Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 577-586.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2025.04.008
• Automotive Energy Efficiency and Environment Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
YU Qian1(
), GUO Yuanyuan1, YANG Mingpeng2, ZHANG Yuting1
Received:2024-12-06
Revised:2025-03-29
Online:2025-08-30
Published:2025-08-27
CLC Number:
YU Qian, GUO Yuanyuan, YANG Mingpeng, ZHANG Yuting. Eco-car-following strategy based on the CO2 emission characteristics of car-following pairs[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(4): 577-586.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.journalase.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2025.04.008
| 标定参数 | 默认值 | 标定范围 | 标定结果 |
|---|---|---|---|
| v0(t) / (m·s-1) | 不设置上限 | [15, 40] | 17.61 |
| T0(t) / s | 0.25 | [0.1, 5] | 0.10 |
| Sjam / m | 2.5 | [0.1, 10] | 0.10 |
| amax / (m·s-2) | 2.6 | [0.1, 5] | 0.39 |
| acomf / (m·s-2) | 4.5 | [0.1, 5] | 2.84 |
| β | 4 | 20 | 20 |
| 标定参数 | 默认值 | 标定范围 | 标定结果 |
|---|---|---|---|
| v0(t) / (m·s-1) | 不设置上限 | [15, 40] | 17.61 |
| T0(t) / s | 0.25 | [0.1, 5] | 0.10 |
| Sjam / m | 2.5 | [0.1, 10] | 0.10 |
| amax / (m·s-2) | 2.6 | [0.1, 5] | 0.39 |
| acomf / (m·s-2) | 4.5 | [0.1, 5] | 2.84 |
| β | 4 | 20 | 20 |
| 参数 | 跟驰模型 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HV | CACC | ACC | |
| 颜色 | 红色 | 绿色 | 蓝色 |
| 车辆长度 / m | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 车辆加速能力 / (m·s-2) | 0.39 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| 车辆减速能力 / (m·s-2) | 2.84 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 车辆最大速度 / (m·s-1) | 17.61 | 34 | 34 |
| 车辆与前车距离 / m | 0.10 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 加速度指数 | 20 | - | - |
| 车头时距 / s | 0.10 | 1/2* | 1/2* |
| 车辆出发速度 / (m·s-1) | 随机 | 随机 | 随机 |
| 驾驶员完美程度 | 0.5 | 0.5/0* | 0.5/0* |
| 参数 | 跟驰模型 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HV | CACC | ACC | |
| 颜色 | 红色 | 绿色 | 蓝色 |
| 车辆长度 / m | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 车辆加速能力 / (m·s-2) | 0.39 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| 车辆减速能力 / (m·s-2) | 2.84 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 车辆最大速度 / (m·s-1) | 17.61 | 34 | 34 |
| 车辆与前车距离 / m | 0.10 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 加速度指数 | 20 | - | - |
| 车头时距 / s | 0.10 | 1/2* | 1/2* |
| 车辆出发速度 / (m·s-1) | 随机 | 随机 | 随机 |
| 驾驶员完美程度 | 0.5 | 0.5/0* | 0.5/0* |
| 场景 | CAV渗透率 / % | 交通量/ (辆·h-1) | 1 h 交通量 / 辆 | CACC/ACC 车辆比例 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HV车辆 | CACC车辆 | ACC车辆 | ||||
| 1* | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 400 | 400 | 1∶1 |
| 2 | 25 | 1 600 | 1 200 | 200 | 200 | 1∶1 |
| 3 | 75 | 1 600 | 400 | 600 | 600 | 1∶1 |
| 4 | 100 | 1 600 | 0 | 800 | 800 | 1∶1 |
| 5 | 50 | 800 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 1∶1 |
| 6 | 50 | 2 400 | 1 200 | 600 | 600 | 1∶1 |
| 7 | 50 | 3 200 | 1 600 | 800 | 800 | 1∶1 |
| 8 | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 0 | 800 | 0∶800 |
| 9 | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 200 | 600 | 1∶3 |
| 10 | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 600 | 200 | 3∶1 |
| 11 | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 800 | 0 | 800∶0 |
| 场景 | CAV渗透率 / % | 交通量/ (辆·h-1) | 1 h 交通量 / 辆 | CACC/ACC 车辆比例 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HV车辆 | CACC车辆 | ACC车辆 | ||||
| 1* | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 400 | 400 | 1∶1 |
| 2 | 25 | 1 600 | 1 200 | 200 | 200 | 1∶1 |
| 3 | 75 | 1 600 | 400 | 600 | 600 | 1∶1 |
| 4 | 100 | 1 600 | 0 | 800 | 800 | 1∶1 |
| 5 | 50 | 800 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 1∶1 |
| 6 | 50 | 2 400 | 1 200 | 600 | 600 | 1∶1 |
| 7 | 50 | 3 200 | 1 600 | 800 | 800 | 1∶1 |
| 8 | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 0 | 800 | 0∶800 |
| 9 | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 200 | 600 | 1∶3 |
| 10 | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 600 | 200 | 3∶1 |
| 11 | 50 | 1 600 | 800 | 800 | 0 | 800∶0 |
| CAV渗透率 % | CO2瞬时质量排放 / (g·s-1) | 减少比例 % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 不使用ECF策略 | 使用ECF策略 | ||
| 50 | 21.30 | 6.72 | 68.48 |
| 75 | 19.48 | 6.89 | 64.63 |
| 100 | 17.87 | 6.95 | 61.11 |
| 交通量 / (辆 · h-1) | |||
| 1 600 | 21.30 | 6.72 | 68.48 |
| 2 400 | 7.71 | 6.72 | 12.92 |
| 3 200 | 7.93 | 6.63 | 16.34 |
| CACC比例 / % | |||
| 50 | 21.30 | 6.72 | 68.48 |
| 75 | 19.00 | 6.94 | 63.50 |
| 100 | 17.51 | 6.94 | 60.40 |
| CAV渗透率 % | CO2瞬时质量排放 / (g·s-1) | 减少比例 % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 不使用ECF策略 | 使用ECF策略 | ||
| 50 | 21.30 | 6.72 | 68.48 |
| 75 | 19.48 | 6.89 | 64.63 |
| 100 | 17.87 | 6.95 | 61.11 |
| 交通量 / (辆 · h-1) | |||
| 1 600 | 21.30 | 6.72 | 68.48 |
| 2 400 | 7.71 | 6.72 | 12.92 |
| 3 200 | 7.93 | 6.63 | 16.34 |
| CACC比例 / % | |||
| 50 | 21.30 | 6.72 | 68.48 |
| 75 | 19.00 | 6.94 | 63.50 |
| 100 | 17.51 | 6.94 | 60.40 |
| [1] | 李国法, 陈耀昱, 吕辰, 等. 智能汽车决策中的驾驶行为语义解析关键技术[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2019, 10(4): 391-412. |
| LI Guofa, CHEN Yaoyu, LÜ Chen, et al. Key techniques of semantic analysis of driving behavior in decision making of autonomous vehicles[J]. J Autom Safe Energ, 2019, 10(4): 391-412. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 张铎, 饶红玉, 刘佳琦, 等. 基于自然驾驶数据的驾驶人跟驰行为内在异质性预测与建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(5): 33-44. |
| ZHANG Duo, RAO Hongyu, LIU Jiaqi, et al. Intra-driver heterogeneity prediction and modeling based on naturalistic driving experiment[J]. J Transp Syst Eng Info Techn, 2023, 23(5): 33-44. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | 冉斌, 谭华春, 张健, 等. 智能网联交通技术发展现状及趋势[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2018, 9(2): 119-130. |
| RAN Bin, TAN Huachun, ZHANG Jian, et al. Development status and trend of connected automated vehicle highway system[J]. J Autom Safe Energ, 2018, 9(2): 119-130. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | 杨秀建, 黄菁菁, 王曦. 考虑CACC汽车队列动态特性的混合交通流建模与仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 24(175): 1-13. |
| YANG Xiujian, HUANG Jingjing, WANG Xi. Modeling and simulation of hybrid traffic flow considering the inherent dynamics of CACC vehicular platoons[J]. J Syst Simul, 2024, 24(175): 1-13. (in Chinese) | |
| [5] | LI Renjie, QIN Yanyan. Car-following strategy involving stabilizing traffic flow with connected automated vehicles to reduce particulate matter (PM) emissions in rainy weather[J]. Sustain, 2024, 16(5): 2045. |
| [6] | HUANG Yan, YAN Xuedong, LI Xiaomeng, et al. Evaluating the safe and eco-driving performances of car-following behaviors in a vehicle platoon under foggy conditions[J]. J Transp Saf Secur, 2024, 16(2): 204-229. |
| [7] | QIN Yanyan, XIAO Tengfei, HE Zhengbing. Emissions-reduction strategy for connected autonomous vehicles on mixed traffic freeways[J]. Phys A, 2024, 653: No 130113. |
| [8] | HU Xiaosong, ZHANG Xiaoqian, TANG Xiaolin, et al. Model predictive control of hybrid electric vehicles for fuel economy, emission reductions, and inter-vehicle safety in car-following scenarios[J]. Energy, 2020, 196: Paper No 117101. |
| [9] | 李传耀, 张帆, 王涛, 等. 基于深度强化学习的道路交叉口生态驾驶策略研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(01): 81-92. |
| LI Chuanyao, ZHANG Fan, WANG Tao, et al. Signalized Intersection Eco-driving Strategy Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning[J]. J Transp Syst Eng Info Techn, 2024, 24(01): 81-92. (in Chinese) | |
| [10] | DONG Haoxuan, ZHUANG Weichao, CHEN Boli, et al. A comparative study of energy-efficient driving strategy for connected internal combustion engine and electric vehicles at signalized intersections[J]. Appl Energy, 2022, 310: No 118524. |
| [11] | 秦严严, 王昊, 冉斌. CACC车辆跟驰建模及混合交通流分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(2): 60-65. |
| QIN Yanyan, WANG Hao, RAN Bin. Car-following modeling for CACC vehicles and mixed traffic flow analysis[J]. J Transp Syst Eng Info Techn, 2018, 18(2): 60-65. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | Federal Highway Administration. US highway 101 dataset[Z/OL]. (2007-01-01). https://www.fhwa.dot.gov. |
| [13] | Chong L S, Abbas M M, Flintsch A M, et al. A rule-based neural network approach to model driver naturalistic behavior in traffic[J]. Transp Res Pt C-Emerg Technol, 2013, 32: 207-223. |
| [14] | XU Wei, LI Nan, LIANG Wenli, et al. Dissipation characteristics of vehicle queue in V2X environment based on improved car-following model[J]. Math Probl Eng, 2022, 2022: 1-17. |
| [15] | 王雪松, 朱美新. 基于自然驾驶数据的中国驾驶人城市快速路跟驰模型标定与验证[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(9): 129-137. |
| WANG Xuesong, ZHU Meixin. Calibrating and validating car-following models on urban expressways for chinese drivers using naturalistic driving data[J]. China J Highw Transp, 2018, 31(9): 129-137. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | Lundberg S, Lee S I. Welcome to the SHAP documentation[Z/OL]. (2025-03-05). https://shap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/. |
| [17] | Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations[J]. Phys Rev E, 2000, 62(2): 1805-1824. |
| [18] | 曹金亮, 史忠科, 房雅灵. 基于城市主干路交通流数据的跟驰模型标定[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2014, 32(6): 82-88. |
| CAO Jinliang, SHI Zhongke, FANG Yaling. Calibrating car-following models based on urban arterial video data[J]. J Transp Info Saf, 2014, 32(6): 82-88. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] | 秦严严, 杨晓庆, 王昊. 智能网联混合交通流CO2排放影响及改善方法[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2023, 53(1): 150-158. |
| QIN Yanyan, YANG Xiaoqing, WANG Hao. Impacts of CO2 emissions and improving method for connected and automated mixed traffic flow[J]. J Jilin Univ: Eng Techn Ed, 2023, 53(1): 150-158. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | WANG Meijun, MENG Yu, ZHENG Chao, PENG Xiaorui, XU Yan. Research on pedestrian collision injury assessment based on monocular pose estimation [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2026, 17(1): 33-39. |
| [2] | LIANG Yuchen, DUAN Weijian, ZHANG Shi, ZHU Xinglin, XU Jin. Mental workload variations of drivers navigating over the differential types of interchange ramps [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(6): 851-858. |
| [3] | CHENG Zeyang, DUAN Yiyang, YANG Mengmeng, FENG Zhongxiang, WANG He, ZHU Xiaojun, BAO Lixia. Recognition of the dangerous driving behaviors and the driving styles in weaving areas based on a hybrid neural network [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(5): 688-697. |
| [4] | HAN Yu, CHEN Zhixuan, WANG Yixuan, LI Chunjie, LEI Wei, JIAO Yanli, LIU Pan. Deep reinforcement learning-based strategy for freeway ramp metering [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(4): 587-597. |
| [5] | YANG Yang, WANG Yichun, ZHANG Yi, YU Qian, ZHANG Tao. Characterization of ammonia emissions from urban motor vehicles in Taiyuan based on MOVES model [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(3): 425-433. |
| [6] | YU Anjun, LI Yingdi, YANG Zheyi, FU Chongyu, TONG Weiping, YU Jia, LIU Yunhai, LIU Zhiyuan. Highway traffic flow prediction approach based on multi-dimensional attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(3): 463-469. |
| [7] | XU Junli. Driver fatigue detection based on functional brain networks and graph convolutional networks [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(2): 226-233. |
| [8] | YANG Lan, ZHAO Xiangmo, WANG Runmin, WANG Zhen, FANG Shan, QU Guangyue. Review on testing and evaluation of cognitive abilities for autonomous vehicles [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(1): 1-15. |
| [9] | WU Qingfu, YUAN Manrong, HAO Shuaijie, LIU Jiawei, NIU Shifeng, LIU Jinfeng. Characteristic indicators of driver stress response in emergency situations [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(1): 43-49. |
| [10] | LIU Qingchao, WANG Ruihai, CAI Yingfeng, WANG Hai, CHEN Long. Unintended stopping conflict risk prediction for high-level autonomous vehicles based on CatBoost and SHAP [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(1): 170-180. |
| [11] | LI Xinguang, SUN Chongxiao, QU Dayi, YU Wenchang, HU Han. Eco-driving strategy for mixed traffic flow of connected automated vehicles considering intersection start-stop wave [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(6): 895-904. |
| [12] | CAI Tianmao, KONG Weiwei, LUO Yugong, SHI Jia, JI Pengxiao, LI Congmin. Multi-vehicle cooperative control in ramp merging area based on MADDPG algorithm [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(6): 923-933. |
| [13] | LIU Yang, ZHAN Jiahao, LI Shen, LI Xiaopeng, CHEN Jun. Future of autonomous driving: Single autonomous driving and intelligent vehicle-infrastructure collaboration systems [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(5): 611-633. |
| [14] | WU Tong, HUANG Kai, LIU Zhiyuan, JIANG Wei. Review on the integrated capacity of transportation and power networks [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(5): 634-649. |
| [15] | YAO Ronghan, XU Wentao, LIN Zijing, WANG Libing. Multi-objective bi-level programming model for optimization design of bus-HOV lanes [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(5): 711-722. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||