2022, 32(3): 393-394. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | Dehghani M, Hubalovsky S, Trojovsky P. Northern goshawk optimization: A new swarm-based algorithm for solving optimization problems[J]. IEEE Acces, 2021(9): 162059-162080. |
| [13] | FAN Yang, HONG Jiang, Lyu L. Multi-strategy fusion improved Northern Goshawk optimizer is used for engineering problems and UAV path planning[J]. Scientific Report, 2024, 14(1): 23300-23300. |
| [14] | Tanyildizi E, Demir G, et al. Golden Sine Algorithm: A Novel Math-Inspired Algorithm[J]. Advan Elect Comput Eng, 2017, 17(2): 71-78. |
| [15] | 回立川, 曹明远, 迟一璇. 融合粒子群的改进金豺算法及应用[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2024, 30(5): 1733-1744. |
| HUI Lichuan, CAo Mingyuan, CHI Yixuan. Improved golden jackal algorithm for fused particle swarm and its application[J]. Comput Integrat Manufact Sys, 2024, 30(5): 1733-1744. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | 邹红波, 李奇隆. 基于改进北方苍鹰优化算法的激光焊缝图像分类研究[J/OL]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), (2023-10-07) https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=rq9xis5c9i-VZxuo3d-zigKhB7y879Uah9wrfO_TTz9BjZ06eGG4GboxmDvrzkm7gIlz0RQypuibowhvY5Dihc7RSJRRUxsHG6MEbZ7Ip1zc9218wu7Ggv9wg85SU-mb124GUsgCSY1HDD2V1ri1B6fEk1LSTqHnRVfpNPgxurDW3ckglXUNqJSwtn_6HG6A&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS. |
| ZOU Hongbo, LI Qirong. Research on laser weld image classification based on Improved Northern Eagle Optimization Algorithm[J/OL]. J Jilin Univ (Engi Edit), (2023-10-07) https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=rq9xis5c9i-VZxuo3d-zigKhB7y879Uah9wrfO_TTz9BjZ06eGG4GboxmDvrzkm7gIlz0RQypuibowhvY5Dihc7RSJRRUxsHG6MEbZ7Ip1zc9218wu7Ggv9wg85SU-mb124GUsgCSY1HDD2V1ri1B6fEk1LSTqHnRVfpNPgxurDW3ckglXUNqJSwtn_6HG6A&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | XUE Jiankai, SHEN Bo. A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: Sparrow search algorithm[J]. Syst Sci Contr Eng, 2020, 8(1): 22-34. |
| [18] | Mirjalili S, Lewis A. The Whale Optimization Algorithm[J]. Advan Engi Softw. 2016, 95: 51-67. |
| [19] | ZHANG Haobin, SAN Hongjun, SUN Haijie, et al. A novel optimization method: Wave search algorithm[J]. J Supercompu, 2024, 80(12): 16824-16859. |
| [20] | 韩玲, 张晖, 方若愚, 等. 基于改进深度强化学习的全局路径规划策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(2): 202-211. |
| HAN Ling, ZHANG Hui, FANG Ruoyu, et al. Global path planning strategy based on improved deep reinforcement learning[J]. J Autom Safe Ener, 2023, 14(2): 202-211. (in Chinese) | |
| [21] | 采国顺, 刘昊吉, 冯吉伟, 等. 智能汽车的运动规划与控制研究综述[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(3): 279-297. |
| CAI Guoshun, LIU Haoji, FENG Jiwei, et al. Review of research on motion planning and control of intelligent vehicles[J]. J Autom Safe Ener, 2021, 12(3): 279-297. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | HUANG Zheng, WANG Hongxing, DU Biao, GAO Song, GAO Feng. Intelligent inspection method for power transmission towers, substations, and distribution poles using fixed UAV nests [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(5): 670-679. |
| [2] | HUANG Chen, JIA Dingpeng, SUN Xiaoqiang, XU Qing. Intelligent vehicle path planning method based on peripheral vehicle trajectory prediction [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(5): 753-762. |
| [3] | LI Yulong, XIE Hui, SONG Kang. An obstacle avoidance path planning algorithm for autonomous buses based on tracking error observation and target measurement error observation [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(4): 579-590. |
| [4] | JIN Lisheng, WEI Qingsong, XIE Xianyi, SHI Yewei, LUO Guofeng, LI Keqiang. Multi-vehicle cooperative path planning at untrusted intersections based on DMPC [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(2): 235-241. |
| [5] | MENG Qingjing, SI Junde, ZHANG Xinyu, SUN Honglin, WANG Xiaoyu, RONG Songsong. 3D path planning algorithm for ground and air amphibious platform based on graph search [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(2): 253-260. |
| [6] | HAN Ling, ZHANG Hui, FANG Ruoyu, LIU Guopeng, ZHU Changsheng, CHI Ruifeng. Global path planning strategy based on an improved deep reinforcement learning [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2023, 14(2): 202-211. |
| [7] | LI Wenli, XIAO Kaiwen, REN Yongpeng, LI Chao, Yi Fan. Path planning and control method for vehicle obstacle avoidance in pedestrian crossing scenes [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(3): 489-501. |
| [8] | LI Yaohua, FAN Jikang, LIU Yang, HE Jie, LI Zetian, PAN Shaofei. Path planning and path tracking control for autonomous vehicle based on MPC with adaptive dual-horizon-parameters [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(4): 528-539. |
| [9] | DU Mao, YANG Lin, JIN Yue, TU Jiayu. Vehicle global path planning algorithm based on spatio-temporal characteristics of traffic [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(1): 52-61. |
| [10] | LI Guofa,CHEN Yaoyu,Lü Chen,TAO Da,CAO Dongpu,CHENG Bo. Key techniques of semantic analysis of driving behavior in decision making of autonomous vehicles [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2019, 10(4): 391-412. |
| [11] | ZHU Xichan, LIU Zhichao, LI Lin. Evasive manoeuvre for emergency steering based on typical vehicle-pedestrian use case [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2015, 6(03): 217-223. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||