Impact damage analysis and minimum penetration energy prediction of CFRP laminated cylindrical shell for automotive applications

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2024.01.003

Abstract

Abstract:

The damage and energy absorption characteristics of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminated cylindrical shells under the condition of drop hammer impact were studied to explore the application prospect of CFRP in automotive curved parts. Based on the homogenization method of composite materials, a multi-scale model of CFRP laminated cylindrical shells was established to investigate the effect of radius of curvature on the impact damage and energy absorption of CFRP laminated cylindrical shells under the penetration condition. The functional relationship between the minimum penetration energy and the material parameters of the laminated cylindrical shell, structural parameters and drop hammer parameters was established with the nonlinear fitting method, so as to realize the rapid prediction of the minimum penetration energy at the conceptual design stage. Compared with the simulation results, the error of the fitting formula is less than 20%. The results show that the peak load width of laminated cylindrical shell is larger and more stable than that of flat plate. Under the impact of 60 J, the damage area of each layer of the laminated cylindrical shell is relatively uniform, and the damage area of the fiber is independent of the curvature radius, and the damage area of the matrix increases with the curvature radius. When the radius of curvature is 100 mm, the laminated shell has good bearing capacity and deformation resistance, and has good impact resistance. When the curvature radius is 200 mm, the laminated shell dissipates the most energy, and the energy absorption effect is better.

Key words: automobile lightweight, carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), laminated cylindrical shell, impact damage, impact damage

CLC Number:

TB332

WANG Danqi, WU Lintao, NIE Bingbing, CHE Wenchuan, ZOU Tiefang, ZHANG Junyuan. Impact damage analysis and minimum penetration energy prediction of CFRP laminated cylindrical shell for automotive applications[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(1): 29-38.

Figures/Tables 20

References 17

[1]	李志虎, 赛影辉, 王志超, 等. 碳纤维复合材料在汽车上的应用概述[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2023, 48(3): 136-141. doi: 10.16638/j.cnki.1671-7988.2023.03.026
	LI Zhihu, SAI Yinghui, WANG Zhichao, et al. Application overview of carbon fiber composite in automobile[J]. Autom Appl Tech, 2023, 48(3): 136-141. (in Chinese)
[2]	李光霁, 刘新玲. 汽车轻量化技术的研究现状综述[J]. 材料科学与工艺, 2020, 28(5): 47-61.
	LI Guangji, LIU Xinling. Literature review on research and development of automotive lightweight technology[J]. Mater Sci Tech, 2020, 28(5): 47-61. (in Chinese)
[3]	林刚. 构建“硬科技”优势:2021全球碳纤维复合材料市场报告[J]. 纺织科学研究, 2022(Z1): 46-66.
	LIN Gang. Building a "Hard Technology" advantage-global carbon fibre composites market report 2021[J]. Text Sci Res, 2022(Z1): 46-66. (in Chinese)
[4]	ZHOU Junjie, LIU Bin, WANG Shengnan. Finite element analysis on impact response and damage mechanism of composite laminates under single and repeated low-velocity impact[J]. Aerosp Sci Tech, 2022, 129: No 107810.
[5]	Krishnamurthy K S, Mahajan P, Mittal R K. Impact response and damage in laminated composite cylindrical shells[J]. Comp Struct, 2003, 59(1): 15-36. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00238-6 URL
[6]	Martins R, Donadon M, Almeida S. The effects of curvature and internal pressure on the compression-after-impact strength of composite laminates[J]. J Comp Mater, 2016, 50(6): 825-848. doi: 10.1177/0021998315582079 URL
[7]	Chandrashekhara K, Schroeder T. Nonlinear impact analysis of laminated cylindrical and doubly curved shells[J]. J Comp Mater, 1995, 29(16): 2160-2179. doi: 10.1177/002199839502901604 URL
[8]	Leylek Z, Scott M L, Georgiadis S, et al. Computer modelling of impact on curved fibre composite panels[J]. Comp Struct, 1999, 47(1-4): 789-796. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00055-6 URL
[9]	Choi I H. Geometrically nonlinear transient analysis of composite laminated plate and shells subjected to low-velocity impact[J]. Comp Struct, 2016, 142: 7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.070 URL
[10]	Harris W, Coutis C, Atkin C. Impact response of curved composite laminates: effect of radius and thickness[J]. Appl Comp Mater, 2020, 27: 555-573. doi: 10.1007/s10443-020-09826-2
[11]	Antoine G, Batra R. Effect of curvature on penetration resistance of polycarbonate panels[J]. J Appl Mech-T Asme, 2016, 83(12):No 121002.
[12]	Usta F, Mullaoglu F, Türkmen H. Effects of thickness and curvature on impact behaviour of composite panels[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 167: 216-222. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.690 URL
[13]	白光辉. 先进复合材料力学性能测试标准图解[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2015: 125-138.
	BAI Guanghui. Mechanical Properties Testing Standards for Advanced Composite Materials[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2015: 125-138. (in Chinese)
[14]	杨庆生. 复合材料细观结构力学与设计[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2000: 175-203.
	YANG Qingsheng. Microstructural Mechanics and Design of Composite Materials[M]. Beijing: China Railway Press, 2000: 175-203. (in Chinese)
[15]	ZHANG Junyuan, LI Zhongyu, ZHANG Qiushi, et al. Study of fiber modulus effect on impact energy absorption characteristics of composite laminates at normal and oblique impacts[J]. Mater Res Express, 2019, 6(8): No 085610.
[16]	Caprino G, Lopresto V. On the penetration energy for fibre-reinforced plastics under low-velocity impact conditions[J]. Comp Sci Tech, 2001, 61(1): 65-73. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00152-4 URL
[17]	Recht R, Ipson T. Ballistic perforation dynamics[J]. J Appl Fluid Mech, 1963, 30(3): 384-390.

密度，ρ	1.550 t/m³
弹性模量，E₁	145 GPa
弹性模量，E₂	8.1 GPa
弹性模量，E₃	8.1 GPa
泊松比，υ₂₁	0.36
剪切模量，G₁₂	4.4 GPa
纤维方向(1方向)的拉伸强度，X_T1	2.455 GPa
纤维方向(1方向)的压缩强度，X_C2	1.211 GPa
基体方向(2方向)的拉伸强度，Y_T2	35 MPa
基体方向(2方向)的压缩强度，Y_C2	186 MPa
纵向面内剪切强度，S	61 MPa

密度，ρ	1.550 t/m³
弹性模量，E₁	145 GPa
弹性模量，E₂	8.1 GPa
弹性模量，E₃	8.1 GPa
泊松比，υ₂₁	0.36
剪切模量，G₁₂	4.4 GPa
纤维方向(1方向)的拉伸强度，X_T1	2.455 GPa
纤维方向(1方向)的压缩强度，X_C2	1.211 GPa
基体方向(2方向)的拉伸强度，Y_T2	35 MPa
基体方向(2方向)的压缩强度，Y_C2	186 MPa
纵向面内剪切强度，S	61 MPa

材料	密度 g·cm^-3	杨氏模量 GPa	面内杨氏模量 GPa	泊松比	面内泊松比	横向剪切模量 GPa
纤维	1.8	210.95	27.1	0.38	0.31	100
基体	1.2	3.55	-	0.30	-	-

材料	密度 g·cm^-3	杨氏模量 GPa	面内杨氏模量 GPa	泊松比	面内泊松比	横向剪切模量 GPa
纤维	1.8	210.95	27.1	0.38	0.31	100
基体	1.2	3.55	-	0.30	-	-

R / mm	v_min / (mm·s^-1)	k	R²	U_minp/ J
100	2 330.57	1.9	0.999	26.29
200	2 518.47	1.8	0.999	30.7
300	2 722.82	2.1	0.999	35.91
400	2 662.19	1.9	0.999	34.3