Correction for pulse number of indirect tire pressure monitoring system under vehicle turning condition

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2021.04.009

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper analyzed the reason why the indirect tire pressure monitoring system based on pulse method gives false alarm, because the vehicle outside wheel under normal tire pressure is misjudged as lack of air. Established a geometric relationship model of automobile turning by using the steering wheel angle as the correction parameter. Analyzed the effects of tire deflection, carriage roll and steering system deformation on the inner-lateral wheel pulse difference when the vehicle was turning. Proposed a Back-Propagation (BP) neural-network training method to modify the pulse number of the outside wheel under the turning condition. Constructed a three-layer BP neural network. The number of wheel pulses when turning was equivalent to that when driving in a straight line. The results show that the determination coefficient of the BP neural-network training method for the pulse difference fitting is 0.995, and the false alarm rate under the turning condition after correction is 0. Therefore, the correction method has a good effect.

Key words: automotive safety, indirect tire pressure monitoring, vehicle turing condition, pulse number correction method, back propagation (BP) neural network

CLC Number:

U461.91

WANG Baolin, XIA Huaicheng, DONG Qianqian. Correction for pulse number of indirect tire pressure monitoring system under vehicle turning condition[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(4): 507-515.

Figures/Tables 15

References 15

[1]	喻凡. 汽车系统动力学[M]. 南京: 机械工业出版社, 2017: 30-34.
	YU Fan. Vehicle System Dynamics[M]. Nanjing: China Machine Press, 2017: 30-34. (in Chinese)
[2]	苏博. TPMS法规现状及未来趋势展望[J]. 中国橡胶, 2020, 36(2):23-25.
	SU Bo. Current situation and future trend of TPMS regulations[J]. China Rubber, 2020, 36(2):23-25. (in Chinese)
[3]	韩宗奇, 鞠学坤, 王立强, 等. 转弯工况下汽车间接式TPMS监测方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2011, 47(6):143-149.
	HAN Zongqi, JU Xuekun, WANG Liqiang, et al. Monitoring method of indirect TPMS in case of running on curving path[J]. J Mech Engineering, 2011, 47(6):43-149. (in Chinese)
[4]	韩宗奇, 宋健, 苏丹丹, 等. 基于滚动半径法轮胎气压异常报警系统设计[J]. 汽车工程, 2008(08):721-724.
	HAN Zongqi, SONG Jian, SU Dandan, et al. The design of a tire pressure monitoring and alarming system for vehicles based on tire rolling radius method[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2008(08):721-724. (in Chinese)
[5]	彭加耕, 王宇岱, 韩宗奇, 等. 高速工况下间接式胎压监测的影响因素研究与优化[J]. 汽车技术, 2020(9):45-51.
	PENG Jiageng, WANG Yudai, HAN Zongqi, et al. Research and optimization on influencing factors on indirect tire pressure monitoring in high speed driving conditions[J]. Automobile Tech, 2020(9):45-51. (in Chinese)
[6]	阚一杰. 基于轮速极值统计的间接式TPMS的算法研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2015.
	KAN Yijie. Research on algorithm of indirect TPMS based on statistics of wheel speed extremum[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[7]	陈平, 许男, 白帆, 等. 对接路面轮胎瞬态侧偏特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2017, 53(22):143-151.
	CHEN Ping, XU Nan, BAI Fan, et al. Tire transient cornering characteristics on μ-step road[J]. J Mech Engineering, 2017, 53(22):143-151. (in Chinese)
[8]	彭加耕, 董倩倩, 张宇, 等. 基于BP神经网络的四轮胎压监测算法研究[J]. 现代制造工程, 2021(2):43-48+65.
	PENG Jiageng, DONG Qianqian, ZHANG Yu, et al. Study on the algorithm of four-wheel tire pressure monitoring based on BP neural network[J]. Modern Manuf Engineering, 2021(2):43-48+65. (in Chinese)
[9]	余志生. 汽车理论[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017: 135-140.
	YU Zhisheng. Automobile Theory[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2017: 135-140. (in Chinese)
[10]	郭孔辉. 汽车操纵动力学原理[M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 2011: 119-130.
	GUO Konghui. Principle of vehicle handling dynamics[M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 2011: 119-130. (in Chinese)
[11]	Susan K, Katie A. Making sense of methods and measurements: simple linear regression[J]. *Clinical Simu Nursing*, 2020, 48(11):94-95.
[12]	濮文耀, 魏鸣, 李红斌, 等. 线性回归模型的最小二乘法基本假设在Z-I关系拟合中的应用[J]. 气象科学, 2008, 28(6):644-648.
	PU Wenyao, WEI Ming, LI Hongbin, et al. Application of elementary assumptions of least square method in linear regress model to Z-I relation[J]. J Meteor Sci, 2008, 28(6):644-648. (in Chinese)
[13]	LI Yuanyuan, LI Jitong, HUANG Jian, et al. Fitting analysis and research of measured data of SAW micro-pressure sensor based on BP neural network[J]. *Measurement, 2020, 155*:107533-107534. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107533 URL
[14]	王立强, 王斌, 王俊昌, 等. BP神经网络在轮胎气压监测系统自学习匹配中的应用[J]. 汽车技术, 2018(5):20-24.
	WANG Liqiang, WANG Bin, WANG Junchang, et al. Application of BP neural network in tire pressure monitoring system self-learning matching[J]. Automobile Technology, 2018(5):20-24. (in Chinese)
[15]	张玘, 谢秀芬, 刘国福, 等. 弹性BP神经网络消除轮速传感器误差方法的研究[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2008(3):131-135.
	ZHANG Qi, XIE Xiufen, LIU Guofu, et al. Research on attenuating the wheel speed sensor errors based on resilient BP neural network[J]. J Nat‘l Univ Def Technol, 2008(3):131-135. (in Chinese)

路面	摩擦因数良好的水平柏油道路
胎压	4轮皆为230 kPa
载荷	汽车满载
数据采集截止条件	左后轮脉冲数达到100个
数据类型	4轮标准脉冲数
车速范围	5~60 km·h^-1
方向盘转角范围	10°~560°

路面	摩擦因数良好的水平柏油道路
胎压	4轮皆为230 kPa
载荷	汽车满载
数据采集截止条件	左后轮脉冲数达到100个
数据类型	4轮标准脉冲数
车速范围	5~60 km·h^-1
方向盘转角范围	10°~560°

方向盘转角/(°)	车速/ (km·h^-1)	标准脉冲数/个				原始∆N₄/个	修正后的标准脉冲数/个				修正后∆N_f₄/个
方向盘转角/(°)	车速/ (km·h^-1)	N₁	N₂	N₃	N₄	原始∆N₄/个	N₁’	N₂’	N₃’	N₄’	修正后∆N_f₄/个
10.04	6.14	100	100	100	100	0.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
30.05	55.50	100	102	100	101	0.33	100	101	100	100	0.33
50.20	40.68	100	103	100	102	1.00	100	101	100	100	0.33
70.19	31.34	100	103	100	103	2.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
89.74	14.62	100	104	100	104	2.67	100	100	100	100	0.00
110.00	23.70	100	106	100	106	4.00	100	101	100	101	0.67
130.56	18.94	100	108	100	106	3.33	100	102	100	100	0.67
150.22	20.21	100	109	100	107	4.00	100	101	100	99	1.33
170.90	25.00	100	110	100	109	5.67	100	101	100	100	0.33
189.30	10.01	101	113	100	110	5.33	101	103	100	100	1.33
210.03	12.45	100	112	100	112	8.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
229.88	13.79	100	114	100	114	9.33	100	101	100	101	0.67
249.50	10.37	100	113	100	114	9.67	100	99	100	100	0.33
269.85	13.10	101	118	100	116	9.67	101	102	100	100	1.00
290.50	8.90	100	118	100	117	11.00	100	100	100	99	1.00
311.00	14.24	101	120	100	118	11.00	101	101	100	99	1.67
328.86	14.95	100	121	100	121	14.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
351.27	13.56	100	123	100	123	15.33	100	100	100	100	0.00
370.97	14.17	100	124	100	124	16.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
391.32	13.70	100	126	100	126	17.33	100	100	100	100	0.00
410.71	9.17	101	128	100	127	17.33	101	100	100	99	1.33
429.01	17.18	100	128	100	129	19.67	100	99	100	100	0.33
449.70	8.46	100	130	100	131	21.00	100	98	100	99	0.33
470.83	11.13	100	132	100	133	22.33	100	98	100	99	0.33
490.57	11.66	101	138	100	137	24.00	101	100	100	99	1.33

方向盘转角/(°)	车速/ (km·h^-1)	标准脉冲数/个				原始∆N₄/个	修正后的标准脉冲数/个				修正后∆N_f₄/个
方向盘转角/(°)	车速/ (km·h^-1)	N₁	N₂	N₃	N₄	原始∆N₄/个	N₁’	N₂’	N₃’	N₄’	修正后∆N_f₄/个
10.04	6.14	100	100	100	100	0.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
30.05	55.50	100	102	100	101	0.33	100	101	100	100	0.33
50.20	40.68	100	103	100	102	1.00	100	101	100	100	0.33
70.19	31.34	100	103	100	103	2.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
89.74	14.62	100	104	100	104	2.67	100	100	100	100	0.00
110.00	23.70	100	106	100	106	4.00	100	101	100	101	0.67
130.56	18.94	100	108	100	106	3.33	100	102	100	100	0.67
150.22	20.21	100	109	100	107	4.00	100	101	100	99	1.33
170.90	25.00	100	110	100	109	5.67	100	101	100	100	0.33
189.30	10.01	101	113	100	110	5.33	101	103	100	100	1.33
210.03	12.45	100	112	100	112	8.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
229.88	13.79	100	114	100	114	9.33	100	101	100	101	0.67
249.50	10.37	100	113	100	114	9.67	100	99	100	100	0.33
269.85	13.10	101	118	100	116	9.67	101	102	100	100	1.00
290.50	8.90	100	118	100	117	11.00	100	100	100	99	1.00
311.00	14.24	101	120	100	118	11.00	101	101	100	99	1.67
328.86	14.95	100	121	100	121	14.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
351.27	13.56	100	123	100	123	15.33	100	100	100	100	0.00
370.97	14.17	100	124	100	124	16.00	100	100	100	100	0.00
391.32	13.70	100	126	100	126	17.33	100	100	100	100	0.00
410.71	9.17	101	128	100	127	17.33	101	100	100	99	1.33
429.01	17.18	100	128	100	129	19.67	100	99	100	100	0.33
449.70	8.46	100	130	100	131	21.00	100	98	100	99	0.33
470.83	11.13	100	132	100	133	22.33	100	98	100	99	0.33
490.57	11.66	101	138	100	137	24.00	101	100	100	99	1.33