汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5): 536-543.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2023.05.002
韩勇1(
), 罗金镕1(
), 何勇2, 吴贺3, 林旭洁1, 蔡鸿瑜1
收稿日期:2023-03-04
修回日期:2023-07-17
出版日期:2023-10-31
发布日期:2023-10-31
作者简介:韩勇(1984—),男(汉),江西,教授。E-mail: yonghan@xmut.edu.cn。基金资助:
HAN Yong1(
), LUO Jinrong1(
), HE Yong2, WU He3, LIN Xujie1, CAI Hongyu1
Received:2023-03-04
Revised:2023-07-17
Online:2023-10-31
Published:2023-10-31
摘要:
为快速预测汽车碰撞行人头部损伤风险,建立了一种基于多刚体系统动力学仿真方法和分类回归决策树(CART)的预测模型。参考欧洲新车评价规程(Euro-NCAP),开发了具有精细化刚度特征的车辆前部结构多体模型;以行人尺寸、初始车辆速度和行人速度、人车碰撞位置、相对角度为变量,通过全因子设计试验方法,建立了4 500组多体仿真模型;采用CART模型,挖掘变量与动力学响应参数的关联性。结果表明:车辆初始碰撞速度是影响行人头部动力学响应的关键因素;该模型对于碰撞速度和头部损伤准则(HIC15)值的预测精度分别为87.5%和86.8%,平均预测耗时为42.7 ms,两者均具有较高的预测精度和决策能力。该结果可为制定行人头部损伤风险评估实验和损伤防护研究提供理论参考依据。
中图分类号:
韩勇, 罗金镕, 何勇, 吴贺, 林旭洁, 蔡鸿瑜. 基于CART决策树的车辆与行人碰撞中头部损伤风险预测[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(5): 536-543.
HAN Yong, LUO Jinrong, HE Yong, WU He, LIN Xujie, CAI Hongyu. Prediction of pedestrian head injury in vehicle-pedestrian collisions based on a CART decision tree[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2023, 14(5): 536-543.
| 符号 | 参数变量 | 变化范围 | 水平 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 行人尺寸分级 | 10YO、AF05、AM05、AM50、AM95 | 5 |
| vped | 行人速度 | 3~6 km/h | 4 |
| vcar | 车辆速度 | 20~60 km/h | 9 |
| θ | 碰撞初始角度 | 0°~180° | 5 |
| Pos | 碰撞初始位置 | -0.6~0.6 m | 5 |
| 符号 | 参数变量 | 变化范围 | 水平 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 行人尺寸分级 | 10YO、AF05、AM05、AM50、AM95 | 5 |
| vped | 行人速度 | 3~6 km/h | 4 |
| vcar | 车辆速度 | 20~60 km/h | 9 |
| θ | 碰撞初始角度 | 0°~180° | 5 |
| Pos | 碰撞初始位置 | -0.6~0.6 m | 5 |
| 尺寸分级 | 年龄、性别、百分位 | 身高 / m | 体质量 / kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10YO | 10岁儿童 | 1.38 | 32.5 |
| AF05 | 第5百分位 成年女性 | 1.53 | 49.6 |
| AM05 | 第5百分位 成年男性 | 1.65 | 65.0 |
| AM50 | 第50百分位 成年男性 | 1.75 | 78.0 |
| AM95 | 第95百分位 成年男性 | 1.90 | 98.3 |
| 尺寸分级 | 年龄、性别、百分位 | 身高 / m | 体质量 / kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10YO | 10岁儿童 | 1.38 | 32.5 |
| AF05 | 第5百分位 成年女性 | 1.53 | 49.6 |
| AM05 | 第5百分位 成年男性 | 1.65 | 65.0 |
| AM50 | 第50百分位 成年男性 | 1.75 | 78.0 |
| AM95 | 第95百分位 成年男性 | 1.90 | 98.3 |
| 预测等级 | 序号 | vcar / (m·s-1) | vped / (m·s-1) | θ / (°) | Size | Pos / m | 实际等级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1“L”, vR / (m·s-1) = [0.0~6.0), vcar / (m·s-1) = [9.0~16.0] | 1 | 9.7 | 0.83 | 45 | 10YO | 0.3 | L |
| 2 | 11.1 | 1.11 | 135 | AM05 | 0.6 | L | |
| 3 | 9.7 | 1.11 | 45 | AF05 | -0.3 | L | |
| 4 | 12.5 | 0.83 | 45 | AF05 | -0.3 | L | |
| 5 | 11.1 | 0.83 | 180 | AM05 | 0.0 | L | |
| A2“M”, vR / (m·s-1) = [6.0~11.0), vcar / (m·s-1) = [7.6~9.0], AF05 | 1 | 8.3 | 1.11 | 135 | AM05 | 0.3 | M |
| 2 | 8.3 | 1.38 | 90 | AF05 | -0.3 | M | |
| 3 | 7.0 | 1.11 | 90 | AF05 | -0.6 | M | |
| 4 | 9.7 | 1.11 | 45 | AF05 | 0.0 | M | |
| 5 | 8.3 | 1.38 | 90 | AM50 | 0.3 | M | |
| A3“H”, vR / (m·s-1) = [11.0~16.7], vcar / (m·s-1) = [10.4~16.0] | 1 | 13.8 | 1.38 | 90 | 10YO | -0.6 | H |
| 2 | 16.7 | 1.67 | 180 | AM50 | 0.6 | H | |
| 3 | 15.2 | 1.52 | 0 | AM05 | 0.3 | H | |
| 4 | 15.2 | 1.67 | 90 | AM95 | -0.6 | H | |
| 5 | 12.5 | 1.52 | 90 | AM95 | 0.0 | H |
| 预测等级 | 序号 | vcar / (m·s-1) | vped / (m·s-1) | θ / (°) | Size | Pos / m | 实际等级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1“L”, vR / (m·s-1) = [0.0~6.0), vcar / (m·s-1) = [9.0~16.0] | 1 | 9.7 | 0.83 | 45 | 10YO | 0.3 | L |
| 2 | 11.1 | 1.11 | 135 | AM05 | 0.6 | L | |
| 3 | 9.7 | 1.11 | 45 | AF05 | -0.3 | L | |
| 4 | 12.5 | 0.83 | 45 | AF05 | -0.3 | L | |
| 5 | 11.1 | 0.83 | 180 | AM05 | 0.0 | L | |
| A2“M”, vR / (m·s-1) = [6.0~11.0), vcar / (m·s-1) = [7.6~9.0], AF05 | 1 | 8.3 | 1.11 | 135 | AM05 | 0.3 | M |
| 2 | 8.3 | 1.38 | 90 | AF05 | -0.3 | M | |
| 3 | 7.0 | 1.11 | 90 | AF05 | -0.6 | M | |
| 4 | 9.7 | 1.11 | 45 | AF05 | 0.0 | M | |
| 5 | 8.3 | 1.38 | 90 | AM50 | 0.3 | M | |
| A3“H”, vR / (m·s-1) = [11.0~16.7], vcar / (m·s-1) = [10.4~16.0] | 1 | 13.8 | 1.38 | 90 | 10YO | -0.6 | H |
| 2 | 16.7 | 1.67 | 180 | AM50 | 0.6 | H | |
| 3 | 15.2 | 1.52 | 0 | AM05 | 0.3 | H | |
| 4 | 15.2 | 1.67 | 90 | AM95 | -0.6 | H | |
| 5 | 12.5 | 1.52 | 90 | AM95 | 0.0 | H |
| 预测等级 | 序号 | vcar / (m·s-1) | vped / (m·s-1) | θ / (°) | Size | Pos / m | 实际等级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1“L”, HIC15 = [0~450.0), vcar / (m·s-1) = [7.6~9.0], Pos / (m)= [0~0.45] | 1 | 8.3 | 1.1 | 135 | 10YO | 0.0 | L |
| 2 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 45 | 10YO | 0.0 | L | |
| 3 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 45 | AM05 | -0.3 | L | |
| 4 | 9.7 | 0.8 | 135 | AM50 | 0.0 | L | |
| 5 | 8.3 | 1.1 | 45 | AF05 | -0.6 | L | |
| B2“M”, HIC15 = (450.0~1000.0], vcar / (m·s-1) = [7.6~9.0], θ / (°) = [67.3~180] | 1 | 9.7 | 1.1 | 135 | AM05 | 0.3 | M |
| 2 | 8.3 | 1.4 | 90 | AM50 | 0.6 | M | |
| 3 | 9.7 | 1.4 | 90 | AF05 | -0.3 | M | |
| 4 | 11.0 | 1.4 | 180 | AF05 | -0.3 | M | |
| 5 | 8.3 | 1.1 | 90 | AM50 | 0.3 | M | |
| B3“H”, HIC15 = [1000~2500), vcar / (m·s-1) = [10.4~16.7], θ / (°) = [67.3~180] | 1 | 12.5 | 1.4 | 180 | AM95 | 0.6 | H |
| 2 | 13.8 | 1.4 | 135 | AM50 | -0.6 | M | |
| 3 | 16.7 | 1.7 | 135 | AM05 | 0.6 | H | |
| 4 | 16.7 | 1.7 | 90 | AM95 | 0.6 | H | |
| 5 | 15.2 | 1.7 | 180 | AM95 | -0.6 | H |
| 预测等级 | 序号 | vcar / (m·s-1) | vped / (m·s-1) | θ / (°) | Size | Pos / m | 实际等级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1“L”, HIC15 = [0~450.0), vcar / (m·s-1) = [7.6~9.0], Pos / (m)= [0~0.45] | 1 | 8.3 | 1.1 | 135 | 10YO | 0.0 | L |
| 2 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 45 | 10YO | 0.0 | L | |
| 3 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 45 | AM05 | -0.3 | L | |
| 4 | 9.7 | 0.8 | 135 | AM50 | 0.0 | L | |
| 5 | 8.3 | 1.1 | 45 | AF05 | -0.6 | L | |
| B2“M”, HIC15 = (450.0~1000.0], vcar / (m·s-1) = [7.6~9.0], θ / (°) = [67.3~180] | 1 | 9.7 | 1.1 | 135 | AM05 | 0.3 | M |
| 2 | 8.3 | 1.4 | 90 | AM50 | 0.6 | M | |
| 3 | 9.7 | 1.4 | 90 | AF05 | -0.3 | M | |
| 4 | 11.0 | 1.4 | 180 | AF05 | -0.3 | M | |
| 5 | 8.3 | 1.1 | 90 | AM50 | 0.3 | M | |
| B3“H”, HIC15 = [1000~2500), vcar / (m·s-1) = [10.4~16.7], θ / (°) = [67.3~180] | 1 | 12.5 | 1.4 | 180 | AM95 | 0.6 | H |
| 2 | 13.8 | 1.4 | 135 | AM50 | -0.6 | M | |
| 3 | 16.7 | 1.7 | 135 | AM05 | 0.6 | H | |
| 4 | 16.7 | 1.7 | 90 | AM95 | 0.6 | H | |
| 5 | 15.2 | 1.7 | 180 | AM95 | -0.6 | H |
| [1] |
Otte D, Jänsch M, Haasper C. Injury protection and accident causation parameters for vulnerable road users based on German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2012, 44(1): 149-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.006 pmid: 22062349 |
| [2] | World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2018[R]. Geneva, 2018. |
| [3] | 中华人民共和国公安部. 中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报(2020年度)[R]. 公安部交通管理局, 2020. |
| Ministry of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China. Annual report on road traffic accidents of the People’s Republic of China (2020)[R]. Traffic Administration of the Ministry of Public Security, 2020. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] |
PENG Yong, Deck C, YANG Jikuang, et al. Effects of pedestrian gait, vehicle-front geometry and impact velocity on kinematics of adult and child pedestrian head[J]. Int J Crashworthiness, 2012, 17(5): 553-561.
doi: 10.1080/13588265.2012.698578 URL |
| [5] |
Sahoo D, Deck C, Yoganandan N. Influence of stiffness and shape of contact surface on skull fractures and biomechanical metrics of the human head of different population under lateral impacts[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2015, 80(5): 97-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.004 URL |
| [6] | 余超, 兰靛靛, 王方, 等. 乘用车前挡风玻璃角度对行人头部/颅脑损伤影响研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(6): 189-197. |
| YU Chao, LAN Diandian, WANG Fang, et al. Influence of windscreen inclination angle on the head/brain injury in a pedestrian impact accident[J]. J Vib Shock, 2020, 39(6): 189-197. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] | 吴贺, 韩勇, 石亮亮, 等. 基于视频信息的高精度事故重建方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(6): 778-783. |
| WU He, HAN Yong, SHI Liangliang, et al. Research on high precision accident reconstruction method based on video information[J]. Auto Engi, 2020, 42(6): 778-783. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | 韩勇, 李永强, 许永虹, 等. 基于VRUs深度事故重建的AEB效能对头部损伤风险的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 490-498. |
| HAN Yong, LI Yongqiang, XU Yonghong, et al. Effectiveness of AEB system for head injury risk based on VRUs in-depth accident reconstruction[J]. J Auto Safe Energy, 2021, 12(4): 490-498. (in Chinese) | |
| [9] |
LI Fan, YANG Jikuang. A study of head-brain injuries in car-to-pedestrian crashes with reconstructions using in-depth accident data in China[J]. Int J Crashworthiness, 2010, 15(2): 117-124.
doi: 10.1080/13588260903048190 URL |
| [10] |
LIU Xuejun, YANG Jikuang. A study of influences of vehicle speed and front structure on pedestrian impact responses using mathematical models[J]. Traffic Inj Prev, 2002, 3(1): 31-42.
doi: 10.1080/15389580210517 URL |
| [11] | 王岩. 基于人车事故数据的行人碰撞后运动及损伤规律研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2017. |
| WANG Yan. Post-crash movement and injury patterns of pedestrians based on human-vehicle accident data[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2017. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | CHEN Wentao, ZHOU Qing, NIE Bingbing, et al. Generating a large-scale numerical database of motor vehicle crashes for rapid injury severity prediction[C]// Int’l Res Counc Biomech Injury (IRCOBI Asia), Beijing, China, 2020: 25-28. |
| [13] | Iason B,NIE Bingging. A framework for near real-time occupant injury risk prediction using a sequence-to-sequence deep learning approach[C]// Int’l Res Council on Biomech Injury (IRCOBI), Florence, Italy, 2019: 19-20. |
| [14] |
Iason B, YANG Saichao, ZHOU Qing, et al. A framework for rapid on-board deterministic estimation of occupant injury risk in motor vehicle crashes with quantitative uncertainty evaluation[J]. Sci China Technol Sc, 2020, 64(3): 521-534.
doi: 10.1007/s11431-019-1565-9 |
| [15] |
GAO Wenrui, BAI Zhonghao, ZHU Feng, et al. A study on the cyclist head kinematic responses in electric-bicycle-to-car accidents using decision-tree model[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2021, 160 (1): 106305.
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106305 URL |
| [16] | 李欢, 白中浩, 高文睿, 等. 基于决策树模型的电动自行车与SUV碰撞中骑车人头部响应[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(1): 43-51. |
| LI Huan, BAI Zhonghao, GAO Wenrui, et al. Cyclist head response in electric bicycle-SUV collision based on decision tree model[J]. J Auto Safe Energy, 2021, 12(1): 43-51. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | Anderson R, Mcclean J, Dokko Y. Determining accurate contact definitions in multibody simulations for DOE type reconstruction of head impacts in pedestrian accidents[C]// 19th Int’l Tech Conf Enha Safe Vehi (ESV), Washington D.C, USA, 2005, Paper Number: 05-0175. |
| [18] |
Elliott J, Simms C, Wood D. Pedestrian head translation, rotation and impact velocity: The influence of vehicle speed, pedestrian speed and pedestrian gait[J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2012, 45: 342-353.
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.022 pmid: 22269518 |
| [19] | 王国林, 鲁砚. 人车碰撞事故仿真与行人保护研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2009, 31(1): 14-17. |
| WANG Guolin, LU Yan. Study on simulation of human-vehicle crashes and pedestrian protection[J]. Auto Engi, 2009, 31(1): 14-17. | |
| [20] | Ito D, Yamada H, Oida K, et al. Finite element analysis of kinematic behavior of cyclist and performance of cyclist helmet for human head injury in vehicle-to-cyclist collision[C]// Int’l Res Council Biomech Injury (IRCOBI), Berlin, Germany. 2014: 119-131. |
| [21] |
Mizuno K, Yamada H, Mizuguchi H, et al. The influence of lower extremity postures on kinematics and injuries of cyclists in vehicle side collisions[J]. Traffic Inj Prev, 2016, 17(6): 618-624.
doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1126671 pmid: 26760737 |
| [22] | 聂进, 李桂兵, 王薛超. 乘用车前端结构几何参数对行人头部动力学响应和损伤风险的影响[J]. 汽车工程, 2014, 36(12): 1473-1482. |
| NIE Jin, LI Guibin, WANG Xuechao. Influence of front-end structural geometry parameters of passenger vehicles on pedestrian head dynamics response and injury risk[J]. Auto Engi, 2014, 36(12): 1473-1482. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | HAN Yong, Matsui Y. Effects of vehicle impact velocity, vehicle front-end shapes on pedestrian injury risk[J]. Traf Inju Prev, 2012, 13(5): 507-518. |
| [24] | 曾必强, 高继东, 彭伟. 基于事故再现的行人头部碰撞研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2016, 38(8): 961-966. |
| ZENG Biqiang, GAO Jidong, PENG Wei. Accident reproduction-based pedestrian head-on collision study[J]. Auto Engi, 2016, 38(8): 961-966. (in Chinese) | |
| [25] | Hertz E. A note on the head injury criterion (HIC) as a predictor of the risk of skull fracture[C]// Proc Asso Adva Auto Med Annu Conf, San Antonio, USA. 1993: 303-312. |
| [26] | 水野幸治. 汽车碰撞安全[M]. 韩勇, 陈一维译. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2012: 221-254. |
| Mizuno K. Crash Safety of Passenger Vehicles[M]. HAN Yong, CHEN Yiwei Translated. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2012: 221-254. (in Chinese) | |
| [27] | Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, et al. Classification and regression trees[J]. Open J Fore, 2016, 6(3): 582-588. |
| [28] | 王亚军, 王栋, 施欲亮. Euro-NCAP 行人保护试验协议 V7.0 解析[J]. 汽车工程学报, 2014, 4(4): 304-308. |
| WANG Yajun, WANG Dong, SHI Yuliang. Analysis of Euro-NCAP pedestrian testing protocol Version 7.0[J]. Chin J Auto Engi, 2014, 4(4): 304-308. (in Chinese) | |
| [29] | Eppger R, Sun E, Bandak F, et al. Development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraint systems[S/OL]. (2023-03-28). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1999. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/rev_criteria.pdf. |
| [30] | Euro NCAP. European new car assessment programme: Pedestrian testing protocol (2019)[S/OL]. (2023-03-28).http://wwweuroncap.com/media/53153/euro-ncap-ped-test-protoc.pdf. |
| [31] | 中国汽车技术研究中心 CATARC. 中国新车评价规程[S/OL]. (2023-03-28).http://www.c-ncap.org.cn/cms/picture/357380003076288512.pdf. |
| China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CATARC).C-NCAP (China New Car Assessment Program) management regulation (2021 edition)[S/OL]. (2023-03-28).http://www.c-ncap.org.cn/cms/picture/357380003076288512.pdf. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 郑雯祥, 王丙雨, 杨垚, 龚悠, 秦利燕. 货车与电动两轮车碰撞形态对骑车人运动学及损伤分析[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(6): 859-866. |
| [2] | 李宜轩, 吴肖, 唐凯, 李政. 小偏置碰撞测试中纯电动车辆侧滑策略研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(6): 867-876. |
| [3] | 邓功勋, 蔡娅妮, 雷飞兵, 刘恒金, 漆露霖, 樊瑜波. 汽车碰撞强度和先进约束系统参数对乘员损伤的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(5): 698-706. |
| [4] | 李昊, 周浩. 基于声学频谱-时域信息融合的噪声环境中应急车辆检测[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(4): 529-538. |
| [5] | 朱慧婷, 牟燕燕, 兰晹, 项磊, 杨洁, 程志华, 王军良, 杨娜. 追尾碰撞下车用机械按摩座椅对乘员损伤的防护效果[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(4): 539-547. |
| [6] | 高超俊, 李祎承, 蔡英凤, 王海, 蒋金. 基于融合感知的自动驾驶汽车AEB控制研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(4): 629-637. |
| [7] | 房熙博, 宁一高, 赵轩, 周猛. 基于SQP和GRNN的商用客车动力学参数自适应辨识[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(4): 648-656. |
| [8] | 刘煜, 张辉达, 邬晓凡, 蒋韩, 李桂兵. 多种碰撞工况下的中国与西方体征驾驶员响应对比分析[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(3): 376-385. |
| [9] | 杨垚, 王丙雨, 张翔, 张越. 基于视频的电动两轮车-行人碰撞事故特征和场景分析[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(3): 396-404. |
| [10] | 邹铁方, 付玺郡, 李艳春. 基于投影警示的智能汽车分级预警制动系统[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(3): 405-413. |
| [11] | 刘国盛, 苏欣儿, 王建锋, 刘臻玮. 基于深度生成网络的夜间车道线检测方法[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(3): 452-462. |
| [12] | 易文韬, 唐颖, 雷飞兵, 曾董, 蔡娅妮, 罗斌尹. 侧柱碰撞中头部运动学特征对弥散性脑损伤的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(1): 66-76. |
| [13] | 狄亚格, 周健, 陆杰, 秦嘉, 魏妤沁, 王淙进, 郝朝阳, 缪雪龙. 基于整车动力学的EMB线控制动系统功能安全概念设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(6): 830-838. |
| [14] | 邹铁方, 江碟, 周靖, 袁湘婷. 参数扰动对一种先前的车辆制动控制和防护方法的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(4): 477-483. |
| [15] | 聂进, 张翔, 张越, 王丙雨, 易向贤, 周伍. 货车-两轮车碰撞事故典型场景提取及关联规则分析[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(4): 503-510. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||