汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1): 95-103.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2022.01.009
邹铁方1,2(
), 吴良伟1,2, 胡林*1,2(
), 聂冰冰3, 王方1,2
收稿日期:2021-07-22
修回日期:2021-10-11
出版日期:2022-03-31
发布日期:2022-04-02
通讯作者:
胡林
作者简介:*胡林,教授。E-mail: hulin@csust.edu.cn。基金资助:
ZOU Tiefang1,2(
), WU Liangwei1,2, HU Lin*1,2(
), NIE Bingbing3, WANG Fang1,2
Received:2021-07-22
Revised:2021-10-11
Online:2022-03-31
Published:2022-04-02
Contact:
HU Lin
摘要:
以46组物理试验和98组数字模拟试验,以自行车车型、座高、骑车人体型及汽车车型为变量,研究了自行车座高对骑车人脊背前倾角(背角)和头部损伤的影响。物理试验发现:影响背角的显著因素有自行车车型、座高及骑车人体型。数字模拟试验发现:座高与骑车人头部损伤显著相关,不同汽车车型、自行车车型与骑车人体型组合下的头部损伤随座高变化规律不同,存在头部损伤耐受座高。头部损伤降低的内因是头部与汽车相对碰撞速度的降低。该研究结果可为汽车与自行车仿真试验提供支持,为骑车人头部防护措施提供建议。
中图分类号:
邹铁方, 吴良伟, 胡林, 聂冰冰, 王方. 自行车座高对骑车人脊背前倾角和头部损伤的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(1): 95-103.
ZOU Tiefang, WU Liangwei, HU Lin, NIE Bingbing, WANG Fang. Influence of bicycle seat height on the back lean forward angle and head injury of cyclists[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(1): 95-103.
| 来源 | 车型 | 把手高/ cm | 座高/ cm | 车长/ cm | 轮径/ cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 试验车 | 代步车 | 100 | 78~93 | 159 | 47 |
| 山地车 | 98 | 85~102 | 172 | 66 | |
| 公路车 | 90 | 86~103 | 169 | 66 | |
| 典型车 | 代步车 | 100 | 80~93 | 162 | 50 |
| 山地车 | 97 | 86~96 | 170 | 66 | |
| 公路车 | 90 | 85~99 | 169 | 66 |
| 来源 | 车型 | 把手高/ cm | 座高/ cm | 车长/ cm | 轮径/ cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 试验车 | 代步车 | 100 | 78~93 | 159 | 47 |
| 山地车 | 98 | 85~102 | 172 | 66 | |
| 公路车 | 90 | 86~103 | 169 | 66 | |
| 典型车 | 代步车 | 100 | 80~93 | 162 | 50 |
| 山地车 | 97 | 86~96 | 170 | 66 | |
| 公路车 | 90 | 85~99 | 169 | 66 |
| 参数 | 代号 | 数值/m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 轿车 | SUV | ||
| 挡风玻璃上边缘高度 | H1 | 1.430 | 1.600 |
| 挡风玻璃下边缘高度 | H2 | 1.050 | 1.170 |
| 底盘高度 | H3 | 0.252 | 0.310 |
| 保险杠高度 | H4 | 0.572 | 0.780 |
| 引擎盖边缘高度 | H5 | 0.750 | 0.940 |
| 挡风玻璃长度 | D1 | 0.710 | 0.730 |
| 引擎盖长度 | D2 | 1.110 | 1.250 |
| 保险杠伸出距离 | D3 | 0.080 | 0.050 |
| 参数 | 代号 | 数值/m | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 轿车 | SUV | ||
| 挡风玻璃上边缘高度 | H1 | 1.430 | 1.600 |
| 挡风玻璃下边缘高度 | H2 | 1.050 | 1.170 |
| 底盘高度 | H3 | 0.252 | 0.310 |
| 保险杠高度 | H4 | 0.572 | 0.780 |
| 引擎盖边缘高度 | H5 | 0.750 | 0.940 |
| 挡风玻璃长度 | D1 | 0.710 | 0.730 |
| 引擎盖长度 | D2 | 1.110 | 1.250 |
| 保险杠伸出距离 | D3 | 0.080 | 0.050 |
| 座高 / cm | 座把比 | β / (°) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 小身材 | 中身材 | 大身材 | |||
| 代步车 | 77 | 0.77 | 14.5 | 10.3 | 18.2 |
| 80 | 0.80 | 18.8 | 14.6 | 21.6 | |
| 83 | 0.83 | 22.1 | 18.8 | 24.9 | |
| 86 | 0.86 | 24.3 | 22.8 | 28.1 | |
| 89 | 0.89 | 25.5 | 26.7 | 31.2 | |
| 92 | 0.92 | 25.7 | 30.4 | 34.2 | |
| 95 | 0.95 | 24.8 | 34.0 | 37.1 | |
| 山地车 | 85 | 0.87 | - | 23.8 | 28.8 |
| 88 | 0.90 | - | 27.7 | 32.0 | |
| 91 | 0.93 | - | 31.4 | 35.0 | |
| 94 | 0.96 | - | 35.0 | 37.9 | |
| 97 | 0.99 | - | 38.4 | 40.8 | |
| 100 | 1.02 | - | 41.7 | 43.5 | |
| 103 | 1.05 | - | 44.8 | 46.1 | |
| 公路车 | 85 | 0.94 | - | 33.3 | 36.5 |
| 88 | 0.98 | - | 37.1 | 39.7 | |
| 91 | 1.01 | - | 40.7 | 42.7 | |
| 94 | 1.04 | - | 44.2 | 45.5 | |
| 97 | 1.08 | - | 47.4 | 48.3 | |
| 100 | 1.11 | - | 50.5 | 50.9 | |
| 103 | 1.14 | - | 53.4 | 53.4 | |
| 座高 / cm | 座把比 | β / (°) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 小身材 | 中身材 | 大身材 | |||
| 代步车 | 77 | 0.77 | 14.5 | 10.3 | 18.2 |
| 80 | 0.80 | 18.8 | 14.6 | 21.6 | |
| 83 | 0.83 | 22.1 | 18.8 | 24.9 | |
| 86 | 0.86 | 24.3 | 22.8 | 28.1 | |
| 89 | 0.89 | 25.5 | 26.7 | 31.2 | |
| 92 | 0.92 | 25.7 | 30.4 | 34.2 | |
| 95 | 0.95 | 24.8 | 34.0 | 37.1 | |
| 山地车 | 85 | 0.87 | - | 23.8 | 28.8 |
| 88 | 0.90 | - | 27.7 | 32.0 | |
| 91 | 0.93 | - | 31.4 | 35.0 | |
| 94 | 0.96 | - | 35.0 | 37.9 | |
| 97 | 0.99 | - | 38.4 | 40.8 | |
| 100 | 1.02 | - | 41.7 | 43.5 | |
| 103 | 1.05 | - | 44.8 | 46.1 | |
| 公路车 | 85 | 0.94 | - | 33.3 | 36.5 |
| 88 | 0.98 | - | 37.1 | 39.7 | |
| 91 | 1.01 | - | 40.7 | 42.7 | |
| 94 | 1.04 | - | 44.2 | 45.5 | |
| 97 | 1.08 | - | 47.4 | 48.3 | |
| 100 | 1.11 | - | 50.5 | 50.9 | |
| 103 | 1.14 | - | 53.4 | 53.4 | |
| [1] | YAN Xinping, MA Ming, HUANG Helai , et al. Motor vehicle-bicycle crashes in Beijing: irregular maneuvers, crash patterns and injury severity[J]. Accid Anal Prevention, 2011,43(5):1751-1758. |
| [2] | 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 年度数据:交通事故[EB/OL].( 2021-01-08). https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0S0D01&sj= 2020. |
| National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. Annual data: Traffic accident [EB/OL].( 2021-01-08). https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0S0D01&sj= 2020. (in Chinese) | |
| [3] | SUI Bo, Lubbe N, Bargman J . A clustering approach to developing car-to-two-wheeler test scenarios for the assessment of automated emergency braking in China using in-depth Chinese crash data[J]. Accid Anal Prevention, 2019,132. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.018. |
| [4] | ZHAO Yuqing, ITO D, MIZUNO K . AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2019,20(1):100-106. |
| [5] | Anders K, Helena S, Anders Y , et al. The potential of vehicle and road infrastructure interventions in fatal bicyclist accidents on Swedish roads-what can in-depth studies tell us?[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2019,20(sup1):7-12. |
| [6] | . Leo C, Klug C, Ohlin M , et al. Analysis of Swedish and Dutch accident data on cyclist injuries in cyclist-car collisions[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2019,20(sup2):160-162. |
| [7] | Piras M, Russo M C, Ferrari F D , et al. Cyclists fatalities: forensic remarks regarding 335 cases[J]. J Forensic Legal Medicine, 2016,44:169-173. |
| [8] | 邹铁方, 易亮, 肖璟 , 等. 基于事故再现的骑车人与行人各部位损伤的对比研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2018,40(3):271-276. |
| ZOU Tiefang, YI Liang, XIAO Jing , et al. A comparative study on the injuries in different parts of rider and pedestrian based on accident reconstruction[J]. Automotive Engi, 2018,40(3):271-276. (in Chinese) | |
| [9] | 聂进, 李桂兵, 杨济匡 . 车辆-行人/自行车骑车人事故死亡风险和头部动力学响应对比研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,41(2):64-72. |
| NIE Jing, LI Guibing, YANG Jikuang . A comparative study of head dynamic response and fatality risk of pedestrian and bicyclist in vehicle collision[J]. J Hunan Univ (Nat Sci), 2014,41(2):64-72. (in Chinese) | |
| [10] | 王兴华, 彭勇 . 汽车-自行车/摩托车碰撞事故中骑车人头腿部动力学响应对比研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018,37(1):156-162. |
| WANG Xinghua, PENG Yong . Comparative investigation on the head and leg dynamic responses of two-wheeler riders in vehicle-bicycle / motorcycle accidents[J]. J Vibr Shock, 2018,37(1):156-162. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | Moore D N, Schneider W H, Savolainen P T , et al. Mixed logit analysis of bicyclist injury severity resulting from motor vehicle crashes at intersection and non-intersection locations[J]. Accid Anal Prevention, 2011,43(3):621-630. |
| [12] | Oikawa S, Matsui Y, Nakadate H , et al. Factors in fatal injuries to cyclists impacted by five types of vehicles[J]. Int’l J Automotive Tech, 2019,20(1):197-205. |
| [13] | Fanta O, Boucek J, Hadraba D , et al. Influence of the front part of the vehicle and cyclist’s sitting position on the severity of head injury in side collision[J]. Acta Bioengi Biomech, 2013,15(1):105-112. |
| [14] | HUANG Yuan, ZHOU Qing, Caroline K , et al. Are riders of electric two-wheelers safer than bicyclists in collisions with motor vehicles?[J]. Accid Anal Prevention, 2020,134. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105336. |
| [15] | 周华, 唐梅, 刘峰 , 等. 骑车人躯干姿态对头部损伤影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020,30(1):174-179. |
| ZHOU Hua, TANG Mei, LIU Feng , et al. Impact of cyclist’s torso posture on head injury[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30(1):174-179. (in Chinese) | |
| [16] | 胡林, 程启寅, 黄晶 , 等. 轿车-自行车事故中骑车人头部损伤的影响因素研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2018,40(11):1294-1301. |
| HU Lin, CHENG Qiyin, HUANG Jing , et al. A study on the influencing factors of cyclist’s head injury in car-bicycle accidents[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2018,40(11):1294-1301. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] | 胡林, 程启寅, 黄晶 , 等. 自行车座椅高度对事故中骑车人动力学响应的影响[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018,54(21):81-89. |
| HU Lin, CHENG Qiyin, HUANG Jing , et al. Research on the effect of seat height on cyclists’ dynamics response in vehicle-bicycle accident[J]. J Mech Eng, 2018,54(21):81-89. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] | 国家技术监督局, 中国标准化与信息分类编码研究所. GB/T 10000-1988. 中国成年人人体尺寸[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1988. |
| National Bureau of Technical Supervision, China Institute of Standardization and Information Classification and Coding. GB/T 10000-1988. Chinese adult human body size[S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 1988. ( in Chinese) | |
| [19] | 薛强 . 国人共享单车使用情况调查[J]. 金融博览:财富, 2017(1):24-26. |
| XUE Qiang . Survey on the use of shared bicycles among Chinese[J]. Fina Expo:Fortune, 2017(1):24-26. (in Chinese) | |
| [20] | Otte D, Facius T . Analysis of the riding posture of bicyclists and influence parameters on the helmet use[J]. Open J Safety Sci Tech, 2017,7(1):58-68. |
| [21] | 邹铁方, 王冠, 胡林 , 等. 汽车-摩托车碰撞事故中骑乘人员损伤差异对比研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(5): 621-627+643. |
| ZOU Tiefang, WANG Guan, HU Lin, et al. Comparative study on the injury difference between motorcyclist and occupant in vehicle-motorcycle collision accidents[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 621-627+643. (in Chinese) | |
| [22] | 聂进, 吴京梅, 吴玲涛 , 等. 基于行人和自行车交通安全的城市道路限速值研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014,27(7):91-97. |
| NIE Jing, WU Jingmei, WU Lingtao , et al. Study on urban speed limit for pedestrian and bicycle traffic safety[J]. Chin J Highway and Transp, 2014,27(7):91-97. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | LI Guibing, Lyons M, WANG Bingyu , et al. The influence of passenger car front shape on pedestrian injury risk observed from German in-depth accident data[J]. Accid Anal Prevention, 2017,101:11-21. |
| [24] | 孙晓铃 . 汽车-自行车交通事故分析与仿真研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2015. |
| SUN Xiaoling . A study on automotive-bicycle traffic accident analysis and simulation[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese) |
| [1] | 梁雨琛, 段伟建, 张诗, 朱兴林, 徐进. 不同类型互通立交匝道上驾驶人心理负荷的差异[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(6): 851-858. |
| [2] | 吕远朋, 王方, 龙春光, 王丹琦, 邹铁方, 刘煜. 电动汽车侧面柱撞前排双乘员中远端乘员头颈部损伤研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(2): 207-216. |
| [3] | 吴庆富, 袁满荣, 郝帅杰, 刘嘉伟, 牛世峰, 刘金峰. 紧急状况下驾驶人应激反应的特性指标[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(1): 43-49. |
| [4] | 韩勇, 徐国超, 李明旺, 潘迪, 张海洋. 非法规侧面碰撞工况下近远端乘员损伤风险[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(1): 57-65. |
| [5] | 李昕光, 孙崇效, 曲大义, 于文昌, 胡含. 考虑交叉口启停波的智能网联车混行生态驾驶策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(6): 895-904. |
| [6] | 姚荣涵, 徐文韬, 林子敬, 王立冰. 公交-合乘车道优化设计的多目标双层规划模型[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(5): 711-722. |
| [7] | 韩勇, 罗金镕, 何勇, 吴贺, 林旭洁, 蔡鸿瑜. 基于CART决策树的车辆与行人碰撞中头部损伤风险预测[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(5): 536-543. |
| [8] | 刘天泉, 王丙雨, 吴贺, 邹俊, 毛明祥. 保险杠刚度特性对行人头部及下肢的损伤影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(1): 17-22. |
| [9] | 徐哲, 高冠宇, 刘灿灿, 娄磊. 面向儿童约束系统的多点侵入侧碰方法及假人损伤[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(1): 38-45. |
| [10] | 徐洪震, 王方, 胡林, 王振, 李凡. 基于事故重建的行人与骑车人头部损伤的差异性[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 483-489. |
| [11] | 韩勇, 李永强, 许永虹, 王丙雨, 高秀晶, 黄红武, 聂冰冰. 基于VRUs深度事故重建的AEB效能对头部损伤风险的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 490-498. |
| [12] | 张锐, 姚恩建, 张永生. 电动汽车混入条件下多方式动态交通分配模型[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 540-550. |
| [13] | 李欢, 白中浩, 高文睿, 周启峰, 蒋彬辉. 基于决策树模型的电动自行车与SUV碰撞中骑车人头部响应[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(1): 43-51. |
| [14] | 王亚军, 陈超卓, 吴沈荣. FMVSS201规程在车辆内饰件与乘员头部碰撞中的应用[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2010, 1(2): 127-131. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||