Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 386-395.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2025.03.004
• Automotive Safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHENG Rui1(
), LU Chuncheng1(
), YUAN Quan2,*(
), CUI Tao3, To. Jeremy3, WANG Tao1
Received:2024-09-22
Revised:2025-01-04
Online:2025-06-30
Published:2025-07-01
CLC Number:
CHENG Rui, LU Chuncheng, YUAN Quan, CUI Tao, To. Jeremy, WANG Tao. Evaluation on the complexity of scenarios for VRU on urban roads based on self-organizing K-means[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(3): 386-395.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.journalase.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2025.03.004
| 变量 | 状态 | OR | ω | c | 状态 | OR | ω | c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRU交通方式 | 步行 | 1.141 | 0.281 | 0.357 | 自行车 | 1.101 | 0.271 | 0.346 |
| 电动车 | 0.815 | 0.201 | 0.264 | 摩托车 | 1.000 | 0.247 | 0.318 | |
| 汽车行驶状态 | 直行 | 0.596 | 0.295 | 0.373 | 左转弯 | 0.427 | 0.211 | 0.276 |
| 右转弯 | 1.000 | 0.494 | 0.579 | |||||
| 道路横断面位置 | 机动车道 | 0.570 | 0.191 | 0.252 | 非机动车道 | 0.237 | 0.079 | 0.110 |
| 机非混合道 | 0.465 | 0.156 | 0.209 | 人行道 | 0.709 | 0.238 | 0.308 | |
| 人行横道 | 1.000 | 0.336 | 0.418 | |||||
| 交通信号方式 | 无控制 | 0.876 | 0.263 | 0.337 | 标志标线 | 1.452 | 0.436 | 0.522 |
| 信号控制 | 1.000 | 0.301 | 0.379 | |||||
| 路口路段类型 | 普通路段 | 1.193 | 0.349 | 0.432 | T型路口 | 1.224 | 0.358 | 0.442 |
| X型路口 | 1.000 | 0.293 | 0.370 | |||||
| 天气 | 晴天 | 1.036 | 0.348 | 0.431 | 阴天 | 0.941 | 0.316 | 0.396 |
| 雨天 | 1.000 | 0.336 | 0.418 | |||||
| 能见度 | <50 m | 2.065 | 0.371 | 0.456 | 50~100 m | 1.463 | 0.263 | 0.337 |
| 100~200 m | 1.032 | 0.186 | 0.246 | >200 m | 1.000 | 0.180 | 0.239 | |
| 事故碰撞形态 | 追尾碰撞 | 2.524 | 0.260 | 0.334 | 正面碰撞 | 1.404 | 0.145 | 0.195 |
| 侧面碰撞(同向) | 1.838 | 0.190 | 0.250 | 侧面碰撞(对向) | 1.695 | 0.175 | 0.232 | |
| 侧面碰撞(直角) | 1.235 | 0.127 | 0.173 | 侧面碰撞(不确定) | 1.000 | 0.103 | 0.142 | |
| 照明条件 | 白天 | 0.808 | 0.332 | 0.413 | 夜间有照明 | 0.629 | 0.258 | 0.331 |
| 夜间无照明 | 1.000 | 0.410 | 0.496 | |||||
| VRU行驶状态 | 直行 | 0.625 | 0.186 | 0.246 | 左转弯 | 0.334 | 0.099 | 0.136 |
| 右转弯 | 0.556 | 0.165 | 0.221 | 过人行横道 | 0.850 | 0.253 | 0.325 | |
| 横穿马路 | 1.000 | 0.297 | 0.375 | |||||
| 限速(km/h) | 20 | 1.412 | 0.287 | 0.365 | 30 | 1.135 | 0.231 | 0.300 |
| 40 | 0.639 | 0.130 | 0.177 | 50 | 0.726 | 0.148 | 0.199 | |
| 60 | 1.000 | 0.204 | 0.267 | |||||
| 人行横道 | 无 | 0.896 | 0.473 | 0.558 | 有 | 1.000 | 0.527 | 0.611 |
| 路内停车位 | 无 | 1.679 | 0.627 | 0.702 | 有 | 1.000 | 0.373 | 0.458 |
| 变量 | 状态 | OR | ω | c | 状态 | OR | ω | c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRU交通方式 | 步行 | 1.141 | 0.281 | 0.357 | 自行车 | 1.101 | 0.271 | 0.346 |
| 电动车 | 0.815 | 0.201 | 0.264 | 摩托车 | 1.000 | 0.247 | 0.318 | |
| 汽车行驶状态 | 直行 | 0.596 | 0.295 | 0.373 | 左转弯 | 0.427 | 0.211 | 0.276 |
| 右转弯 | 1.000 | 0.494 | 0.579 | |||||
| 道路横断面位置 | 机动车道 | 0.570 | 0.191 | 0.252 | 非机动车道 | 0.237 | 0.079 | 0.110 |
| 机非混合道 | 0.465 | 0.156 | 0.209 | 人行道 | 0.709 | 0.238 | 0.308 | |
| 人行横道 | 1.000 | 0.336 | 0.418 | |||||
| 交通信号方式 | 无控制 | 0.876 | 0.263 | 0.337 | 标志标线 | 1.452 | 0.436 | 0.522 |
| 信号控制 | 1.000 | 0.301 | 0.379 | |||||
| 路口路段类型 | 普通路段 | 1.193 | 0.349 | 0.432 | T型路口 | 1.224 | 0.358 | 0.442 |
| X型路口 | 1.000 | 0.293 | 0.370 | |||||
| 天气 | 晴天 | 1.036 | 0.348 | 0.431 | 阴天 | 0.941 | 0.316 | 0.396 |
| 雨天 | 1.000 | 0.336 | 0.418 | |||||
| 能见度 | <50 m | 2.065 | 0.371 | 0.456 | 50~100 m | 1.463 | 0.263 | 0.337 |
| 100~200 m | 1.032 | 0.186 | 0.246 | >200 m | 1.000 | 0.180 | 0.239 | |
| 事故碰撞形态 | 追尾碰撞 | 2.524 | 0.260 | 0.334 | 正面碰撞 | 1.404 | 0.145 | 0.195 |
| 侧面碰撞(同向) | 1.838 | 0.190 | 0.250 | 侧面碰撞(对向) | 1.695 | 0.175 | 0.232 | |
| 侧面碰撞(直角) | 1.235 | 0.127 | 0.173 | 侧面碰撞(不确定) | 1.000 | 0.103 | 0.142 | |
| 照明条件 | 白天 | 0.808 | 0.332 | 0.413 | 夜间有照明 | 0.629 | 0.258 | 0.331 |
| 夜间无照明 | 1.000 | 0.410 | 0.496 | |||||
| VRU行驶状态 | 直行 | 0.625 | 0.186 | 0.246 | 左转弯 | 0.334 | 0.099 | 0.136 |
| 右转弯 | 0.556 | 0.165 | 0.221 | 过人行横道 | 0.850 | 0.253 | 0.325 | |
| 横穿马路 | 1.000 | 0.297 | 0.375 | |||||
| 限速(km/h) | 20 | 1.412 | 0.287 | 0.365 | 30 | 1.135 | 0.231 | 0.300 |
| 40 | 0.639 | 0.130 | 0.177 | 50 | 0.726 | 0.148 | 0.199 | |
| 60 | 1.000 | 0.204 | 0.267 | |||||
| 人行横道 | 无 | 0.896 | 0.473 | 0.558 | 有 | 1.000 | 0.527 | 0.611 |
| 路内停车位 | 无 | 1.679 | 0.627 | 0.702 | 有 | 1.000 | 0.373 | 0.458 |
| 维度信息 | 权重,σ | 变量信息权重,μ |
|---|---|---|
| 自车因素,C1 | 0.156 | 汽车行驶状态,0.491; 事故碰撞形态,0.510 |
| VRU因素,C2 | 0.168 | VRU交通方式,0.491; VRU行驶状态,0.509 |
| 道路因素,C3 | 0.454 | 交通信号控制,0.193; 路口路段类型,0.167;人行横道,0.123; |
| 路内停车位,0.186; 限速,0.158; 道路横断面位置,0.173 | ||
| 环境因素,C4 | 0.223 | 天气,0.302; 照明条件,0.308; 能见度,0.390 |
| 维度信息 | 权重,σ | 变量信息权重,μ |
|---|---|---|
| 自车因素,C1 | 0.156 | 汽车行驶状态,0.491; 事故碰撞形态,0.510 |
| VRU因素,C2 | 0.168 | VRU交通方式,0.491; VRU行驶状态,0.509 |
| 道路因素,C3 | 0.454 | 交通信号控制,0.193; 路口路段类型,0.167;人行横道,0.123; |
| 路内停车位,0.186; 限速,0.158; 道路横断面位置,0.173 | ||
| 环境因素,C4 | 0.223 | 天气,0.302; 照明条件,0.308; 能见度,0.390 |
| [1] | 胡伟超, 陈艳艳, 于鹏程, 等. 数据驱动的公路典型风险场景聚类与特征分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(8): 3426-3433. |
| HU Weichao, CHEN Yanyan, YU Pengcheng, et al. Data-driven clustering and characteristic analysis of typical highway risk scenarios[J]. Sci Tech Engi, 2024, 24(8): 3426-3433. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 徐向阳, 胡文浩, 董红磊, 等. 自动驾驶汽车测试场景构建关键技术综述[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(4): 610-619. |
| XU Xiangyang, HU Wenhao, DONG Honglei, et al. Review of key technologies for constructing test scenarios of autonomous vehicles[J]. Autom Engineering, 2021, 43(4): 610-619. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] |
朱冰, 张培兴, 赵健, 等. 基于场景的自动驾驶汽车虚拟测试研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(6): 1-19.
doi: 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2019.06.001 |
| ZHU Bing, ZHANG Peixing, ZHAO Jian, et al. Research progress on scenario-based virtual testing of autonomous vehicles[J]. China J Highw Transport, 2019, 32(6): 1-19. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | 徐向阳, 周兆辉, 胡文浩, 等. 基于事故数据挖掘的AEB路口测试场景[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(10): 1817-1825. |
| XU Xiangyang, ZHOU Zhaohui, HU Wenhao, et al. AEB intersection test scenarios based on accident data mining[J]. J Beijing Univ Aeron Astron, 2020, 46(10): 1817-1825. (in Chinese) | |
| [5] | 廖静倩, 张道文, 高立, 等. 基于NAIS事故数据聚类的丁字路口危险场景研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(3): 336-345. |
| LIAO Jingqian, ZHANG Daowen, GAO Li, et al. Research on dangerous scenarios of T-intersections based on NAIS accident data clustering[J]. J Autom Safe Energ, 2021, 12(3): 336-345. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] | 蒙昊蓝, 陈君毅, 陈磊, 等. 基于自然驾驶数据的匝道行驶典型场景聚类分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(S1): 123-131. |
| MENG Haolan, CHEN Junyi, CHEN Lei, et al. Clustering analysis of typical ramp driving scenarios based on natural driving data[J]. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci), 2021, 49(S1): 123-131. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] |
Nitsche P, Thomas P, Stuetz R, et al. Pre-crash scenarios at road junctions: A clustering method for car crash data[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2017, 107: 137-151.
doi: S0001-4575(17)30246-4 pmid: 28841448 |
| [8] |
Sander U, Lubbe N. The potential of clustering methods to define intersection test scenarios: Assessing real-life performance of AEB[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2018, 113: 1-11.
doi: S0001-4575(18)30010-1 pmid: 29355748 |
| [9] | Sui B, Lubbe N, Bärgman J. A clustering approach to developing car-to-two-wheeler test scenarios for the assessment of automated emergency braking in China using in-depth Chinese crash data[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2019, 132: No 105242. |
| [10] | ZHOU Rui, HUANG Helai, Jaeyoung L, et al. Identifying typical pre-crash scenarios based on in-depth crash data with deep embedded clustering for autonomous vehicle safety testing[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2023, 191: No 107218. |
| [11] | 任立海, 夏环, 蒋成约, 等. 基于交通事故数据的自动紧急制动系统测试场景构建[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(24): 10737-10747. |
| REN Lihai, XIA Huan, JIANG Chengyue, et al. Construction of test scenarios for automatic emergency braking systems based on traffic accident data[J]. Sci Tech Engi, 2022, 22(24): 10737-10747. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | 张海潮. 基于引力模型的道路交通环境复杂度研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2016. |
| ZHANG Haichao. Research on road traffic environment complexity based on gravity model[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] | 李平飞, 金思雨, 胡文浩, 等. 用于自动驾驶仿真测试的车-车事故场景复杂度评价[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(4): 697-704. |
| LI Pingfei, JIN Siyu, HU Wenhao, et al. Complexity evaluation of vehicle-to-vehicle accident scenarios for autonomous driving simulation testing[J]. J Autom Safe Energ, 2022, 13(4): 697-704. (in Chinese) | |
| [14] | 李江坤, 邓伟文, 任秉韬, 等. 一种智能汽车测试场景复杂度的评估方法[C]// 2020中国汽车工程学会年会论文集(1). 中国: 中国汽车工程学会, 2020. |
| LI Jiangkun, DENG Weiwen, REN Bingtao, et al. An evaluation method for the complexity of intelligent vehicle test scenarios[C]// 2020 China Soc Autom Engi Annu Conf (1), China Society of Automotive Engineers, 2020. (in Chinese) | |
| [15] | 董汉, 舒伟, 陈超, 等. 危险驾驶工况场景的复杂度评估方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(6): 808-814. |
| DONG Han, SHU Wei, CHEN Chao, et al. Research on the complexity evaluation method of dangerous driving condition scenarios[J]. Autom Engineering, 2020, 42(6): 808-814. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | 刘颖, 贺锦鹏, 刘卫国, 等. 自动紧急制动系统行人测试场景的研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2014(3): 35-39. |
| LIU Ying, HE Jinping, LIU Weiguo, et al. Research on pedestrian test scenarios for automatic emergency braking systems[J]. Autom Tech, 2014, 3: 35-39. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | 林国庆, 逯超, 韩龙飞, 等. 汽车自动紧急制动系统行人测试与评价方法[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3): 296-304. |
| LIN Guoqing, LU Chao, HAN Longfei, et al. Test and evaluation method of pedestrian automatic emergency braking system[J]. J Autom Safe Energ, 2020, 11(3): 296-304. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] | 张诗波, 何治剑, 廖静倩, 等. 基于NAIS的AEB系统路口测试场景研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2021, 39(1): 87-96. |
| ZHANG Shibo, HE Zhijian, LIAO Jingqian, et al. Research on AEB system intersection test scenarios based on NAIS[J]. J Transport Info Safe, 2021, 39(1): 87-96. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] | 胡林, 易平, 黄晶, 等. 基于真实事故案例的自动紧急制动系统两轮车测试场景研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2018, 40(12): 1435-1446,1453. |
| HU Lin, YI Ping, HUANG Jing, et al. Research on two-wheeler test scenarios for automatic emergency braking systems based on real accident cases[J]. Autom Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 1435-1446,1453. (in Chinese) | |
| [20] | 董镇林, 伍世虔, 叶健, 等. 基于自组织聚类和JS散度的RBF神经网络[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2024, 45(4): 1062-1068. |
| DONG Zhenlin, WU Shiqian, YE Jian, et al. RBF neural network based on self-organizing clustering and JS divergence[J]. Comput Engi Desig, 2024, 45(4): 1062-1068. (in Chinese) | |
| [21] |
陈吉清, 舒孝雄, 兰凤崇, 等. 典型危险事故特征的自动驾驶测试场景构建[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(5): 1-8.
doi: 10.12141/j.issn.1000-565X.200371 |
| CHEN Jiqing, SHU Xiaoxiong, LAN Fengchong, et al. Construction of autonomous driving test scenarios based on typical hazardous accident characteristics[J]. J South China Univ Tech (Nat Sci Edit), 2021, 49(5): 1-8. (in Chinese) | |
| [22] | PAN Di, HAN Yong, JIN Qianqian, et al. Study of typical electric two-wheelers pre-crash scenarios using K-medoids clustering methodology based on video recordings in China[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2021, 160: No 106320. |
| [23] | CAO Yi, XIAO Lingyun, DONG Honglei, et al. Typical pre-crash scenarios reconstruction for two-wheelers and passenger vehicles and its application in parameter optimization of AEB system based on NAIS database[C]// Proc 26th Int’l Tech Conf Enhan Safe Vehi (ESV). Netherland, 2019: 1-15. NO 19-0272. |
| [24] | 吕超, 孟相浩, 崔格格, 等. 基于图分类的智能车辆复杂场景风险等级评估与建模[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2023, 43(7): 726-733. |
| LÜ Chao, MENG Xianghao, CUI Gege, et al. Risk level assessment and modeling of complex scenarios for intelligent vehicles based on graph classification[J]. J Beijing Instit Tech, 2023, 43(7): 726-733. (in Chinese) | |
| [25] | YUAN Quan, SHI Haixu, ZHAO Junwei, et al. Influencing factors analysis of helmet wearing for electric bicycle riders based on ordinal multinomial logistic model[J]. Transport Safe Environ, 2022, 4(1): 63-75. |
| [26] | ZHOU Wei, LIU Yuqing, ZHAO Lei, et al. Pedestrian crossing intention prediction from surveillance videos for Over-the-Horizon safety warning[J]. IEEE Trans Intel Transport Syst, 2024, 25(2): 1394-1407. |
| [27] | 黎兰平. 基于行人-自动驾驶汽车车外人机交互界面参与式设计研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2022. |
| LI Lanping. Participatory design research on pedestrian-autonomous vehicle external human-machine interfaces[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2022. (in Chinese) | |
| [28] | HUANZG Yanjun, DU Jiatong, YANG Ziru, et al. A survey on trajectory-prediction methods for autonomous driving[J]. IEEE Trans Intel Vehi, 2022, 7(3): 652-674. |
| [1] | ZHAO Jian, GONG Jue, FAN Kefeng, LIU Pengbo, LI Linhui, WANG Xiang, XU Zheng, DONG Zeyuan, YAO Nianmin. Safety and protection technologies for intelligent vehicles with strongly coupled structural, functional and information domains [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(6): 813-831. |
| [2] | SHI Tianjing, LI Xu. Traffic flow parameter prediction method based on dynamic graphs self-attention [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(5): 680-688. |
| [3] | HUANG Chen, JIA Dingpeng, SUN Xiaoqiang, XU Qing. Intelligent vehicle path planning method based on peripheral vehicle trajectory prediction [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(5): 753-762. |
| [4] | ZHOU Xing, LIU Fuyun, TANG Zhentian, DENG Jucai. Optimal lateral acceleration driver model based on trajectory prediction [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2023, 14(3): 338-345. |
| [5] | CHENG Jie, ZHENG Kai, QIN Jia, WU Xiaodong. Functional safety analysis and application design of EMB system for intelligent vehicles [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2023, 14(1): 69-79. |
| [6] | LI Wenli, XIAO Kaiwen, REN Yongpeng, LI Chao, Yi Fan. Path planning and control method for vehicle obstacle avoidance in pedestrian crossing scenes [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(3): 489-501. |
| [7] | FANG Liang, GUAN Zhiwei, WANG Tao, GONG Jinfeng, DU Feng. Collision avoidance model and its validation for intelligent vehicles based on deep learning LSTM [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(1): 104-111. |
| [8] | ZHAO Shuen, CHEN Wenbin, DENG Zhaoxue, LIU Wei. Trajectory tracking control for intelligent vehicles driving in curved road based on expanded state observers [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(1): 112-121. |
| [9] | WANG Hai, XU Yansong, CAI Yingfeng, CHEN Long. Overview of intelligent vehicle multi-target detection technology based on multi-sensor fusion [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(4): 440-455. |
| [10] | CAI Guoshun, LIU Haoji, FENG Jiwei, XU Liwei, YIN Guodong. Review on the research of motion planning and control for intelligent vehicles [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(3): 279-297. |
| [11] | HU Yuanzhi,LIU Junsheng,HE Jia,XIAO Hang,SONG Jia . Vehicle object detection method based on data fusion of LADAR points and image [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2019, 10(4): 451-458. |
| [12] | JIN Zhilin, HE Linxuan, ZHAO Wanzhong . Detection and tracking method of lane line for intelligent vehicles under complex illumination condition [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2019, 10(4): 459-466. |
| [13] | WEI Minxiang, TENG Decheng . Algorithm for lane region segmentation based on fullyconvolutional-network [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2019, 10(3): 334-341. |
| [14] | LI Shengbo, GUAN Yang, HOU Lian, GAO Hongbo, DUAN Jingliang, LIANG Shuang,WANG Yu, CHENG Bo, LI Keqiang, REN Wei, LI Jun. Key technique of deep neural network and its applications in autonomous driving [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2019, 10(2): 119-145. |
| [15] | RONG Qin, WU Xiaodong, XU Min. Functional safety concept design for steer-by-wire system of road vehicle based on the ISO [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2018, 9(3): 250-257. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||