汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 282-289.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2022.02.008
收稿日期:
2021-08-20
修回日期:
2021-12-12
出版日期:
2022-06-30
发布日期:
2022-07-01
作者简介:
朱艳(1985—),女(汉),江苏,副教授。E-mail: xiaoyanzhu1985@163.com。
基金资助:
ZHU Yan(), XIE Zhongzhi, YU Wen, LI Shusheng, ZHANG Xun
Received:
2021-08-20
Revised:
2021-12-12
Online:
2022-06-30
Published:
2022-07-01
摘要:
提出了一种新型在低光照环境下有较高适应性和识别精度的疲劳驾驶检测技术。用深度视觉传感器获取驾驶员驾驶图像,用人脸跟踪算法实时提取面部特征点数据,基于最小二乘法对眼睛和嘴巴轮廓进行曲线拟合。计算眼睛和嘴巴开合度归一化指标,提取了眨眼频率、眨眼平均时长、眼睛闭合总时长、打哈欠频率、打哈欠总时长、低抬头频率等6个疲劳识别特征数据。基于数据统计序列的卷积神经网络算法,建立识别模型,构建疲劳状态检测系统。实验表明:本文算法在低光照环境下的疲劳驾驶识别精度达到了90%,识别时间约为130 ms。
中图分类号:
朱艳, 谢忠志, 于雯, 李曙生, 张逊. 低光照环境下基于面部特征点的疲劳驾驶检测技术[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 282-289.
ZHU Yan, XIE Zhongzhi, YU Wen, LI Shusheng, ZHANG Xun. Fatigue-driving detect-technology in low light environment based on facial feature points[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(2): 282-289.
疲劳 等级 | fb min-1 | tb s | tc s | fy min-1 | ty s | fh min-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不 | > 15 | < 0.3 | < 2 | < 1 | < 0.5 | < 3 |
轻度 | 10~15 | 0.3~0.5 | 2~3 | 1~2 | 0.5~2 | 3~6 |
中度 | 6~10 | 0.5~1 | 3~5 | 2~4 | 2~5 | 6~10 |
严重 | < 6 | > 1 | > 5 | > 4 | > 5 | > 10 |
疲劳 等级 | fb min-1 | tb s | tc s | fy min-1 | ty s | fh min-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不 | > 15 | < 0.3 | < 2 | < 1 | < 0.5 | < 3 |
轻度 | 10~15 | 0.3~0.5 | 2~3 | 1~2 | 0.5~2 | 3~6 |
中度 | 6~10 | 0.5~1 | 3~5 | 2~4 | 2~5 | 6~10 |
严重 | < 6 | > 1 | > 5 | > 4 | > 5 | > 10 |
年龄/ 岁 | 人数 | 样本数/ 个 | 模拟时长/ min | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | 正常驾驶 | 轻度疲劳 | 中度疲劳 | 严重疲劳 | 正常驾驶 | 轻度疲劳 | 中度疲劳 | 严重疲劳 | |||
20~30 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||
30~40 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 42 | 30 | 24 | 24 | ||
40~45 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 48 | 30 | 21 | 21 |
年龄/ 岁 | 人数 | 样本数/ 个 | 模拟时长/ min | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | 正常驾驶 | 轻度疲劳 | 中度疲劳 | 严重疲劳 | 正常驾驶 | 轻度疲劳 | 中度疲劳 | 严重疲劳 | |||
20~30 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||
30~40 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 42 | 30 | 24 | 24 | ||
40~45 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 48 | 30 | 21 | 21 |
算法模型 | 正常光照情况 | 低光照情况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
准确率/ % | 识别时间/ ms | 准确率/ % | 识别时间/ ms | ||
TVA | 66 | 69 | 62 | 78 | |
SVM | 80 | 282 | 74 | 272 | |
Ada-Boost | 87 | 242 | 85 | 253 | |
DT | 75 | 206 | 77 | 224 | |
KNN | 78 | 185 | 70 | 181 | |
CNN | 91 | 125 | 90 | 132 |
算法模型 | 正常光照情况 | 低光照情况 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
准确率/ % | 识别时间/ ms | 准确率/ % | 识别时间/ ms | ||
TVA | 66 | 69 | 62 | 78 | |
SVM | 80 | 282 | 74 | 272 | |
Ada-Boost | 87 | 242 | 85 | 253 | |
DT | 75 | 206 | 77 | 224 | |
KNN | 78 | 185 | 70 | 181 | |
CNN | 91 | 125 | 90 | 132 |
[1] | 徐军莉, 闵建亮, 胡剑锋, 等. 定性推理生成器在驾驶疲劳检测中的应用[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2018, 9(1): 32-40. |
XU Junli, MIN Jianliang, HU Jianfeng, et al. Application of qualitative reasoning generator in driving fatigue detection[J]. J Auto Safe Energy, 2018, 9(1): 32-40. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | Dias N S, Carmo J P, Mendes P M, et al. Wireless instrumentation system based on dry electrodes for acquiring EEG signals[J]. Medi Eng Phys, 2012, 34(7): 972-981. |
[3] | 李江天, 李敏, 宋战兵. 基于多源生理信号的驾驶疲劳检测[J]. 物流技术, 2018, 37(2): 78-83. |
LI Jiangtian, LI Min, SONG Zhanbing. Driving fatigue detection based on multi-source physiological signals[J]. Logistics Technology, 2018, 37 (2): 78-83. (in Chinese) | |
[4] |
Borghini G, Astolfi L, Vecchiato G, et al. Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness[J]. Neurosci Biobeha Rev, 2012, 44: 58-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.003 URL |
[5] | Friedrichs F, YANG Bin. Drowsiness monitoring by steering and lane data based features under real driving conditions[C]// Signal Proc Conf, 2010, Euro IEEE, 2010: 209-213. |
[6] | 刘军, 王利明, 聂斐, 等. 基于转向盘转角的疲劳驾驶检测方法研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2016(4): 42-45. |
LIU Jun, WANG Liming, NIE Fei, et al. Research on fatigue driving detection method based on steering wheel angle[J]. Automotive Tech, 2016(4): 42-45. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 李作进, 李仁杰, 李升波. 基于方向盘转角近似熵与复杂度的驾驶人疲劳状态识别[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2016, 7(3): 279-284. |
LI Zuojin, LI Renjie, LI Shengbo. Driver fatigue state recognition based on approximate entropy and complexity of steering wheel angle[J]J Auto Safe Energy, 2016, 7(3): 279-284. (in Chinese) | |
[8] |
LI Zuojin, CHEN Liukui, PENG Jun, et al. Automatic detection of driver fatigue using driving operation information for transportation safety[J]. Sensors, 2017, 17(6): 1-12.
doi: 10.3390/s17010001 URL |
[9] |
Sikander G, Anwar S. Driver fatigue detection systems: A review[J]. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 2019, 20(6): 2339-2352.
doi: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2868499 URL |
[10] | 樊星, 刘占文, 林杉, 等. 融合人眼特征与深度学习的疲劳驾驶检测模型[J]. 计算机工程, 2021, 47(8): 243-250. |
FAN Xing, LIU Zhanwen, LIN Shan, et al. Fatigue driving detection model integrating human eye features and deep learning[J]. Compu Engirg, 2021, 47(8): 243-250. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | Hilal A, Ali A, Waleed A. Modular design of fatigue detection in naturalistic driving environments[J]. Accid Anal Preve, 2018, 120: 188-194. |
[12] | ZHANG Fang, SU Jingjing. Driver fatigue detection based on eye state recognition[C]// 2017: 105-110. |
[13] |
KIM Whui, JUNG Woo-Sung, CHOI Hyun-Kyun. Lightweight driver monitoring system based on multi-task mobilenets[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(14): 1-18.
doi: 10.3390/s19010001 URL |
[14] | 胡习之, 黄冰瑜. 基于面部特征分析的疲劳驾驶检测方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(4): 1629-1636. |
HU Xizhi, HUANG Bingyu. Fatigue driving detection method based on facial feature analysis[J]. Sci Tech Engirg, 2021, 21(4): 1629-1636. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 方斌, 徐硕, 冯晓锋. 面向ARM平台的自标定驾驶员疲劳检测方法[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(1): 71-78. |
FANG Bin, XU Shuo, FENG Xiaofeng. Self calibration driver fatigue detection method for arm platform[J]. J Auto Safe Energy, 2020, 11(1): 71-78. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 娄平, 杨欣, 胡辑伟, 等. 基于边缘计算的疲劳驾驶检测方法[J]. 计算机工程, 2021, 47(7): 13-20+29. |
LOU Ping, YANG Xin, HU Jiwei, et al. Fatigue driving detection method based on edge calculation[J]. Comp Engineering, 2021, 47(7): 13-20+29. (in Chinese) | |
[17] |
ZHANG Kaipeng, ZHANG Zhanpeng, LI Zhifeng. Joint face detection and alignment using multitask cascaded convolutional networks[J]. IEEE Signal Proces Letters, 2016, 23(10): 1-5.
doi: 10.1109/LSP.2016.2516438 URL |
[18] | XIANG Jia, ZHU Gengming. Joint face detection and facial expression recognition with MTCNN[C]// 2017 4th Int’l Conf Info Sci Control Engi, Changsha, China, 2017: 424-427. |
[19] | LIU Weiwei, SUN Haixin, Shen Weijie. Driver fatigue detection through pupil detection and yawing analysis[C]// 2010 Int’l Conf’Bioinfo Biomed Tech, New York, 2010: 404-407. |
[20] | HU Siquan, LIN Zhenye. Fatigue driving detection based on machine learning and image processing technology[C]// 3rd Ann Int’l Conf Info Syst Arti Intel (ISAI), Beijing, China, 2018: 1-6. |
[21] | Reddy B, KIMYehoon, YUNSojung. Real-time driver drowsiness detection for embedded system using model compression of deep neural networks[C]// The 2017 IEEE Conf Computer Vision Pattern Recog (CVPR), Honolulu, USA, 2017: 438-445. |
[22] | 朱艳, 李曙生, 谢忠志. 基于FCM聚类和卷积神经网络的跌倒识别算法[J]. 数据采集与处理, 2021, 36(04): 746-755. |
ZHU Yan, LI Shusheng, XIE Zhongzhi. Fall recognition algorithm based on FCM clustering and convolutional neural network[J]. Data Acquisition & Processing, 2021, 36 (4): 746-755. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | Ngxande M, Tapamo J R. Driver drowsiness detection using behavioral measures and machine learning techniques: A review of state-of-art techniques[C]// Pattern Recog Asso South Africa Robo Mechatronics (PRASA- RobMech), Bloemfontein, South Africa, 2017: 156-161. |
[24] | Akalya C, Mandi S R, Reddy E, et al. Fatigue detection using raspberry Pi 3[J]. Int’l J Engin Tech, 2018, 7(2): 29-32. |
[25] | Celona L, Mammana L. A multi-task CNN framework for driver face monitoring[C]// 2018 IEEE 8th Int’l Conf Consumer Electr, Berlin, 2018: 612-616. |
[1] | 雍加望, 李岩松, 冯能莲, 刘亚辉. 基于ESHB系统的自适应自动紧急制动控制策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 300-308. |
[2] | 胡远志, 蒋涛, 刘西, 施友宁. 基于双流自适应图卷积神经网络的行人过街意图识别[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 325-332. |
[3] | 李海岩, 李广明, 贺丽娟, 冉令华, 吕文乐, 崔世海, 阮世捷. 汽车追尾碰撞中颈部姿态对生物力学响应的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(1): 55-62. |
[4] | 龙永程, 郝海舟, 李凡, 费敬. 行人安全测试现行腿型冲击器的生物逼真度[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 475-482. |
[5] | 徐洪震, 王方, 胡林, 王振, 李凡. 基于事故重建的行人与骑车人头部损伤的差异性[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 483-489. |
[6] | 孙振东, 朱海涛, 彭伟强. AEB制动对THOR 50th假人乘坐姿态影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 499-506. |
[7] | 王宝琳, 夏怀成, 董倩倩. 车辆转弯工况下间接式胎压监测系统脉冲数的修正[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 507-515. |
[8] | 边疆, 王晓颖, 桂良进, 范子杰. 双金属鼓式制动器高温工况的试验与仿真[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(2): 173-179. |
[9] | 李学鋆, 章菊. 考虑路面附着系数和车速的 AFS 可变传动比设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3): 329-336. |
[10] | 吴玉宝,牛卫中,雷云涛. 两辆 SUV 乘用车侧碰耐撞性最差工况的判定[J]. JASE, 2020, 11(1): 79-85. |
[11] | 申恩恩,胡玉梅,陈光,罗攀,朱浩. 智能驾驶实时目标检测的深度卷积神经网络[J]. JASE, 2020, 11(1): 111-116. |
[12] | 胡远志,刘俊生,何佳,肖航,宋佳. 基于激光雷达点云与图像融合的车辆目标检测方法[J]. JASE, 2019, 10(4): 451-458. |
[13] | 黄 杰, 刘 西, 胡远志, 等. 充气式安全带对后排女性乘员的保护效果[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2019, 10(1): 74-81. |
[14] | 林云成,宋家锋,刘升福,等. 基于竹节结构的保险杠横梁仿生优化及仿真分析[J]. JASE, 2018, 9(4): 410-417. |
[15] | 白 傑,郝培涵,陈思汉. 用轻量化卷积神经网络图像语义分割的交通场景理解[J]. JASE, 2018, 9(4): 433-440. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||