Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 659-666.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2022.04.007
• Automotive Safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Zhen1(
), WANG Xingchang2(
), GUANG Lijun3,4, SUN Haiyun3,4, FAN Yukun2, ZHU He3,4, ZHOU Dayong3,4, GU Xianguang5
Received:2021-11-26
Revised:2022-07-25
Online:2022-12-31
Published:2023-01-01
CLC Number:
YANG Zhen, WANG Xingchang, GUANG Lijun, SUN Haiyun, FAN Yukun, ZHU He, ZHOU Dayong, GU Xianguang. Research on occupant high-risk accident scenarios of passenger cars in China[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(4): 659-666.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.journalase.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2022.04.007
| 变量 | 分类 |
|---|---|
| 受伤情况 | 无伤、轻伤、重伤、死亡 |
| 事故前 场景 | C1—穿行遇从右侧来的目标物、C2—穿行遇从左侧来的目标物; D1—右弯行车、D2—左弯行车、D3—直行行车; L1—碰撞前方正常直行的目标物、L2—碰撞前方的目标物(目标物从右侧强行变道而来)、L4—被后方直行的目标物追尾; O1—身体原因、O2—障碍物、O3-车辆故障; On1—遇同一车道的对向目标物、On2—向左换道与对向目标物; P2—驻车时遇目标物; T3—车辆左转遇从对向来的目标物等。 |
| 事故形态 | 正面碰撞、侧面碰撞、尾随相撞; 相对刮擦、同向刮擦; 碰撞固定物、碰撞静止车辆; 多车事故; 刮撞机动二/三轮车事故、刮撞自行车事故; 刮撞行人、翻滚等。 |
| 车辆部位 | 前部、后部、左侧、右侧、车顶、底部。 |
| 是否翻滚 | 翻滚、未翻滚。 |
| 参与方 类型 | 乘用车、客车、货车; 二/三轮摩托车、二/三轮自行车、二/三轮电动车; 行人,其他。 |
| 碰撞对象 | 猪、鹿、羊; 道路表面; 防撞护栏、立柱、红绿灯、电线杆; 灌木、树木(稳固的)等。 |
| 变量 | 分类 |
|---|---|
| 受伤情况 | 无伤、轻伤、重伤、死亡 |
| 事故前 场景 | C1—穿行遇从右侧来的目标物、C2—穿行遇从左侧来的目标物; D1—右弯行车、D2—左弯行车、D3—直行行车; L1—碰撞前方正常直行的目标物、L2—碰撞前方的目标物(目标物从右侧强行变道而来)、L4—被后方直行的目标物追尾; O1—身体原因、O2—障碍物、O3-车辆故障; On1—遇同一车道的对向目标物、On2—向左换道与对向目标物; P2—驻车时遇目标物; T3—车辆左转遇从对向来的目标物等。 |
| 事故形态 | 正面碰撞、侧面碰撞、尾随相撞; 相对刮擦、同向刮擦; 碰撞固定物、碰撞静止车辆; 多车事故; 刮撞机动二/三轮车事故、刮撞自行车事故; 刮撞行人、翻滚等。 |
| 车辆部位 | 前部、后部、左侧、右侧、车顶、底部。 |
| 是否翻滚 | 翻滚、未翻滚。 |
| 参与方 类型 | 乘用车、客车、货车; 二/三轮摩托车、二/三轮自行车、二/三轮电动车; 行人,其他。 |
| 碰撞对象 | 猪、鹿、羊; 道路表面; 防撞护栏、立柱、红绿灯、电线杆; 灌木、树木(稳固的)等。 |
| 事故前 | 事故数 / % | 死亡数 / % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 碰撞 乘用车 | 碰撞 货车 | 单车 事故 | 碰撞 乘用车 | 碰撞 货车 | 单车 事故 | |
| L1 | 5.1 | 7.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 16.2 | 0.7 |
| D3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.7 |
| C1 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 0.0 |
| On1 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 0.0 |
| O1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 6.6 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 11.0 |
| C2 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 |
| L4 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| On2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 5.2 | 0.0 |
| T3 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| O3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| D2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.9 |
| L2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 |
| O2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
| D1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 5.5 |
| 事故前 | 事故数 / % | 死亡数 / % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 碰撞 乘用车 | 碰撞 货车 | 单车 事故 | 碰撞 乘用车 | 碰撞 货车 | 单车 事故 | |
| L1 | 5.1 | 7.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 16.2 | 0.7 |
| D3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.7 |
| C1 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 0.0 |
| On1 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 0.0 |
| O1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 6.6 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 11.0 |
| C2 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 |
| L4 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| On2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 5.2 | 0.0 |
| T3 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| O3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| D2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.9 |
| L2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 |
| O2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.4 |
| D1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 5.5 |
| 测试场景类型图示 | 评价目的描述 | 对应功能 | Euro NCAP | C-NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 直行时避免碰撞同向的汽车 | 同向汽车的AEB CCR功能,含FCW功能 | 有 | 有 |
![]() | 左转时避免碰撞对向汽车 | 对向汽车的AEB CCF功能,含FCW功能 | 有 | 规划中 |
![]() | 避免汽车在直道中偏出道路的测试 | LSS,含LDW、LKA、ELK | 有 | 有 |
| 测试场景类型图示 | 评价目的描述 | 对应功能 | Euro NCAP | C-NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 直行时避免碰撞同向的汽车 | 同向汽车的AEB CCR功能,含FCW功能 | 有 | 有 |
![]() | 左转时避免碰撞对向汽车 | 对向汽车的AEB CCF功能,含FCW功能 | 有 | 规划中 |
![]() | 避免汽车在直道中偏出道路的测试 | LSS,含LDW、LKA、ELK | 有 | 有 |
| 车辆部位 | 事故数 / % | 死亡数 / % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 碰乘用车 | 碰撞货车 | 碰撞护栏 | 碰撞立柱 | 碰乘用车 | 碰撞货车 | 碰撞护栏 | 碰撞立柱 | |
| 前部 | 20.0 | 14.3 | 8.8 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 25.1 | 9.3 | 8.2 |
| 副驾驶侧 | 9.7 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 3.8 |
| 驾驶侧 | 5.6 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 2.7 |
| 后部 | 5.1 | 4.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 车辆部位 | 事故数 / % | 死亡数 / % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 碰乘用车 | 碰撞货车 | 碰撞护栏 | 碰撞立柱 | 碰乘用车 | 碰撞货车 | 碰撞护栏 | 碰撞立柱 | |
| 前部 | 20.0 | 14.3 | 8.8 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 25.1 | 9.3 | 8.2 |
| 副驾驶侧 | 9.7 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 3.8 |
| 驾驶侧 | 5.6 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 2.7 |
| 后部 | 5.1 | 4.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 场景类型 | 工况描述 | 变形吸能特征 | Euro NCAP | C-NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 100%重叠率正面碰撞刚性墙壁 | 双侧前纵梁都变形吸能 | 有 | 有 |
![]() | 与乘用车正面50%重叠率的碰撞 | 驾驶员侧前纵梁变形吸能 | 有 | 有 |
![]() | 侧面被乘用车碰撞 | 驾驶员侧的门槛梁、 B柱和前后车门变形吸能 | 有 | 有 |
![]() | 乘员舱侧面撞刚性柱 | 驾驶员侧的门槛梁、车顶梁和前车门变形吸能 | 有 | 有 |
| 场景类型 | 工况描述 | 变形吸能特征 | Euro NCAP | C-NCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 100%重叠率正面碰撞刚性墙壁 | 双侧前纵梁都变形吸能 | 有 | 有 |
![]() | 与乘用车正面50%重叠率的碰撞 | 驾驶员侧前纵梁变形吸能 | 有 | 有 |
![]() | 侧面被乘用车碰撞 | 驾驶员侧的门槛梁、 B柱和前后车门变形吸能 | 有 | 有 |
![]() | 乘员舱侧面撞刚性柱 | 驾驶员侧的门槛梁、车顶梁和前车门变形吸能 | 有 | 有 |
| [1] | 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 国家数据[EB/OL]. [2022-11-04], https://data.stats.gov.cn/. |
| National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China. National data[EB/OL]. [2022-11-04], https://data.stats.gov.cn/. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | 张金换, 杜汇良, 马春生. 汽车碰撞安全性设计[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2010: 10-15. |
| ZHANG Jinhuan, DU Huiliang, MA Chunsheng. Automobile Collision Safety Design[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2010: 10-15. | |
| [3] | 中华人民共和国公安部. 中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报(2019年度)[R]. 无锡: 公安部交通管理科学研究所, 2020. |
| The Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China. Annual report on road traffic accident statistics (2019) of The Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China[R]. Traffic Management Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security, Wuxi, 2020. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | CHEN Qiang, CHEN Yong, Ola Bostrom, et al. A Comparison study of car-to-pedestrian and car-to-E-bike accidents: Data source: The China in-depth accident study (CIDAS)[R]. SAE Tech Papers, 2014-1-0519. |
| [5] | 苏江平, 陈君毅, 王宏雁, 等. 基于中国危险工况的行人交通冲突典型场景提取与分析[J]. 交通与运输(学术版), 2017(1): 216-221. |
| SU Jiangping, CHEN Junyi, WANG Hongyan, et al. Extraction and analysis of typical scenarios of pedestrain traffic conflicts based on hazardous working conditions in China[J]. Traf Transport, 2017(1): 216-221. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] | LI Xvdong, LIN Miao, LIAN Xiaowei, et al. Passenger car 25% overlapping collision accident study base on CIDAS[C]// SAE 2018 Intel Connect Vehi Symp. Kunshan, China, 2018. |
| [7] |
袁泉, 高岩, 裘晨璐. 基于人-机-环境因素的未来交通事故风险研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019 (3): 566-574.
doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.17WJP-012 |
|
YUAN Quan, GAO Yan, QIU Chenlu. Future traffic accident risk investigation based on human-machine-environment factors[J]. J Syst Simul, 2019 (3): 566-574. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.17WJP-012 |
|
| [8] | 周青, 姬佩君, 黄毅, 等. 未来交通事故场景中乘员智能保护的挑战与机遇[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2017, 8(4): 333-350. |
| ZHOU Qing, JI Peijun, HUANG Yi, et al. Challenges and opportunities of smart occupant protection against motor vehicle collision accidents in future traffic environment[J]. Autom Safe Energ, 2017, 8(4): 333-350. (in Chinese) | |
| [9] | 张康康, 穆文浩, 罗慧冉. 在用电动汽车安全事故分析与安全保障研究[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2020(15): 250-252. |
| ZHANG Kangkang, MU Wenhao, LUO Huiran. Safety analysis and operating safeguard for in-use electric vehicles[J]. Autom Appl Tech, 2020(15): 250-252. (in Chinese) | |
| [10] | 张晓辉. 汽车驾驶员主动安全性因素的辨识与分析[J]. 质量与安全, 2019, 4(11): 341-342. |
| ZHANG Xiaohui. Identification and analysis of active safety factors for car drivers[J]. Quality and Safety, 2019, 4(11): 341-342. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | 何石坚. 基于驾驶人-车辆-道路-环境全因素的高速公路事故分析与预测方法[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2019. |
| HE Shijian. Accident analysis and prediction method of expressway based on whole factors of driver, vehicle, road and environment[D]. South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 2019. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | Najm W G, Smith J D, Yanagisawa M. Pre-crash scenario typology for crash avoidance research[R]. Dot Hs 810 767, 2007. |
| [13] | Feifel H, Wagner M. Harmonized scenarios for the evaluation of active safety systems based on in-depth-accident data[C]// 8th Int’l Expert Symp Accid Res (ESAR), Hanover, America, 2018. |
| [14] | 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司. C-NCAP管理规则(2021年版):主动安全ADAS系统试验方法[S]. 天津: 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司, 2021. |
| China Automotive Technology Research Center co., LTD. C - NCAP management protocols (2021): Active safety ADAS test protocol[S]. Tianjin: China Automotive Technology Research Center co., LTD, 2021. | |
| [15] | Euro NCAP. Assessment protocol (Vers 9): Safety assist[S]. Euro NCAP, 2021. |
| [16] | 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司. C-NCAP管理规则(2021版):碰撞试验、儿童保护评价及鞭打试验方法[S]. 天津: 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司, 2021. |
| China Automotive Technology Research Center co.,LTD. C-NCAP management protocols (2021): Crash test, child protection assessment and whiplash test protocol[S]. China Automotive Technology Research Center co., LTD, Tianjin, 2021. | |
| [17] | Euro NCAP. Assessment protocol (Vers 9): Adult occupant protection [S]. Euro NCAP, 2021. |
| [18] | 尹岩, 曹长剑. 汽车和挂车后下部防护装置标准改进研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(2): 151-156. |
| YIN Yan, CAO Changjian. Study on the requirements improvement of the lateral and underrun protections of the motor vehicles and trailers[J]. Chin Safe Sci J, 2014, 24(2): 151-156. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] | 卢辉忠, 杨见云, 毛志坚. 我国高速公路波形护栏端头的安全隐患及对策[J]. 交通与运输, 2018, 34(6): 54-56. |
| LU Huizhong, YANG Jianyun, MAO Zhijian. Safety hazards and countermeasures of corrugated guardrail end of expressway in China[J]. Traf Transport, 2018, 34(6): 54-56. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | LIU Tianquan , WANG Bingyu, WU He , ZOU Jun , MAO Mingxiang. Effects of the bumper stiffness characteristics on the pedestrian head injuries and the lower extremities injuries [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2023, 14(1): 17-22. |
| [2] | XU Zhe, GAO Guanyu, LIU Cancan, LOU Lei. Multi-point intrusion side impact method for the child restraint system and dummy injury [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2023, 14(1): 38-45. |
| [3] | . Man-machine cooperative control strategy of the longitudinal collision avoidances based on the factors of driver, vehicle and road [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2023, 14(1): 46-54. |
| [4] | YE Fan, WANG Bingyu, HAN Yong, YE Saifeng, YU Yi. Kinematic equation and injury risk analysis of the chest of 6-year-old child occupant under frontal crash [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(4): 617-624. |
| [5] | YANG Mingjun, BU Xiaobing, GUO Qingxiang. Analysis of differences in far side protection responses of different occupant genders based on a certain vehicle [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(4): 634-642. |
| [6] | ZOU Tiefang, ZHAO Yunlong, XIAO Jing, LI Yanchun. Effectiveness evaluations and protecting for pedestrian ground contact injury by coupling the airbag and controlling vehicle braking [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(3): 438-445. |
| [7] | ZHU Yan, XIE Zhongzhi, YU Wen, LI Shusheng, ZHANG Xun. Fatigue-driving detect-technology in low light environment based on facial feature points [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(2): 282-289. |
| [8] | LI Haiyan, LI Guangming, HE Lijuan, RAN Linghua, LV Wenle, CUI Shihai, RUAN Shijie. Effect of neck posture on biomechanical response in rear end collision [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(1): 55-62. |
| [9] | XU Hongzhen, WANG Fang, HU Lin, WANG Zhen, LI Fan. Differences in head injuries between pedestrian and two-wheeler based on real-world accident reconstruction [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(4): 483-489. |
| [10] | WANG Baolin, XIA Huaicheng, DONG Qianqian. Correction for pulse number of indirect tire pressure monitoring system under vehicle turning condition [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(4): 507-515. |
| [11] | LIN Yuncheng, SONG Jiafeng, LIU Shengfu,et al. Bionic design optimization and simulation analysis of bumper beam inspired by the structure of Bamboo Node [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2018, 9(4): 410-417. |
| [12] | RONG Qin, WU Xiaodong, XU Min. Functional safety concept design for steer-by-wire system of road vehicle based on the ISO [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2018, 9(3): 250-257. |
| [13] | ZHANG Ruiyu, MA Chunsheng, XU Shucai, et al. Compatibility matching of vehicle front-end when crashing between two cars with difference mass [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2018, 9(3): 295-302. |
| [14] | ZHOU Huifeng, LI Bihao, WANG Dazhi. Dummy performance comparative analysis based on WorldSID 50th dummy and ES-2 dummy [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2017, 08(03): 261-267. |
| [15] | BIAN Ning, ZHAO Baohua, LAI Feng, LIU Jifeng, CHEN Ji, ZHOU Jianguang. Development and application of semi-automated driving vehicle on highway [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2017, 08(02): 149-156. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||