Welcome to Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy,

Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 236-243.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2026.02.009

• Automotive Energy Efficiency and Environment Protection • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Performance analysis and its experiments of turbochargers with 3 types of cooling structures

ZHANG Chaowei(), LI Song*(), LÜ Baicang, KANG Xiuchen, DING Kaifang, BAI Yachen, WANG Ziyi   

  1. School of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121000, China
  • Received:2025-10-11 Revised:2026-01-25 Online:2026-04-30 Published:2026-04-30

Abstract:

A combined simulation and an experimental approach were adopted on a marine power platform and compared the cooling characteristics of three turbocharger exhaust devices: dry-type (DTC), single water-cooled (SWC), and double water-cooled (DWC), to optimize the thermal management strategy of turbochargers and to balance the energy-saving and the emission performances. The results indicate that while the DWC scheme significantly reduces the exhaust pipe outlet temperature by 32 ℃, its filter smoke number (FSN) of 1.6 exceeds the national standard limit of 1.5, and its brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) of 203.8 g/kWh is approximately 3.8% higher than that of the DTC scheme (196.4 g/kWh). In contrast, the SWC scheme maintains a reasonable exhaust pipe outlet temperature of 418 ℃, achieves an FSN of 1.17 which complies with emission regulations, and has a BSFC of 204.9 g/kWh comparable to the DWC scheme. Consequently, the SWC scheme achieves the best balance among thermal management, emission compliance, and fuel economy, making it the optimal engineering solution with the best comprehensive performance.

Key words: turbochargers, thermal management, cooling performances, smoke emission, fuel economy

CLC Number: