汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 821-829.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2024.06.003
包宏立1(
), 陆思思1,2(
), 刘曾禹2, 闫凯波1,2,*(
), 朱文青1, 舒洋1
收稿日期:2024-03-15
修回日期:2024-05-17
出版日期:2024-12-31
发布日期:2025-01-01
通讯作者:
*闫凯波,讲师。E-mail:kaibo_yan@yeah.net。
作者简介:包宏立(1998—),男(土家族),重庆,硕士研究生。E-mail:Baohl0818@163.com。基金资助:
BAO Hongli1(
), LU Sisi1,2(
), LIU Zengyu2, YAN Kaibo1,2,*(
), ZHU Wenqing1, SHU Yang1
Received:2024-03-15
Revised:2024-05-17
Online:2024-12-31
Published:2025-01-01
摘要:
针对特种全地形车(ATV)桁架式车身安全与轻量化需求,该文提出协同静动态力学性能轻量化方法,开展某特种ATV桁架式车身轻量化设计。通过有限元分析获取车身结构静动态力学特性,建立基于力学性能安全的ATV桁架式车身轻量化优化模型;结合灵敏度分析和主效应分析提取桁架式车身关键设计变量,开展试验设计获取轻量化设计样本点,构建最小二乘法(LSR) -径向基函数(RBF)混合代理模型,提出协同静动态力学性能轻量化优化策略,通过序列二次规划(SQP)算法优化获取ATV桁架式车身轻量化设计方案。结果表明,在保证静动态力学性能条件下,该方法能有效降低ATV桁架式车身质量3.82%。
中图分类号:
包宏立, 陆思思, 刘曾禹, 闫凯波, 朱文青, 舒洋. 基于力学性能安全的ATV桁架式车身轻量化设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(6): 821-829.
BAO Hongli, LU Sisi, LIU Zengyu, YAN Kaibo, ZHU Wenqing, SHU Yang. Lightweight design of ATV truss body based on mechanical performance safety[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(6): 821-829.
| 设计 变量 | 质量 响应 | 频率 响应 | 弯曲刚度 响应 | 扭转刚度 响应 | 结果 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T42 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T23 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T51 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 设计 变量 | 质量 响应 | 频率 响应 | 弯曲刚度 响应 | 扭转刚度 响应 | 结果 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T42 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T23 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T51 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 设计 变量 | 下限 | 初始值 | 上限 | 优化方案 | 取整方案 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T21 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.04 | 2.00 |
| T22 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.99 | 2.00 |
| T24 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.95 | 2.00 |
| T30 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.76 | 1.80 |
| T42 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.65 | 1.70 |
| T1 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T4 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.91 | 1.90 |
| T19 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T29 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.96 | 2.00 |
| T35 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T40 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.37 | 2.40 |
| T45 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.78 | 1.80 |
| T50 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.18 | 2.20 |
| T51 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.06 | 2.10 |
| 设计 变量 | 下限 | 初始值 | 上限 | 优化方案 | 取整方案 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T21 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.04 | 2.00 |
| T22 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.99 | 2.00 |
| T24 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.95 | 2.00 |
| T30 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.76 | 1.80 |
| T42 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.65 | 1.70 |
| T1 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T4 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.91 | 1.90 |
| T19 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T29 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.96 | 2.00 |
| T35 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T40 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.37 | 2.40 |
| T45 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.78 | 1.80 |
| T50 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.18 | 2.20 |
| T51 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.06 | 2.10 |
| 方案及变化 | m1 / kg | f / Hz | SB / (kN·mm-1) | ST / [(kN·mm)rad-1] | Fc / kN | Dd / mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 初始方案 | 91.35 | 11.00 | 44.67 | 24 120.14 | 1 579.37 | 139.63 |
| 优化方案 | 87.79 | 10.97 | 44.66 | 24 186.25 | 1 539.22 | 133.40 |
| 优化方案变化/ % | -3.90 | -0.27 | 2.24 | 0.27 | -2.54 | -4.46 |
| 取整方案 | 87.86 | 10.98 | 44.20 | 23 997.21 | 1 540.27 | 133.49 |
| 取整方案变化/ % | -3.82 | -0.18 | -1.05 | ?0.51 | -2.48 | -4.40 |
| 方案及变化 | m1 / kg | f / Hz | SB / (kN·mm-1) | ST / [(kN·mm)rad-1] | Fc / kN | Dd / mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 初始方案 | 91.35 | 11.00 | 44.67 | 24 120.14 | 1 579.37 | 139.63 |
| 优化方案 | 87.79 | 10.97 | 44.66 | 24 186.25 | 1 539.22 | 133.40 |
| 优化方案变化/ % | -3.90 | -0.27 | 2.24 | 0.27 | -2.54 | -4.46 |
| 取整方案 | 87.86 | 10.98 | 44.20 | 23 997.21 | 1 540.27 | 133.49 |
| 取整方案变化/ % | -3.82 | -0.18 | -1.05 | ?0.51 | -2.48 | -4.40 |
| [1] | 程洪杰, 高蕾, 刘志浩, 等. 多轴特种车辆动力学建模及制动性能优化研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(17): 241-248. |
| CHENG Hongjie, GAO Lei, LIU Zhihao, et al. Dynamic modeling and braking performance optimization of multi-axle special vehicle[J]. J Vibr Shoc, 2021, 40(17): 241-248. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | ZHANG Jiangfan, WANG Liangmo, WANG Tao, et al. Frontal crashworthiness optimization for a light-duty vehicle based on a multi-objective reliability method[J]. Int’l J Crashworth, 2023, 28(4): 449-461. |
| [3] |
单春来, 刘朋科, 古斌, 等. 多级优化算法在火炮总体结构设计中的应用[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 11-19.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2022.01.002 |
|
SHAN Chunlai, LIU Pengke, GU Bin, et al. Application of multilevel optimization algorithm in artillery integrated design[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(1): 11-19. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2022.01.002 |
|
| [4] | ZOU Xihong, ZHOU Yuting, ZHOU Yuhang, et al. Research on fatigue life of all-terrain vehicle control arm based on measured load spectrum[J]. Cobot, 2022, 1: 16. |
| [5] | Maradey Lázaro J G, Esteban Villegas H S, Blanco Caballero B J. Finite element analysis (FEA) for optimization the design of a BAJA SAE chassis[C]// Int’l Mech Engi Cong Exposit. American Soc Mech Engi, 2018, 52033: V04AT06A050. |
| [6] | Zafer N, Aybar U. Vibration analysis and optimization of a tracked armored vehicle[J]. J Vibr Engi Tech, 2023, 11(7): 3177-3184. |
| [7] | 金兆辉, 杜佳泽, 王达, 等. 中小型全地形车的车架结构设计与仿真分析[C]// 中国汽车工程学会. 2021中国汽车工程学会年会论文集(8). 吉林大学, 2021: 250-254. |
| JIN Zhaohui, DU Jiaze, WANG Da, et al. Structural design and mechanical analysis of BAJA off-road vehicle frame [C]// Proc 2021 Ann Conf Chin Soc Autom Engi (8). Jilin University, 2021: 250-254. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | Soundararajan R, Ajith R, Sabarivasan U, et al. A novel approach for design and analysis of an all-terrain vehicle roll cage[J]. Mate Today: Proc, 2021, 45: 2239-2247. |
| [9] | 左文杰, 陈继顺, 李亦文, 等. 刚度、强度与频率约束下的白车身板厚尺寸优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2017, 39(2): 145-149. |
| ZUO Wenjie, CHEN Jishun, LI Yiwen, et al. Size optimization on plate thickness of BlW with constraints of stiffness, strength and frequency[J]. Autom Engineering, 2017, 39(2): 145-149. (in Chinese) | |
| [10] | 龙江启, 周平, 郑金品, 等. 考虑多工况刚度和模态灵敏度的全地形车车架轻量化设计[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 36(7): 109-118. |
| LONG Jiangqi, ZHOU Ping, ZHENG Jinpin, et al. Lightweight design of all-terrain vehicle frame considering multi-condition stiffness and modal sensitivity[J]. J Chongqing Univ Tech (Nat Sci), 2022, 36(7): 109-118. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | 李作轩, 贾良跃, 郝佳, 等. 基于多工况关联的无人车辆车身结构轻量化优化设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 10(30): 1-13. |
| LI Zuoxuan, JIA Liangyue, HAO Jia, et al. The lightweight optimization design of unmanned vehicle body structure based on multi-working conditions correlation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 10(30): 1-13. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | WANG Shuang, WANG Dengfeng. Research on crashworthiness and lightweight of B-pillar based on MPSO with TOPSIS method[J]. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Engi, 2019, 41(11): 498. |
| [13] |
王鹤翔, 毛晓东, 庞丽萍, 等. 基于多目标遗传算法的特种车舱室送风系统优化设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(12): 2981-2988.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0632 |
|
WANG Hexiang, MAO Xiaodong, PANG Liping, et al. Design on layout optimization of air supply system for special vehicle cabin based on multi-objective genetic algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(12): 2981-2988. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0632 |
|
| [14] | CHEN Jielin, Kwak Y, XU Moran, et al. Topology and modular size optimization of small electric vehicle frame based on cross-section contribution analysis[J]. Struct Multidis Optim, 2021, 64: 4287-4304. |
| [15] | 刘莹, 祝振林, 王登峰. 基于隐式全参数化技术的动力电池仓轻量化设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(2): 236-242. |
| LIU Ying, ZHU Zhenlin, WANG Dengfeng. Lightweight design of power battery compartments based on implicit full parameterization technology[J]. J Autom Safe Energ, 2020, 11(2): 236-242. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | LI Shenhua, WANG Dengfeng, WANG Shuang, et al. Structure-connection-performance integration lightweight optimisation design of multi-material automotive body skeleton[J]. Struct Multidis Optim, 2023, 66(9): 198. |
| [17] | 孙喜龙, 王登峰, 荣宝军, 等. 响应面法在汽车侧面结构多目标优化中的应用[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2022, 41(7): 1039-1047. |
| SUN Xilong, WANG Dengfeng, RONG Baojun, et al. Applying response surface method to multi-objective optimization of automobile's side structure[J]. Mech Sci Tech Aeros Engi, 2022, 41(7): 1039-1047. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 徐世伟, 纪志康, 肖培杰, 袁 泉, 袁秋奇, 刘 瑜, 李君鸿, 李可维, 李建宇, 曾卓然, 肖 志, 何 聪. 汽车轻量化技术研究现状及展望[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(1): 16-31. |
| [2] | 荣 海, 蒋建中, 姚再起, 马 凯, 杜柯南. 基于神经网络代理模型的车身多学科轻量化优化设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(1): 32-42. |
| [3] | 荣海, 蒋建中, 姚再起, 马凯. 某电动汽车侧面柱碰工况门槛梁截面参数优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(6): 813-820. |
| [4] | 周建中, 聂冰冰, 孙会明, 黄健, 王良模, 高强. 通过嵌合管来增强负Poisson比结构的耐撞性能[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(3): 329-336. |
| [5] | 王丹琦, 吴霖滔, 聂冰冰, 车文传, 邹铁方, 张君媛. 车用CFRP层压圆柱壳冲击损伤分析及最小穿透能量预测[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(1): 29-38. |
| [6] | 罗耿, 赵剑南, 陈亮, 柴成鹏, 王童, 陈轶嵩. 新型波纹结构吸能盒耐撞性研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(3): 453-462. |
| [7] | 张鹏, 齐德兴, 夏勇, 李营, 吴文旺. 板状立方点阵超结构填充汽车吸能盒的抗冲击吸能特性[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3): 287-295. |
| [8] | 刘莹, 祝振林, 王登峰. 基于隐式全参数化技术的动力电池仓轻量化设计 [J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(2): 236-242. |
| [9] | 吴玉宝,牛卫中,雷云涛. 两辆 SUV 乘用车侧碰耐撞性最差工况的判定[J]. JASE, 2020, 11(1): 79-85. |
| [10] | 王春红,王利剑, 左恒峰, 王妮, Noor Intan Saffinaz Anuar,Peyman Servati,Frank Ko. 汽车用汉麻秆粉 / 聚乳酸复合材料的制备、 成型工艺及性能[J]. JASE, 2019, 10(4): 511-517. |
| [11] | 刘 增,魏新奇,夏 勇 . 表征平纹编织碳纤维复合材料特性的两种连续损伤模型[J]. JASE, 2019, 10(3): 293-299. |
| [12] | 王舒玉,侯之超,苏卫东,王 帅 . 无水与充水塑料燃油箱的振动试验模态分析[J]. JASE, 2019, 10(2): 226-232. |
| [13] | 于成龙,刘 莹,乔 鑫. 基于多学科优化的锂离子动力电池包轻量化设计[J]. JASE, 2019, 10(2): 233-240. |
| [14] | 白 傑,郝培涵,陈思汉. 用轻量化卷积神经网络图像语义分割的交通场景理解[J]. JASE, 2018, 9(4): 433-440. |
| [15] | 尹佳成,刘子建,秦 欢,等. 用于电动客车车身正向概念设计的刚度链数学模型[J]. JASE, 2018, 9(3): 325-332. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||