基于神经网络的火焰筒开孔直径对燃烧室燃烧性能影响的研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2026.01.009

汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 88-95.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2026.01.009

基于神经网络的火焰筒开孔直径对燃烧室燃烧性能影响的研究

付雪青¹(), 陈闯¹^,², 周道卿¹, 张岩¹^,^*(), 曹晓琳¹, 李欣¹, 吉建波¹, 陈鹏¹, 薛兴旭¹, 李耀宗¹

1.中国北方发动机研究所车用动力系统全国重点实验室，天津 300400，中国
2.天津大学机械工程学院，天津 300354，中国

收稿日期:2025-10-03 修回日期:2025-11-28 出版日期:2026-02-28 发布日期:2026-03-19
通讯作者: *张岩，研究员。E-mail：tjuzhangyan@163.com。
作者简介:付雪青（1986—），男(汉)，天津，副研究员。E-mail：fuxueqing536@163.com。
基金资助:
天津市科技计划项目(24ZXZSS00180);先进内燃动力全国重点实验室开放基金课题(K2023-07)

Research on effects of flame tube hole diameters on combustor combustion performance based on neural network

FU Xueqing¹(), CHEN Chuang¹^,², ZHOU Daoqing¹, ZHANG Yan¹^,^*(), CAO Xiaolin¹, LI Xin¹, JI Jianbo¹, CHEN Peng¹, XUE Xingxu¹, LI Yaozong¹

1. National Key Laboratory of Vehicle Power System, China North Engine Research Institute, Tianjin 300400, China
2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, China

Received:2025-10-03 Revised:2025-11-28 Online:2026-02-28 Published:2026-03-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

微型涡轮发动机的燃烧室燃烧性能受火焰筒开孔直径影响，缺乏对多种火焰筒开孔直径综合影响的分析方法，难以明确可实现高燃烧效率和低出口温度分布系数（OTDF）的火焰筒主燃孔、中间孔和掺混孔直径分布范围。针对该问题，采用神经网络对已验证燃烧室模型的计算结果进行学习，建立燃烧性能预测模型，综合分析多种开孔直径对燃烧性能的影响。结果表明：掺混孔、主燃孔和中间孔直径对燃烧效率的影响依次减弱，掺混孔直径对OTDF影响程度明显高于主燃孔和掺混孔直径。在掺混孔直径小时，不同主燃孔和中间孔直径下燃烧效率低且OTDF高；随掺混孔直径增大，中间区内高温燃气区域增加，燃烧效率提高；与此同时，掺混孔射流空气深度增加，掺混区内高温燃气与空气掺混增强，OTDF减少。

关键词: 燃烧室, 火焰筒开孔直径, 神经网络, 燃烧效率, 出口温度分布系数（OTDF）

Abstract:

The combustion performance of combustors in micro turbine engine is affected by flame tube hole diameters, lacking analytical methods for evaluating the combined effects of multiple flame tube hole diameters. It is difficult to clearly determine the diameter distribution ranges of primary hole, middle hole, and dilution hole of flame tube that can achieve high combustion efficiency and low overall temperature distribution factor (OTDF). To address this issue, a combustion performance prediction model was established by learning from the results obtained from the calibrated model of a combustor with the help of neural work. It has been utilized to study the combined effects of multiple hole diameters on combustion performance. The results show that the influence of dilution hole, primary hole and middle hole diameters on combustion efficiency gradually decreases, and the influence of dilution hole diameter on the overall temperature distribution factor (OTDF) is significantly higher than that of primary hole and middle hole diameters. Combustion efficiency is low and OTDF is high at different primary hole and middle hole diameters in case of small dilution hole diameter. With the increase of dilution hole diameter, high temperature combustion zone enlarges obviously in middle zone, which is benefit to increase combustion efficiency. In the meantime, the jet depth of the air flowing from dilution holes increases, which strengthens the mixing of air with high temperature gas and reduces OTDF.

Key words: combustor, flame tube hole diameters, neural network, combustion efficiency, overall temperature distribution factor (OTDF)

中图分类号:

TK473.2

付雪青, 陈闯, 周道卿, 张岩, 曹晓琳, 李欣, 吉建波, 陈鹏, 薛兴旭, 李耀宗. 基于神经网络的火焰筒开孔直径对燃烧室燃烧性能影响的研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2026, 17(1): 88-95.

FU Xueqing, CHEN Chuang, ZHOU Daoqing, ZHANG Yan, CAO Xiaolin, LI Xin, JI Jianbo, CHEN Peng, XUE Xingxu, LI Yaozong. Research on effects of flame tube hole diameters on combustor combustion performance based on neural network[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2026, 17(1): 88-95.

图/表 12

图1 燃烧室几何模型及其区域划分

图2 不同燃烧室网格数下沿燃烧室中心轴向速度对比

工况	测量值		油气比	测量值		计算值
工况	喷油流量 (g·s^-1)	空气流量 (kg·s^-1)	油气比	压力 kPa	温度 K	压力 kPa	温度 K
1	4.21	0.29	0.014 5	132.1	953.2	130.9	922.9
2	5.63	0.41	0.013 7	168.9	1 010.5	167.2	995.6
3	6.63	0.54	0.012 3	240.1	979.3	238.6	962.7

表1 燃烧室出口压力和温度的测量值与计算值对比

图3 不同开孔直径下ηc和OTDF等高线图

图4 燃烧室燃烧效率和OTDF对开孔直径的敏感性分析

组合	d_p /mm	d_m /mm	d_d /mm	η_c	OTDF
A	16.8	10.8	16.0	0.92	0.41
B	16.8	10.5	20.0	0.96	0.32
C	16.5	11.0	24.0	0.98	0.24

表2 3种开孔直径组合下燃烧性能参数

图5 3种开孔直径组合下燃烧室内轴向速度分布

图6 3种开孔直径组合下燃烧室轴向截面平均混合分数分布

图7 3种开孔直径组合下燃烧室轴向截面温度分布

图8 3种开孔直径组合下垂直于燃烧室轴线的截面温度分布

图9 垂直于火焰筒轴线的截面内高于1 400 K温度的网格占比

图10 图8中3种组合下截面12内不同温度范围网格占比

参考文献 16

[1]	张扬军, 钱煜平, 诸葛伟林, 等. 飞行汽车的研究与关键技术[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(1): 1-16.
	ZHANG Yangjun, QIAN Yuping, ZHUGE Weilin, et al. Progress and key technologies of flying cars[J]. *J Autom Safe Energ*, 2020, 11(1): 1-16. (in Chinese)
[2]	朱炳杰, 杨希祥, 宗件安, 等. 分布式混合电推进飞行器技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 025556.
	ZHU Bingjie, YANG Xixiang, ZONG Jianan, et al. Review of distributed hybrid electric propulsion aircraft technology[J]. *Acta Aeron Sin*, 2022, 43(7): 025556. (in Chinese)
[3]	LI Jingqi, LI Yulong. Micro gas turbine: Developments, applications, and technologies on components[J]. *Prop Powe Res*, 2023, 12(1): 1-43.
[4]	袁春, 陈彬兵, 陈兆海, 等. 微型燃气轮机发电技术[M]. 北京: 中国机械工业出版社, 2012: 39-50.
	YUAN Chun, CHEN Binbing, CHEN Zhaohai, et al. Micro Gas Turbine Power Generation Technology[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2012: 39-50. (in Chinese)
[5]	Rodgers C. Low cost microturbines via the turbo-charger route[C]// Proc ASME Turbo Expo 2011, British Columbia, Canada. 2011.
[6]	Lefebvre A H, Ballal D R. Gas Turbine Combustion Alter-ative Fuels and Emissions[M]. New York: CRC Press, 2010: 15-17.
[7]	Gogineni S, Shouse D, Frayne C, et al. Combustion air jet influence on primary zone characteristics for gas-turbine combustors[J]. *J Propul Power*, 2015, 18(2): 407-416. doi: 10.2514/2.5949 URL
[8]	Elkady A M, Jeng S M, Mongia H, et al. The influence of primary air jets on flow and pollutant emission characteristics within a model gas turbine combustor[C]// 44th AIAA Aeros Sci Meet Exhib, 2006, Reno, Nevada.
[9]	Povey T, Chana K S, Jones T V, et al. The effect of hot-streaks on HP vane surface and end wall heat transfer: An experimental and numerical study[J]. *J Turbomach, 2007, 129*(1): 32-43. doi: 10.1115/1.2370748 URL
[10]	陈闯, 沈世成, 付雪青, 等. 主燃孔参数对双级轴向旋流燃烧室流动与燃烧特性的影响[J]. 内燃机工程, 2025, 46(3): 39-47.
	CHEN Chuang, SHEN Shicheng, FU Xueqing, et al. Effects of primary inlet hole parameters on the flow and combustion characteristics of a two-stage axial swirl combustor[J]. *Chin Inte Comb Enge Engi*, 2025, 46(3): 39-47. (in Chinese)
[11]	郑顺, 王成军. 掺混孔位置对中心分级燃烧室性能影响的数值模拟[J]. 邵阳学院学报(自然科学版), 2021, 18(1): 51-59.
	ZHEN Shun, WANG Chengjun. Numerica simulation of effect of mixing hole location on performance of a central staged combustor[J]. *J Shaoyang Univ (Nat Sci Edit)*, 2021, 18(1): 51-59. (in Chinese)
[12]	林宏军, 程明. 喷嘴匹配方案及火焰筒开孔对燃烧室性能影响的试验研究[J]. 航空发动机, 2012, 38(5): 13-17.
	LIN Hongjun, CHEN Ming. Effect of nozzle matching and flame tube holes on combustion performance[J]. *Aeroengine*, 2012, 38(5): 13-17. (in Chinese)
[13]	Fayyad U, Uthurusamy R. Evolving data mining into solutions for insights[J]. *Commun ACM*, 2002, 45(8): 28-31.
[14]	陶焰明, 冯剑寒, 江立军, 等. 基于神经网络的双轴向旋流器结构参数影响分析[J]. 推进技术, 2024, 45(10): 2306031.
	TAO Yanming, FENG Jianhan, JIANG Lijun, et al. Effects of structural parameters and dual axial swirlers based on neural network[J]. *J Propul Tech*, 2024, 45(10): 2306031. (in Chinese)
[15]	赵刚, 朱华昕, 李苏辉, 等. 基于数据和神经网络的燃气轮机NO_x排放预测与优化[J]. 动力工程学报, 2021, 41(1): 22-27. doi: 10.19805/j.cnkij.cspe.2021.01.004
	ZHAO Gang, ZHU Huaxin, LI Suhui, et al. NO_x emission prediction and optimization for gas turbines based on data and neural network[J]. *J Chin Soc Power Engi*, 2021, 41(1): 22-27. (in Chinese)
[16]	尹林子, 李乐, 蒋朝辉. 基于粗糙集理论与神经网络的铁水硅含量预测[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2019, 31(8): 689-698. doi: 10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0963.20190010
	YIN Linzi, LI Le, JIANG Chaohui. Prediction of silicon content in hot metal using neural network and rough set theory[J]. *J Iron Steel Res*, 2019, 31(8): 689-698. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0963.20190010

基于神经网络的火焰筒开孔直径对燃烧室燃烧性能影响的研究

Research on effects of flame tube hole diameters on combustor combustion performance based on neural network

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 16

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

期刊信息

在线期刊

作者中心

审稿中心

联系我们

[1]	韩东明, 程思哲, 王金湘, 刘亚辉, 殷国栋. 混合交通下智能网联车辆预见性协同自适应巡航控制[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2026, 17(1): 130-139.
[2]	邱照玉, 祝小元, 田光宇, 殷国栋. 隐蔽网络攻击下智能网联汽车容错安全控制[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(6): 914-922.
[3]	程泽阳, 段奕阳, 杨蒙蒙, 冯忠祥, 王鹤, 朱晓俊, 保丽霞. 基于混合神经网络的交织区危险驾驶与风格的识别[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(5): 688-697.
[4]	王琳, 陈清华, 业红玲, 王鹏飞, 徐驰, 钱爱文. 基于神经网络自适应MPC智能车辆轨迹跟踪仿真[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(4): 638-647.
[5]	房熙博, 宁一高, 赵轩, 周猛. 基于SQP和GRNN的商用客车动力学参数自适应辨识[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(4): 648-656.
[6]	虞安军, 励英迪, 杨哲懿, 付崇宇, 童蔚苹, 余佳, 刘云海, 刘志远. 基于多维注意力机制的高速公路交通流量预测方法[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(3): 463-469.
[7]	荣海, 蒋建中, 姚再起, 马凯, 杜柯南. 基于神经网络代理模型的车身多学科轻量化优化设计[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(1): 32-42.
[8]	张立成, 押境田, 彭琨, 杨冉. 车辆急动度对神经网络油耗预测性能影响研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2025, 16(1): 117-126.
[9]	高凯, 刘健, 刘林鸿, 刘欣宇, 张金来, 杜荣华. 基于LSTM-多头混合注意力的可解释换道意图预测[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(5): 763-773.
[10]	张晨, 刘畅, 赵津, 王广玮, 许庆. 基于多尺度注意力机制的实时激光雷达点云语义的分割[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(4): 591-601.
[11]	王居闯, 曹清林, 邱睿, 宋刘伟, 郭平安, 赵港. 在侧面碰撞中电动汽车电池模块破损的预测[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2024, 15(2): 169-177.
[12]	蔡开源, 王志, 刘奕, 陈清楚, 齐运亮, 林浩, 卢文健, 张沈欢, 殷勇. 氨柴双燃料高压缩比发动机柴油喷射策略优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(6): 783-789.
[13]	朱波, 张纪伟, 谈东奎, 胡旭东. 基于多源传感器与导航地图的端到端自动驾驶方法[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(4): 738-749.
[14]	魏孟, 王桥, 叶敏, 廉高棨, 徐信芯. 基于dropout-MC递归神经网络的锂电池剩余寿命预测[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(3): 541-549.
[15]	朱艳, 谢忠志, 于雯, 李曙生, 张逊. 低光照环境下基于面部特征点的疲劳驾驶检测技术[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 282-289.