汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 92-98.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2024.01.010
收稿日期:
2023-10-27
修回日期:
2023-12-09
出版日期:
2024-02-29
发布日期:
2024-02-29
通讯作者:
*杨亚联,教授。E-mail:yyl@cqu.edu.cn。
作者简介:
董团结(1973—),男(汉),山东,博士研究生。E-mail:ttatlux@outlook.com。
DONG Tuanjie1,2(), YANG Yalian2,*(), SHANG Ming1
Received:
2023-10-27
Revised:
2023-12-09
Online:
2024-02-29
Published:
2024-02-29
摘要:
为了解决Miller循环混动发动机在高温高负荷下爆震倾向明显增加而导致扭矩损失严重的问题,该研究通过台架试验,对进排气相位、喷油比例和喷油相位等关键控制参数进行了优化,并根据高温高负荷下发动机的工作特性,在发动机控制逻辑中引入温度修正。结果表明:进排气相位优化等措施成功抑制了爆震;优化后的发动机在1 600 r/min高温全负荷工况下扭矩提升了18.5 %;并且实现了对进排气相位、喷油参数和点火角的高温补偿,以及不同温度下控制参数的解耦,显著改善了高温高负荷下的动力性能衰减。
中图分类号:
董团结, 杨亚联, 尚明. 高温高负荷下Miller发动机扭矩提升的控制策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(1): 92-98.
DONG Tuanjie, YANG Yalian, SHANG Ming. Control strategy for torque enhancement in Miller engines under high-temperature and high-load conditions[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2024, 15(1): 92-98.
参数 | 发动机转速 / (r·min-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 400 | 1 600 | 2 000 | |
进气相位CA / (o) | 38 | 40 | 45 |
排气相位 CA/ (o) | -30 | -30 | -25 |
油喷射模式 | 2次 | 2次 | 2次 |
第1次喷油比例,γ1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
第1次喷油相位(BTDC) CA / (o) | 300 | 310 | 310 |
第2次喷油相位(BTDC) CA / (o) | 100 | 110 | 100 |
参数 | 发动机转速 / (r·min-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 400 | 1 600 | 2 000 | |
进气相位CA / (o) | 38 | 40 | 45 |
排气相位 CA/ (o) | -30 | -30 | -25 |
油喷射模式 | 2次 | 2次 | 2次 |
第1次喷油比例,γ1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
第1次喷油相位(BTDC) CA / (o) | 300 | 310 | 310 |
第2次喷油相位(BTDC) CA / (o) | 100 | 110 | 100 |
参数 | WOT,1 600 r/min | |
---|---|---|
优化前 | 优化后 | |
进气相位CA / (°) | 40 | 50 |
排气相位CA / (°) | -30 | -27 |
第1次喷油比例,γ1 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
第1次喷油相位 (BTDC) CA / (°) | 310 | 280 |
第2次喷油相位 (BTDC) CA / (°) | 110 | 110 |
进气量,Qm / (g·s-1) | 43.6 | 52.9 |
点火角(BTDC) CA / (°) | -11 | -12 |
扭矩,T / Nm | 237 | 281 |
参数 | WOT,1 600 r/min | |
---|---|---|
优化前 | 优化后 | |
进气相位CA / (°) | 40 | 50 |
排气相位CA / (°) | -30 | -27 |
第1次喷油比例,γ1 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
第1次喷油相位 (BTDC) CA / (°) | 310 | 280 |
第2次喷油相位 (BTDC) CA / (°) | 110 | 110 |
进气量,Qm / (g·s-1) | 43.6 | 52.9 |
点火角(BTDC) CA / (°) | -11 | -12 |
扭矩,T / Nm | 237 | 281 |
[1] | 帅石金, 王志, 马骁, 等. 碳中和背景下内燃机低碳和零碳技术路径及关键技术[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 417-439. |
SHUAI Shijin, WANG Zhi, MA Xiao, et al. Low carbon and zero carbon technology paths and key technologies of ICEs under the background of carbon neutrality[J]. J Autom Safe Energ, 2021, 12(4): 417-439. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 付中伟, 滕勤, 刘青林. 阿特金森/米勒循环发动机的技术与应用[J]. 小型内燃机与车辆技术, 2017, 46(5): 75-82. |
FU Zhongwei, TENG Qin, LIU Qinglin. The technology and application of Atkinson/Miller cycle engine[J]. Smal Inte Comb Engi Moto, 2017, 46(5): 75-82. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | Mayer A, Wolf D, Günther M, et al. Fully variable valve mechanism for future engine downsizing solutions combined with Miller/Atkinson cycle[J]. Autom New Powertrain, 2019, 2(6): 42-47. |
[4] | Tirkey J V. Thermodynamic investigation of performance and emission study of miller cycle-type engine with the novel eccentric drive mechanism[J]. Autom Engi Tech, 2022, 7: 137-152. |
[5] | 方志. 可变压缩比对发动机性能的影响及机构优化设计[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021. |
FANG Zhi. The influence of variable compression ratio on engine performance and the optimal design of mechanism[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2021. (in Chinese) | |
[6] |
TIE Li, YI Gao, WANG Jiasheng, et al. The Miller cycle effects on improvement of fuel economy in a highly boosted, high compression ratio, direct-injection gasoline engine: EIVC vs. LIVC[J]. Energ Conv Manag, 2014, 79: 59-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.022 URL |
[7] | HUANG Zhaoming, SHEN Kai, WANG Li, et al. Experimental study on the effects of the Miller cycle on the performance and emissions of a downsized turbocharged gasoline direct injection engine[J]. Adva Mech Engi, 2020, 12(5): 370-380. |
[8] |
PAN Xuewei, ZHAO Yinghua, LOU Diming, et al. Study of the Miller cycle on a turbocharged DI gasoline engine regarding fuel economy improvement at part load[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(6): 1-26.
doi: 10.3390/en13010001 URL |
[9] |
WEI Sheng Li, YANG F, LI Xuan, et al. Effect of Miller cycle and exhaust gas recirculation on combustion characteristics of a gasoline direct-injection engine[J]. Energ Sour, Part A: Recov, Utili, Envir Effect, 2022, 44: 5868-5882.
doi: 10.1080/15567036.2022.2089779 URL |
[10] | HUANG Zhaoming, WANG Li, WANG Tao, et al. Effects of dilution combustion and Miller cycle on the performance of gasoline engine[J]. Int’l J Autom Tech, 2022, 23: 511-519. |
[11] | Nunziato N. Design of the engine layout and auxiliary components of a highly supercharged Miller cycle range extender engine for hybrid propulsion applications[D]. Tornio: Polytechnic University of Torino, 2019. |
[12] | Chierchia S. Range extender engine with very high power density, suitable for the use in a hybrid propulsion system: Deep Miller cycle optimization with advanced CFD 1D-3D virtual validation[D]. Tornio: Polytechnic University of Torino, 2019. |
[13] | 郑斌, 李铁, 尹涛. 高负荷下应用米勒循环提升高压比汽油机热效率机理研究[J]. 车用发动机, 2015 (5): 20-25. |
ZHENG Bin, LI Tie, YIN Tao. Analysis of thermal efficiency improvement implemented with Miller cycle for high compression ratio gasoline engine at high load[J]. Vehi Engi, 2015 (5): 20-25. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 吴中浪, 陈韬, 谢辉, 等. 高压缩比米勒循环汽油机气门策略优化[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2019, 25(4): 331-339. |
WU Zhonglang, CHEN Tao, XIE Hui, et al. Optimization of valve strategy for high compression-ratio gasoline engine operating with miller cycle[J]. Combust Sci Tech, 2019, 25(4): 331-339. (in Chinese) | |
[15] |
WEI Haiqiao, SHAO Aifang, HUA Jianxiong, et al. Effects of applying a Miller cycle with split injection on engine performance and knock resistance in a downsized gasoline engine[J]. Fuel, 2018, 214: 98-107.
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.006 URL |
[16] |
WANG Yuanfeng, ZU Bingfeng, XU Yuliang, et al. Performance analysis of a Miller cycle engine by an indirect analysis method with sparking and knock in consideration[J]. Energ Conve Manag, 2016, 119: 316-326.
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.083 URL |
[17] | Demirci O K, Uyumaz A, Sarıdemir S, et al. Performance and emission characteristics of a Miller cycle engine[J]. Int’l J Autom Engi Tech, 2018, 7(3): 107-116. |
[18] | 王磊, 张双, 杜家坤, 等. 进一步提升增压直喷发动机米勒效应的试验研究[J]. 现代车用动力, 2020 (4): 30-36. |
WANG Lei, ZHANG Shuang, DU Jiakun, et al. Experimental study on improving miller effect of turbocharged direct injection engine[J]. Mode Autom Power, 2020 (4): 30-36. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 渠肖楠. 米勒循环结合EGR对直喷汽油机性能影响的研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2019. |
QU Xiaonan. Research on effects of Miller cycle combined with EGR on GDI engine performance[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2019. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | Hoepke B, Jannsen S, Emmanuel P K, et al. EGR effects on boosted SI engine operation and knock integral correlation[J]. SAE Int’l J Engi, 2012, 5: 547-559. |
[21] | 胡志远, 徐扬, 房亮, 等. 米勒循环对增压直喷汽油机性能影响的仿真分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(10): 1490-1499. |
HU Zhiyuan, XU Yang, FANG Liang, et al. Simulation analysis of miller cycle on performance of supercharged direct injection gasoline engine[J]. J Tongji Univ(Natu Sci), 2022, 50(10): 1490-1499. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 邵爱芳. 基于米勒循环的爆震抑制策略及其对汽油机性能影响研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2018. |
SHAO Aifang. Knock Suppression and Performance Improvement Strategy Based on Miller Cycle[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2018. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 黄伟. 进气与燃油喷射策略对小型化高压缩比增压直喷汽油机性能影响的研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2013. |
HUANG Wei. Research on the effects of intake and fuel injection strategies on the performance of boosted downsized, high-compression ratio SIDI engine[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2013. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | Luisi S, Doria V, Stroppia A, et al. Experimental investigation on early and late intake valve closures for knock mitigation through Miller cycle in a downsized turbocharged engine[C]// SAE Tech Paper. Warrendale, PA: SAE International, 2015. |
[25] |
WEI Haiqiao, YU Jie, ZHOU Lei. Improvement of engine performance with high compression ratio based on knock suppression using Miller cycle with boost pressure and split injection[J]. Front Energ, 2019, 13(4): 691-706.
doi: 10.1007/s11708-019-0621-3 |
[1] | 王君琦, 李勇滔, 郑伟光, 张彦会, 陈子邮, 许恩永, 李育方, 王善超. 神经网络识别和Markov链预测的商用车APU控制策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(5): 600-608. |
[2] | 史培龙, 高艺鹏, 张子豪, 赵轩, 余强. 重型载货汽车长下坡制动工况辨识[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(3): 299-309. |
[3] | 刘刊, 齐海波, 牛阿慧, 闫炳强, 秦军超. C1电动教练车动力系统设计与控制策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(3): 290-298. |
[4] | 吴浩, 丁文敏, 魏广杰, 胡均, 游道亮. 基于路况和驾驶习惯的自适应能量回收控制策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(1): 106-117. |
[5] | 杨金松, 赵德宗, 江菁晶, 蓝江林, 李亮. 异构智能网联车辆编队的双阶段节能驾驶控制策略(英文)[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(4): 676-685. |
[6] | 徐杰, 裴晓飞, 杨波, 方志刚. 融合车辆轨迹预测的学习型自动驾驶决策[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 317-324. |
[7] | 赖辉平, 侯亮, 王少杰, 刘强生. 基于6σ设计的插电混合动力客车的能量管理策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 358-367. |
[8] | 刘尚, 蔡开源, 刘伟, 王巍, 赵自庆, 张日东, 张启航, 马骁, 王志. 多燃烧模式下掺氨发动机试验研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(1): 142-148. |
[9] | 黄志超, 赵乙光, 胡义华, 柳明. 某驱动桥主减速器的振动特性分析[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(3): 298-304. |
[10] | 尹爱勇, 黄昭明, 王利, 沈凯, 陈伟国. Miller循环汽油机稀薄燃烧及排放特性分析[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(3): 402-409. |
[11] | 商恩义, 李月明, 习波波, 崔新康, 张毅. C-NCAP中THOR 50 th假人头部气囊触底评价方法探讨[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(2): 180-185. |
[12] | 祝浩, 张天强, 刘元治, 徐家良. 双电机混合动力车辆串并联驱动模式切换控制方法[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(1): 106-115. |
[13] | 牛亚卓, 聂国乐, 杨建军, 刘双喜, 白巴特尔. 基于多工况分析的插电式混合动力汽车节能控制策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(4): 546-552. |
[14] | 杨坤, 董丹秀, 王杰, 马超, 李跃伟, 刘国栋. 多能量源燃料电池电动客车参数匹配及控制策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3): 362-370. |
[15] | 刘灵芝, 张冰战, 蒋通. 基于工况自适应的 PHEV 等效燃油最小策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3): 371-378. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||