汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 556-566.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2026.05.005
收稿日期:2025-10-08
修回日期:2026-10-19
出版日期:2026-10-31
发布日期:2026-11-08
通讯作者:
*邓耀骥,讲师。E-mail:yjdeng@yzu.edu.cn。
作者简介:陆柯宇(2002—),男(汉),江苏,硕士研究生。E-mail:mz120230915@stu.yzu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
LU Keyu(
), DENG Yaoji*(
), SHEN Hui
Received:2025-10-08
Revised:2026-10-19
Online:2026-10-31
Published:2026-11-08
摘要:
为研究Tweel非充气轮胎在不同损伤状态与动态工况下的振动响应特性,该文建立了非充气轮胎三维非线性有限元模型,并通过静力学试验验证了模型有效性。基于验证后的有限元模型,仿真分析了健康及损伤状态下的非充气轮胎三轴加速度信号特征,研究了不同滑移率与侧偏角对加速度信号的影响规律。结果表明:3 mm裂纹损伤引起结构刚度变化,导致接地区域周向加速度峰值减小12.5%,非接地区域信号均值上升15.3%,幅值调制现象显著;滑移率的增加使振动波形错位,滑移率由1%增加到5%时,周向加速度的相位滞后量达到了0.8 ms,表明周向加速度对滑移率变化具有较高敏感性;侧偏角由2°增加到6°,导致侧向加速度标准差上升48.3%,且非接地区域信号离散程度上升约22.5%。该研究揭示了各因素对轮胎振动的影响机制,为基于振动信号的非充气轮胎健康监测提供了理论依据与数据支撑。
中图分类号:
陆柯宇, 邓耀骥, 沈辉. Tweel非充气轮胎在不同损伤状态与工况下的振动响应特性[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2026, 17(5): 556-566.
LU Keyu, DENG Yaoji, SHEN Hui. Vibration response characteristics of Tweel non-pneumatic tire under different damage states and working conditions[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2026, 17(5): 556-566.
| 材料 | μi / MPa | αi | Di / (kPa-1) | gi | τi/ s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 聚氨酯 | 13.55 | 1.51 | 3.5 | 0.125 | 0.002 |
| -2.34 | 2.21 | 0 | 0.125 | 0.02 | |
| 0.09 | -2.47 | 0 | 0.125 | 0.2 | |
| 合成橡胶 | 13.36 | 1.63 | 5.9 | 0.2 | 0.002 |
| -6.63 | 1.9 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.02 | |
| 0.06 | -2.462 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 材料 | μi / MPa | αi | Di / (kPa-1) | gi | τi/ s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 聚氨酯 | 13.55 | 1.51 | 3.5 | 0.125 | 0.002 |
| -2.34 | 2.21 | 0 | 0.125 | 0.02 | |
| 0.09 | -2.47 | 0 | 0.125 | 0.2 | |
| 合成橡胶 | 13.36 | 1.63 | 5.9 | 0.2 | 0.002 |
| -6.63 | 1.9 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.02 | |
| 0.06 | -2.462 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 载荷/ kN | Ltran / mm | δRE % | Llong / mm | δRE % | 下沉量/ mm | δRE % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 仿真 | 实验 | 仿真 | 实验 | 仿真 | 实验 | ||||
| 2.8 | 147.9 | 149.1 | 0.80 | 60.9 | 63.1 | 3.49 | 15.4 | 15.9 | 3.14 |
| 4.0 | 156.5 | 154.9 | 1.03 | 95.8 | 93.9 | 2.02 | 21.4 | 20.7 | 3.38 |
| 5.0 | 158.3 | 159.7 | 0.88 | 142.1 | 143.7 | 1.11 | 25.9 | 26.3 | 1.52 |
| 载荷/ kN | Ltran / mm | δRE % | Llong / mm | δRE % | 下沉量/ mm | δRE % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 仿真 | 实验 | 仿真 | 实验 | 仿真 | 实验 | ||||
| 2.8 | 147.9 | 149.1 | 0.80 | 60.9 | 63.1 | 3.49 | 15.4 | 15.9 | 3.14 |
| 4.0 | 156.5 | 154.9 | 1.03 | 95.8 | 93.9 | 2.02 | 21.4 | 20.7 | 3.38 |
| 5.0 | 158.3 | 159.7 | 0.88 | 142.1 | 143.7 | 1.11 | 25.9 | 26.3 | 1.52 |
| [1] | Sardinha M, Fátima Vaz M, Ramos T R P, et al. Design, properties, and applications of non-pneumatic tires: a review[J]. Proc Instit Mech Engi, Part L: J Mater: Desig Appl, 2023, 237(11): 2277-2297. |
| [2] |
赵又群. 一种非充气机械弹性安全车轮的研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(24): 105-116.
doi: 10.3901/JME.2019.24.105 |
| ZHAO Youqun. Research progress on kind of non-pneumatic mechanical elastic safety wheel[J]. J Mech Engi, 2019, 55(24): 105-116. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | 卢荡, 王晓凡, 吴海东. TWEEL轮胎接地压力均布特性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(3): 811-819. |
| LU Dang, WANG Xiaofan, WU Haidong. Analysis of uniform distribution characteristics of contact pressure of TWEEL tires[J]. J Jilin Univ (Engi Tech Edit), 2025, 55(3): 811-819. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | Rhyne T B, Cron S M. Development of a non-pneumatic wheel[J]. Tire Sci Tech, 2006, 34(3): 150-169. |
| [5] | DENG Yaoji, WANG Zhiyue, SHEN Hui, et al. A compre-hensive review on non-pneumatic tyre research[J]. Mater Desig, 2023, 227: 111742. |
| [6] | 梁政, 韩雪, 卢咏来, 等. UPTIS和TWEEL非充气轮胎的高速振动特性有限元分析对比[J]. 橡胶工业, 2023, 70(3): 212-219. |
| LIANG Zheng, HAN Xue, LU Yonglai, et al. Comparative analysis of high-speed vibration characteristics of uptis and tweel non-pneumatic tires using finite element method[J]. Chin Rubb Ind, 2023, 70(3): 212-219. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] | 李瑶薇, 臧利国, 吕添, 等. 蜂窝多孔结构辐板式非充气轮胎优化设计与研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 36(9): 25-33. |
| LI Yaowei, ZANG Liguo, LYU Tian, et al. Optimization design and research of honeycomb porous structure spoke plate non-pneumatic tire[J]. J Chongqing Univ Tech (Nat Sci), 2022, 36(9): 25-33. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | 周海超, 王荣乾, 王国林, 等. 非充气轮胎的滚动越障振动仿真分析[J]. 橡胶工业, 2024, 71(2): 138-150. |
| ZHOU Haichao, WANG Rongqian, WANG Guolin, et al. Simulation analysis of rolling obstacle crossing vibration of non-pneumatic tire[J]. Chin Rubb Ind, 2024, 71(2): 138-150. (in Chinese) | |
| [9] | Gasmi A, Joseph P F, Rhyne T B, et al. Closed-form solution of a shear deformable, extensional ring in contact between two rigid surfaces[J]. Int’l J Solid Struct, 2011, 48(5): 843-853. |
| [10] | Veeramurthy M. Modeling, finite element analysis, and optimization of Non-Pneumatic Tire (NPT) for the mini-mization of rolling resistance[D]. Clemson: Clemson University, 2011. |
| [11] | Veeramurthy M, JU Jaehyung, Thompson L L, et al. Opti-misation of geometry and material properties of a non pneumatic tyre for reducing rolling resistance[J]. Int’l J Vehi Desig, 2014, 66(2): 193-216. |
| [12] | Aboul-Yazid A M, Emam M A A, Shaaban S, et al. Effect of spokes structures on characteristics performance of non-pneumatic tires[J]. Int’l J Autom Mech Engi, 2015, 11(1): 2212-2223. |
| [13] | Hryciow Z, Jackowski J, Żmuda M. The influence of non-pneumatic tyre structure on its operational properties[J]. Int’l J Autom Mech Engi, 2020, 17(3): 8168-8178. |
| [14] | DENG Yaoji, ZHAO Youqun, LIN Fen, et al. Influence of structure and material on the vibration modal characteris-tics of novel combined flexible road wheel[J]. Defen Tech, 2022, 18(7): 1179-1189. |
| [15] | 赵颖, 郝纪波, 周科名, 等. 非结构化道路下双箭头非充气轮胎力学性能[J]. 汽车工程, 2025, 47(1): 149-160. |
| ZHAO Ying, HAO Jibo, ZHOU Keming, et al. Mechanical properties of double-arrow non-pneumatic tires under the condition of unstructured road[J]. Autom Engineering, 2025, 47(1): 149-160. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] |
DENG Yaoji, WANG Zhiyue, LIU Tao, et al. Static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of honeycomb non-pneumatic tire under structural damage condition[J]. Europ J Mech-A/Solid, 2023, 102: 105120.
doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105120 URL |
| [17] | 邓耀骥, 刘涛, 朱明鑫, 等. 辐条式非充气轮胎振动模态研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 36(9): 8-14. |
| DENG Yaoji, LIU Tao, ZHU Mingxin, et al. Vibration modal analysis of spoke non-pneumatic tire[J]. J Chongqing Univ Tech (Nat Sci), 2022, 36(9): 8-14. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] | 付宏勋, 赵又群, 林棻, 等. 机械弹性车轮稳态侧偏特性的理论与试验分析[J]. 浙江大学学报 (工学版), 2017, 51(2): 344-349. |
| FU Hongxun, ZHAO Youqun, LIN Fen, et al. Theoretical and experimental analysis on steady-state cornering properties of mechanical elastic wheel[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Engi Sci) 2017, 51(2): 344-349. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] | Rutherford W, Bezgam S, Proddaturi A, et al. Use of orthogonal arrays for efficient evaluation of geometric designs for reducing vibration of a non-pneumatic wheel during high-speed rolling[J]. Tire Sci Tech, 2010, 38(4): 246-275. |
| [20] | ZHU Liangliang, XU Ting, LIU Xiaoyu, et al. Test and simulation study on the static load and pure longitudinal slip characteristics of non-pneumatic tire[J]. Machines, 2023, 11(1): 86. |
| [21] | LIU Weidong, LI Changzheng, ZHANG Qiushi. Influence of spoke parameters on load capacity of non-pneumatic tires using orthogonal study and analysis of variance[J]. Int’l J Autom Tech, 2024, 25(2): 235-247. |
| [22] | DENG Yaoji, LIU Tao, LU Keyu, et al. Health monitoring method of non-pneumatic tire based on fusion dimensionality reduction and deep learning[J/OL]. IEEE Trans Intel Vehi, 2024: 1-13. (2024-08-31) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2024.3449869. |
| [23] | 刘泽萌. 轮胎稳态滚动阻力建模及测量方法研究[D]. 长春: 长春工业大学, 2025. |
| LIU Zemeng. Research on modeling and measuring method of tire steady rolling resistance[D]. Changchun: Changchun University of Technology, 2025. (in Chinese) | |
| [24] | Zegelaar P W A. The dynamic response of tyres to brake torque variations and road unevenesses[D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 1998. |
| [1] | 石霄鹏, 陈浩, 郭凯, 刘天福, 解江. 小飞机坠撞场景下中西方乘员损伤风险差异分析[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2026, 17(3): 322-331. |
| [2] | 李宜轩, 吴肖, 唐凯, 李政. 小偏置碰撞测试中纯电动车辆侧滑策略研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(6): 867-876. |
| [3] | 荣海, 蒋建中, 姚再起, 马凯. 某电动汽车侧面柱碰工况门槛梁截面参数优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(6): 813-820. |
| [4] | 张晨, 魏嵬, 陈家星, 马正伟. 基于交通事故重建的行人过街安全岛高度设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(2): 178-187. |
| [5] | 刘兆勇, 刘武东, 邵卫澍, 谭小强, 吴光强. 基于无迹Kalman滤波的车辆速度和质心侧偏角的估计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(1): 31-37. |
| [6] | 沈小燕, 余政涛, 秦箫, 陈野, 张国胜, 李金. 基于有限元仿真罐式危险货物运输车辆后防护装置碰撞特性[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(3): 364-372. |
| [7] | 刘金明, 马华星, 李奎, 李桂兵. 行人头部与车辆碰撞中旋转速度对颅脑组织响应影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(1): 70-78. |
| [8] | 韩勇, 吕春成, 唐斌, 黄红武, 罗洁思, 余意. 增高垫型CRS对小偏置碰撞中儿童乘员的损伤与防护[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(4): 444-453. |
| [9] | 吴玉宝,牛卫中,雷云涛. 两辆 SUV 乘用车侧碰耐撞性最差工况的判定[J]. JASE, 2020, 11(1): 79-85. |
| [10] | 张志勇,唐 磊,郝 威,袁 泉. 轮毂驱动电动汽车差动助力转向变论域模糊 PID 控制[J]. JASE, 2019, 10(2): 169-177. |
| [11] | 牛卫中,许鹏善,刘金鑫. 小重叠正面斜角碰撞工况对车体耐撞性的影响[J]. JASE, 2017, 08(01): 53-58. |
| [12] | 牛卫中,刘金鑫,潘胜娟. 汽车侧面柱碰位置与速度对车体安全性的影响[J]. JASE, 2016, 07(01): 55-59. |
| [13] | 曹立波,刘飞霞,颜凌波. 腹部塞块刚度对女性乘员损伤参数及下潜的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2015, 6(04): 354-359. |
| [14] | 张金换, 李浩, 周勇, 付海龙, 黄杨, 肖凌云, 胡文浩, 董红磊. 支撑腿误使用对ISOFIX 型儿童座椅安全性能的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2015, 6(04): 360-364. |
| [15] | 高博麟, 谢书港, 龚进峰. 基于运动学—动力学方法融合的汽车质心侧偏角估计(英文)[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2015, 6(01): 72-78. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||