Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 378-385.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2022.02.019
• Automotive Energy Efficiency and Environment Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Donghui1(
), LUO Renhong2,*(
), WANG Zhifeng3
Received:2022-01-26
Revised:2022-03-06
Online:2022-06-30
Published:2022-07-01
Contact:
LUO Renhong
E-mail:1213256624@qq.com;15171391539@qq.com
CLC Number:
ZHOU Donghui, LUO Renhong, WANG Zhifeng. Layout optimization of cooling modules in a commercial vehicle engine compartment[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(2): 378-385.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.journalase.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2022.02.019
| 正交试验序号 | 因素 | 响应目标值 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | θout / ℃ | Cd | |
| 1 | 50 | 10 | - 20 | 0 | 89.95 | 457.61 |
| 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90.35 | 460.12 |
| 3 | 50 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 90.42 | 459.60 |
| 4 | 50 | -5 | 40 | 30 | 90.75 | 455.03 |
| 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 91.65 | 456.41 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | - 20 | 30 | 90.15 | 458.36 |
| 7 | 0 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 91.35 | 457.10 |
| 8 | 0 | - 5 | 20 | 10 | 91.78 | 455.63 |
| 9 | - 50 | - 5 | 20 | 30 | 91.45 | 458.44 |
| 10 | - 50 | 0 | - 20 | 20 | 90.15 | 460.85 |
| 11 | - 50 | 5 | 40 | 10 | 90.68 | 464.37 |
| 12 | - 50 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 90.93 | 458.18 |
| 13 | - 100 | - 5 | - 20 | 10 | 89.81 | 466.49 |
| 14 | - 100 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 90.41 | 459.71 |
| 15 | - 100 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 90.11 | 453.52 |
| 16 | - 100 | 10 | 40 | 20 | 90.31 | 462.24 |
| 正交试验序号 | 因素 | 响应目标值 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | θout / ℃ | Cd | |
| 1 | 50 | 10 | - 20 | 0 | 89.95 | 457.61 |
| 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90.35 | 460.12 |
| 3 | 50 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 90.42 | 459.60 |
| 4 | 50 | -5 | 40 | 30 | 90.75 | 455.03 |
| 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 91.65 | 456.41 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | - 20 | 30 | 90.15 | 458.36 |
| 7 | 0 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 91.35 | 457.10 |
| 8 | 0 | - 5 | 20 | 10 | 91.78 | 455.63 |
| 9 | - 50 | - 5 | 20 | 30 | 91.45 | 458.44 |
| 10 | - 50 | 0 | - 20 | 20 | 90.15 | 460.85 |
| 11 | - 50 | 5 | 40 | 10 | 90.68 | 464.37 |
| 12 | - 50 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 90.93 | 458.18 |
| 13 | - 100 | - 5 | - 20 | 10 | 89.81 | 466.49 |
| 14 | - 100 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 90.41 | 459.71 |
| 15 | - 100 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 90.11 | 453.52 |
| 16 | - 100 | 10 | 40 | 20 | 90.31 | 462.24 |
| 极差分析 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 90.368 | 90.948 | 90.015 | 90.660 |
| k2 | 91.233 | 90.265 | 90.760 | 90.655 |
| k3 | 90.803 | 90.640 | 91.015 | 90.633 |
| k4 | 90.160 | 90.710 | 90.773 | 90.615 |
| R | 1.072 | 0.683 | 1.000 | 0.045 |
| 主次因素(从大到小) | D1、 D3、 D2、 D4 | |||
| 极差分析 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 90.368 | 90.948 | 90.015 | 90.660 |
| k2 | 91.233 | 90.265 | 90.760 | 90.655 |
| k3 | 90.803 | 90.640 | 91.015 | 90.633 |
| k4 | 90.160 | 90.710 | 90.773 | 90.615 |
| R | 1.072 | 0.683 | 1.000 | 0.045 |
| 主次因素(从大到小) | D1、 D3、 D2、 D4 | |||
| 极差分析 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 458.090 | 458.898 | 460.828 | 458.150 |
| k2 | 456.875 | 459.760 | 457.058 | 461.653 |
| k3 | 460.460 | 458.648 | 458.345 | 459.775 |
| k4 | 460.490 | 458.610 | 459.685 | 456.338 |
| R | 3. 615 | 1. 150 | 3. 770 | 5. 315 |
| 主次因素(从大到小) | D4、 D3、 D1、 D2 | |||
| 极差分析 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 458.090 | 458.898 | 460.828 | 458.150 |
| k2 | 456.875 | 459.760 | 457.058 | 461.653 |
| k3 | 460.460 | 458.648 | 458.345 | 459.775 |
| k4 | 460.490 | 458.610 | 459.685 | 456.338 |
| R | 3. 615 | 1. 150 | 3. 770 | 5. 315 |
| 主次因素(从大到小) | D4、 D3、 D1、 D2 | |||
| 响应目标 | 因素 | SS | DFi | σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发动机出水温度,θout | D1 | 2.73 | 3.00 | 0.909 |
| D2 | 0.96 | 3.00 | 0.320 | |
| D3 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 0.751 | |
| D4 | 0.01 | 3.00 | 0.002 | |
| e | 0.95 | 3.00 | 0.317 | |
| 整车风阻因数,Cd | D1 | 38.77 | 3.00 | 12.92 |
| D2 | 3.45 | 3.00 | 1.15 | |
| D3 | 32.04 | 3.00 | 10.68 | |
| D4 | 61.78 | 3.00 | 20.59 | |
| e | 4.91 | 3.00 | 1. 64 |
| 响应目标 | 因素 | SS | DFi | σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发动机出水温度,θout | D1 | 2.73 | 3.00 | 0.909 |
| D2 | 0.96 | 3.00 | 0.320 | |
| D3 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 0.751 | |
| D4 | 0.01 | 3.00 | 0.002 | |
| e | 0.95 | 3.00 | 0.317 | |
| 整车风阻因数,Cd | D1 | 38.77 | 3.00 | 12.92 |
| D2 | 3.45 | 3.00 | 1.15 | |
| D3 | 32.04 | 3.00 | 10.68 | |
| D4 | 61.78 | 3.00 | 20.59 | |
| e | 4.91 | 3.00 | 1. 64 |
| [1] | Ha S J, Chun U, Park J Y, et al. Enhancement of aerodynamic performance through high pressure relief in the engine room for passenger car using CFD technique[J]. Int’l J Autom Tech, 2017, 18(5): 779-784. |
| [2] | Kumar V, Sachin A. Underhood thermal simulation of a small passenger vehicle with rear engine compartment to evaluate and enhance radiator performance[R]. SAE Paper, 2010-01-0801. |
| [3] | 袁志群, 谷正气, 方遒. 基于冷却系统数值模型的发动机舱流动阻力特性研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(4): 474-478. |
| YUAN Zhiqun, GU Zhengqi, FANG Qiu, et al. Study on drag characteristics for flow field of underhand based on numerical model of cooling system[J]. Chin Mech Engi, 2011(4): 474-478. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | 罗仁宏, 郭建忠, 胡溧. 某商用车发动机舱散热性能的提升与试验研究[J]. 制造业自动化, 2015, 37(4):88-91. |
| LUO Renhong, GUO Jianzhong, HU Su. Heat dissipation improvement and test of a commercial vehicle engine compartment[J]. Manufact Autom, 2015, 37(4): 88-91. (in Chinese) | |
| [5] | 张毅, 陆国栋, 俞小莉. 商用车多风扇冷却模块匹配研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2014, 36(5): 552-555+565. |
| ZHANG Yi, LU Guodong, YU Xiaoli. Research on the matching of multi-fan cooling modules for commercial vehicles[J]. Autom Engi, 2014, 36(5): 552-555+5650. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] | 郭建忠, 罗仁宏, 王之丰. 商用车发动机舱热管理一维/三维联合仿真与试验[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(4):526-530. |
| GUO Jianzhong, LUO Renhong, WANG Zhifeng. Test and 1D/3D co-simulation of thermal management for a commercial vehicle engine compartment[J]. Chin Mech Engi, 2016, 27(4): 526-530. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] | YANG Zhigang, Bozeman J, Shen F Z. CFRM concept at vehicle idle conditions[R]. SAE Paper, 2003-01-0613. |
| [8] | Taylor D, Chu A. Wind tunnel investigation of the effects of installation parameters on truck cooling system performance[R]. SAE Paper, 760832. |
| [9] | Costae A. CFD approach on underhood thermal management of passenger cars and trucks[R]. SAE Tech Papers,2003-01-3577. |
| [10] | Chougule S S, Sahu S K. Thermal performance of automobile radiator using carbon nanotube water nanofluid experimental study[J]. J Therm Sci Engi Appl, 2014, 6(4): 041009. |
| [11] |
Nunez C M, Klitzman S, Goodman A. Lead exposure among automobile radiator repair workers and their children in New York City[J]. Am J Ind Med, 2010, 23(5): 763-777.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700230510 URL |
| [12] | 王东, 黄晓, 肖露. 风扇导流罩对汽车冷却模块流动性能的影响[J]. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 38(3): 260-266. |
| WANG Dong, HUANG Xiao, XIAO Lu. The influence of fan shroud on the flow performance of automobile cooling module[J]. J Jiangsu Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 38(3): 260-266. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] | 陈飞, 罗仁宏. 基于模型预测控制的水冷型燃料电池冷却系统研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2021(7): 8-13. |
| CHEN Fei, LUO Renhong. Research on water-cooled fuel cell cooling system based on model predictive control[J]. Autom Tech, 2021(7): 8-13. (in Chinese) | |
| [14] | Larson R C. Experimental investigation of adverse wind effects on air cooled condensers: Wind tunnel testing on a model power plant[J]. Dissertations & Theses-Gradworks, 2014, 12: 1149-1155. |
| [15] | Hörmann T, Lechner B, Puntigam W. Numerical and experimental investigation of flow and temperature fields around automotive cooling systems[R]. SAE Paper, 2005-01-2006. |
| [16] | 任露泉. 试验设计及其优化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 68-79. |
| REN Luquan. Experimental Design and Optimization[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009: 68-79. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] |
ZHOU Shengqi, ZHOU Luowei, YU Litao, et al. Monitoring chip fatigue in an IGBT module based on grey relational analysis[J]. Microelect Reliab, 2016, 56: 49-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.10.027 URL |
| [18] | Jarrett A, Kim I Y. Design optimization of electric vehicle battery cooling plates for thermal performance[J]. J Power Sources, 2011, 196(23) : 359-10368. |
| [19] | Young S C. China to give stimulus for development of electric vehicles[N]. Bloomberg News,2012-12-24. |
| [20] |
LIU Rui, CHEN Jixin, XUN Jingzhi, et al. Numerical investigation of thermal behaviors in lithium-ion battery stack discharge[J]. Appl Energ, 2014, 132(11): 288-297.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.024 URL |
| [21] |
CHEN Defen, JIANG Jiuchun, Kim G H, et al. Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cell[J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2016, 94: 846-854.
doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015 URL |
| [22] | 徐晓明. 电动汽车冷却系统热流场的协同分析与液冷关键问题研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2012. |
| XU Xiaoming. Research on the thermal flow field synergy of electric vehicle cooling system and the key problems of liquid cooling[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Univ Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | 童高鹏, 甘伟, 李志伟, 等. 外后视镜全景镜头位置对汽车气动特性的影响研究[J]. 机械强度, 2018, 40(4): 1007-1011. |
| TONG Gaopeng, GAN Wei, LI Zhiwei, et al. Ourside rear view mirror panoramic camera position on the aerodynamic characteristic of impact study[D]. J Mech Streng, 2018, 40(4): 1007-1011. (in Chinese) | |
| [24] |
HONG Jichao, WANG Zhenpo, YAO Yongtao. Fault prognosis of battery system based on accurate voltage abnormity prognosis using long short-term memory neural networks[J]. Appl Energ, 2019, 251: 113381.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113381 URL |
| No related articles found! |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||