Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 821-829.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2024.06.003
• Automotive Safety • Previous Articles Next Articles
BAO Hongli1(
), LU Sisi1,2(
), LIU Zengyu2, YAN Kaibo1,2,*(
), ZHU Wenqing1, SHU Yang1
Received:2024-03-15
Revised:2024-05-17
Online:2024-12-31
Published:2025-01-01
CLC Number:
BAO Hongli, LU Sisi, LIU Zengyu, YAN Kaibo, ZHU Wenqing, SHU Yang. Lightweight design of ATV truss body based on mechanical performance safety[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(6): 821-829.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.journalase.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2024.06.003
| 设计 变量 | 质量 响应 | 频率 响应 | 弯曲刚度 响应 | 扭转刚度 响应 | 结果 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T42 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T23 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T51 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 设计 变量 | 质量 响应 | 频率 响应 | 弯曲刚度 响应 | 扭转刚度 响应 | 结果 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T42 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| T1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T23 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| T28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| T50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| T51 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 设计 变量 | 下限 | 初始值 | 上限 | 优化方案 | 取整方案 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T21 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.04 | 2.00 |
| T22 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.99 | 2.00 |
| T24 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.95 | 2.00 |
| T30 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.76 | 1.80 |
| T42 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.65 | 1.70 |
| T1 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T4 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.91 | 1.90 |
| T19 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T29 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.96 | 2.00 |
| T35 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T40 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.37 | 2.40 |
| T45 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.78 | 1.80 |
| T50 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.18 | 2.20 |
| T51 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.06 | 2.10 |
| 设计 变量 | 下限 | 初始值 | 上限 | 优化方案 | 取整方案 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T21 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.04 | 2.00 |
| T22 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.99 | 2.00 |
| T24 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.95 | 2.00 |
| T30 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.76 | 1.80 |
| T42 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.65 | 1.70 |
| T1 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T4 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.91 | 1.90 |
| T19 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T29 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.96 | 2.00 |
| T35 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| T40 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.37 | 2.40 |
| T45 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 1.78 | 1.80 |
| T50 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.18 | 2.20 |
| T51 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.40 | 2.06 | 2.10 |
| 方案及变化 | m1 / kg | f / Hz | SB / (kN·mm-1) | ST / [(kN·mm)rad-1] | Fc / kN | Dd / mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 初始方案 | 91.35 | 11.00 | 44.67 | 24 120.14 | 1 579.37 | 139.63 |
| 优化方案 | 87.79 | 10.97 | 44.66 | 24 186.25 | 1 539.22 | 133.40 |
| 优化方案变化/ % | -3.90 | -0.27 | 2.24 | 0.27 | -2.54 | -4.46 |
| 取整方案 | 87.86 | 10.98 | 44.20 | 23 997.21 | 1 540.27 | 133.49 |
| 取整方案变化/ % | -3.82 | -0.18 | -1.05 | ?0.51 | -2.48 | -4.40 |
| 方案及变化 | m1 / kg | f / Hz | SB / (kN·mm-1) | ST / [(kN·mm)rad-1] | Fc / kN | Dd / mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 初始方案 | 91.35 | 11.00 | 44.67 | 24 120.14 | 1 579.37 | 139.63 |
| 优化方案 | 87.79 | 10.97 | 44.66 | 24 186.25 | 1 539.22 | 133.40 |
| 优化方案变化/ % | -3.90 | -0.27 | 2.24 | 0.27 | -2.54 | -4.46 |
| 取整方案 | 87.86 | 10.98 | 44.20 | 23 997.21 | 1 540.27 | 133.49 |
| 取整方案变化/ % | -3.82 | -0.18 | -1.05 | ?0.51 | -2.48 | -4.40 |
| [1] | 程洪杰, 高蕾, 刘志浩, 等. 多轴特种车辆动力学建模及制动性能优化研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(17): 241-248. |
| CHENG Hongjie, GAO Lei, LIU Zhihao, et al. Dynamic modeling and braking performance optimization of multi-axle special vehicle[J]. J Vibr Shoc, 2021, 40(17): 241-248. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | ZHANG Jiangfan, WANG Liangmo, WANG Tao, et al. Frontal crashworthiness optimization for a light-duty vehicle based on a multi-objective reliability method[J]. Int’l J Crashworth, 2023, 28(4): 449-461. |
| [3] |
单春来, 刘朋科, 古斌, 等. 多级优化算法在火炮总体结构设计中的应用[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(1): 11-19.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2022.01.002 |
|
SHAN Chunlai, LIU Pengke, GU Bin, et al. Application of multilevel optimization algorithm in artillery integrated design[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(1): 11-19. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2022.01.002 |
|
| [4] | ZOU Xihong, ZHOU Yuting, ZHOU Yuhang, et al. Research on fatigue life of all-terrain vehicle control arm based on measured load spectrum[J]. Cobot, 2022, 1: 16. |
| [5] | Maradey Lázaro J G, Esteban Villegas H S, Blanco Caballero B J. Finite element analysis (FEA) for optimization the design of a BAJA SAE chassis[C]// Int’l Mech Engi Cong Exposit. American Soc Mech Engi, 2018, 52033: V04AT06A050. |
| [6] | Zafer N, Aybar U. Vibration analysis and optimization of a tracked armored vehicle[J]. J Vibr Engi Tech, 2023, 11(7): 3177-3184. |
| [7] | 金兆辉, 杜佳泽, 王达, 等. 中小型全地形车的车架结构设计与仿真分析[C]// 中国汽车工程学会. 2021中国汽车工程学会年会论文集(8). 吉林大学, 2021: 250-254. |
| JIN Zhaohui, DU Jiaze, WANG Da, et al. Structural design and mechanical analysis of BAJA off-road vehicle frame [C]// Proc 2021 Ann Conf Chin Soc Autom Engi (8). Jilin University, 2021: 250-254. (in Chinese) | |
| [8] | Soundararajan R, Ajith R, Sabarivasan U, et al. A novel approach for design and analysis of an all-terrain vehicle roll cage[J]. Mate Today: Proc, 2021, 45: 2239-2247. |
| [9] | 左文杰, 陈继顺, 李亦文, 等. 刚度、强度与频率约束下的白车身板厚尺寸优化[J]. 汽车工程, 2017, 39(2): 145-149. |
| ZUO Wenjie, CHEN Jishun, LI Yiwen, et al. Size optimization on plate thickness of BlW with constraints of stiffness, strength and frequency[J]. Autom Engineering, 2017, 39(2): 145-149. (in Chinese) | |
| [10] | 龙江启, 周平, 郑金品, 等. 考虑多工况刚度和模态灵敏度的全地形车车架轻量化设计[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 36(7): 109-118. |
| LONG Jiangqi, ZHOU Ping, ZHENG Jinpin, et al. Lightweight design of all-terrain vehicle frame considering multi-condition stiffness and modal sensitivity[J]. J Chongqing Univ Tech (Nat Sci), 2022, 36(7): 109-118. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | 李作轩, 贾良跃, 郝佳, 等. 基于多工况关联的无人车辆车身结构轻量化优化设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 10(30): 1-13. |
| LI Zuoxuan, JIA Liangyue, HAO Jia, et al. The lightweight optimization design of unmanned vehicle body structure based on multi-working conditions correlation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 10(30): 1-13. (in Chinese) | |
| [12] | WANG Shuang, WANG Dengfeng. Research on crashworthiness and lightweight of B-pillar based on MPSO with TOPSIS method[J]. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Engi, 2019, 41(11): 498. |
| [13] |
王鹤翔, 毛晓东, 庞丽萍, 等. 基于多目标遗传算法的特种车舱室送风系统优化设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(12): 2981-2988.
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0632 |
|
WANG Hexiang, MAO Xiaodong, PANG Liping, et al. Design on layout optimization of air supply system for special vehicle cabin based on multi-objective genetic algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(12): 2981-2988. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0632 |
|
| [14] | CHEN Jielin, Kwak Y, XU Moran, et al. Topology and modular size optimization of small electric vehicle frame based on cross-section contribution analysis[J]. Struct Multidis Optim, 2021, 64: 4287-4304. |
| [15] | 刘莹, 祝振林, 王登峰. 基于隐式全参数化技术的动力电池仓轻量化设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(2): 236-242. |
| LIU Ying, ZHU Zhenlin, WANG Dengfeng. Lightweight design of power battery compartments based on implicit full parameterization technology[J]. J Autom Safe Energ, 2020, 11(2): 236-242. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | LI Shenhua, WANG Dengfeng, WANG Shuang, et al. Structure-connection-performance integration lightweight optimisation design of multi-material automotive body skeleton[J]. Struct Multidis Optim, 2023, 66(9): 198. |
| [17] | 孙喜龙, 王登峰, 荣宝军, 等. 响应面法在汽车侧面结构多目标优化中的应用[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2022, 41(7): 1039-1047. |
| SUN Xilong, WANG Dengfeng, RONG Baojun, et al. Applying response surface method to multi-objective optimization of automobile's side structure[J]. Mech Sci Tech Aeros Engi, 2022, 41(7): 1039-1047. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | XU Shiwei, JI Zhikang, XIAO Peijie, YUAN Quan, YUAN Qiuqi, LIU Yu, LI Junhong, LI Kewe, LI Jianyu, ZENG Zhuoran, XIAO Zhi, HE Cong, . Status and prospect of automobile lightweight technology [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(1): 16-31. |
| [2] | RONG Hai, JIANG Jianzhong, YAO Zaiqi, MA Kai, DU Kenan. Multidisciplinary design optimization of a vehicle body for lightweight based on a neural network surrogate model [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2025, 16(1): 32-42. |
| [3] | RONG Hai, JIANG Jianzhong, YAO Zaiqi, MA Kai. Parameter optimization of the sill beam section of an electric vehicle under side pole collision condition [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(6): 813-820. |
| [4] | ZHOU Jianzhong, NIE Bingbing, SUN Huiming, HUANG Jian, WANG Liangmo, GAO Qiang. Crashworthiness of auxetic structure reinforced by embedding tubes with negative Poisson’s ratio [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(3): 329-336. |
| [5] | WANG Danqi, WU Lintao, NIE Bingbing, CHE Wenchuan, ZOU Tiefang, ZHANG Junyuan. Impact damage analysis and minimum penetration energy prediction of CFRP laminated cylindrical shell for automotive applications [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(1): 29-38. |
| [6] | LUO Geng, ZHAO Jiannan, CHEN Liang, CHAI Chengpeng, WANG Tong, CHEN Yisong. Research on the crashworthiness of a novel crush box with corrugated structures [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(3): 453-462. |
| [7] | ZHANG Peng, QI Dexing, XIA Yong, LI Ying, WU Wenwang. Impact energy-absorption performances of an automobile energy-absorbing-box with plate cubic-lattice core filled [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2020, 11(3): 287-295. |
| [8] | LIU Ying, ZHU Zhenlin, WANG Dengfeng. Lightweight design of power battery compartments based on implicit full parameterization technology [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2020, 11(2): 236-242. |
| [9] | WU Yubao,NIU Weizhong,LEI Yuntao . Judgement of the worst condition of the crashworthiness in a front-to-side collision of two SUVs [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2020, 11(1): 79-85. |
| [10] | WANG Chunhong, WANG Lijian, ZUO Hengfeng, WANG Ni, Noor Intan Saffinaz Anuar, Peyman Servati, Frank Ko. Preparation, processing and properties of hemp stalk powder/ polylactic acid composites for automobiles [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2019, 10(4): 511-517. |
| [11] | LIU Zeng, WEI Xinqi, XIA Yong. Two continuum damage mechanic models for characterization of plain woven carbon fiber composites [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2019, 10(3): 293-299. |
| [12] | BAI Jie, HAO Peihan, CHEN Sihan. Traffic scene understanding using image semantic segmentation with an improved lightweight convolutional-neural-network [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2018, 9(4): 433-440. |
| [13] | YIN Jiacheng, LIU Zijian, QIN Huan, et al. Stiffness-chain mathematical model in forward concept design for an electric bus-body [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2018, 9(3): 325-332. |
| [14] | LUO Xin1 DUAN Libin, CHEN Tao, DU Zhangpeng. Design of automobile tailor rolled blank B-pillar based on one dimension hybrid cellular automata model [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2018, 9(2): 186-193. |
| [15] | LI Fangyi, WEN Zhongwu, LIU Jie, RONG Jianhua, LI Fengling. Reliability-based design optimization for lightweight design of vehicle body based on sequential Kriging model [J]. Journal Of Automotive Safety And Energy, 2017, 08(02): 205-212. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||