汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 378-385.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2022.02.019
收稿日期:2022-01-26
修回日期:2022-03-06
出版日期:2022-06-30
发布日期:2022-07-01
通讯作者:
罗仁宏
作者简介:*罗仁宏(1989—),男(汉),湖北,工程师。E-mail: 15171391539@qq.com。基金资助:
ZHOU Donghui1(
), LUO Renhong2,*(
), WANG Zhifeng3
Received:2022-01-26
Revised:2022-03-06
Online:2022-06-30
Published:2022-07-01
Contact:
LUO Renhong
摘要:
为了改善某商用车发动机出水温度和整车风阻,提出了一种对发动机前舱冷却模块位置参数化研究方法。联合一维和三维计算平台建立了样车发动机舱计算模型,基于计算模型对以发动机舱内中冷器、散热器、冷却风扇和发动机本体之间距离为优化变量的四因素四水平正交试验进行发动机出水温度和整车风阻因数计算,利用极差法对正交试验结果进行分析得到各因素、各水平对发动机冷却效果和机舱气动阻力影响主次关系,从而确定最优组合方案。结果表明:最优方案相比原始发动机出水温度下降了2.3 ℃,比原始风阻因数降低了9.03,该优化方法能有效降低发动机出水温度和整车风阻。
中图分类号:
周东辉, 罗仁宏, 王之丰. 某商用车发动机舱冷却模块布局优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 378-385.
ZHOU Donghui, LUO Renhong, WANG Zhifeng. Layout optimization of cooling modules in a commercial vehicle engine compartment[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(2): 378-385.
| 中冷器 | 散热器 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| v / (m·s-1) | Δp / Pa | v / (m·s-1) | Δp / Pa |
| 2.52 | 113.57 | 5.24 | 63.57 |
| 3.75 | 201.43 | 7.91 | 119.10 |
| 5.01 | 319.03 | 10.55 | 206.89 |
| 6.28 | 483.86 | 13.14 | 321.60 |
| 中冷器 | 散热器 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| v / (m·s-1) | Δp / Pa | v / (m·s-1) | Δp / Pa |
| 2.52 | 113.57 | 5.24 | 63.57 |
| 3.75 | 201.43 | 7.91 | 119.10 |
| 5.01 | 319.03 | 10.55 | 206.89 |
| 6.28 | 483.86 | 13.14 | 321.60 |
| 正交试验序号 | 因素 | 响应目标值 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | θout / ℃ | Cd | |
| 1 | 50 | 10 | - 20 | 0 | 89.95 | 457.61 |
| 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90.35 | 460.12 |
| 3 | 50 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 90.42 | 459.60 |
| 4 | 50 | -5 | 40 | 30 | 90.75 | 455.03 |
| 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 91.65 | 456.41 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | - 20 | 30 | 90.15 | 458.36 |
| 7 | 0 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 91.35 | 457.10 |
| 8 | 0 | - 5 | 20 | 10 | 91.78 | 455.63 |
| 9 | - 50 | - 5 | 20 | 30 | 91.45 | 458.44 |
| 10 | - 50 | 0 | - 20 | 20 | 90.15 | 460.85 |
| 11 | - 50 | 5 | 40 | 10 | 90.68 | 464.37 |
| 12 | - 50 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 90.93 | 458.18 |
| 13 | - 100 | - 5 | - 20 | 10 | 89.81 | 466.49 |
| 14 | - 100 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 90.41 | 459.71 |
| 15 | - 100 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 90.11 | 453.52 |
| 16 | - 100 | 10 | 40 | 20 | 90.31 | 462.24 |
| 正交试验序号 | 因素 | 响应目标值 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | θout / ℃ | Cd | |
| 1 | 50 | 10 | - 20 | 0 | 89.95 | 457.61 |
| 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 90.35 | 460.12 |
| 3 | 50 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 90.42 | 459.60 |
| 4 | 50 | -5 | 40 | 30 | 90.75 | 455.03 |
| 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 91.65 | 456.41 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | - 20 | 30 | 90.15 | 458.36 |
| 7 | 0 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 91.35 | 457.10 |
| 8 | 0 | - 5 | 20 | 10 | 91.78 | 455.63 |
| 9 | - 50 | - 5 | 20 | 30 | 91.45 | 458.44 |
| 10 | - 50 | 0 | - 20 | 20 | 90.15 | 460.85 |
| 11 | - 50 | 5 | 40 | 10 | 90.68 | 464.37 |
| 12 | - 50 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 90.93 | 458.18 |
| 13 | - 100 | - 5 | - 20 | 10 | 89.81 | 466.49 |
| 14 | - 100 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 90.41 | 459.71 |
| 15 | - 100 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 90.11 | 453.52 |
| 16 | - 100 | 10 | 40 | 20 | 90.31 | 462.24 |
| 极差分析 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 90.368 | 90.948 | 90.015 | 90.660 |
| k2 | 91.233 | 90.265 | 90.760 | 90.655 |
| k3 | 90.803 | 90.640 | 91.015 | 90.633 |
| k4 | 90.160 | 90.710 | 90.773 | 90.615 |
| R | 1.072 | 0.683 | 1.000 | 0.045 |
| 主次因素(从大到小) | D1、 D3、 D2、 D4 | |||
| 极差分析 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 90.368 | 90.948 | 90.015 | 90.660 |
| k2 | 91.233 | 90.265 | 90.760 | 90.655 |
| k3 | 90.803 | 90.640 | 91.015 | 90.633 |
| k4 | 90.160 | 90.710 | 90.773 | 90.615 |
| R | 1.072 | 0.683 | 1.000 | 0.045 |
| 主次因素(从大到小) | D1、 D3、 D2、 D4 | |||
| 极差分析 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 458.090 | 458.898 | 460.828 | 458.150 |
| k2 | 456.875 | 459.760 | 457.058 | 461.653 |
| k3 | 460.460 | 458.648 | 458.345 | 459.775 |
| k4 | 460.490 | 458.610 | 459.685 | 456.338 |
| R | 3. 615 | 1. 150 | 3. 770 | 5. 315 |
| 主次因素(从大到小) | D4、 D3、 D1、 D2 | |||
| 极差分析 | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k1 | 458.090 | 458.898 | 460.828 | 458.150 |
| k2 | 456.875 | 459.760 | 457.058 | 461.653 |
| k3 | 460.460 | 458.648 | 458.345 | 459.775 |
| k4 | 460.490 | 458.610 | 459.685 | 456.338 |
| R | 3. 615 | 1. 150 | 3. 770 | 5. 315 |
| 主次因素(从大到小) | D4、 D3、 D1、 D2 | |||
| 响应目标 | 因素 | SS | DFi | σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发动机出水温度,θout | D1 | 2.73 | 3.00 | 0.909 |
| D2 | 0.96 | 3.00 | 0.320 | |
| D3 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 0.751 | |
| D4 | 0.01 | 3.00 | 0.002 | |
| e | 0.95 | 3.00 | 0.317 | |
| 整车风阻因数,Cd | D1 | 38.77 | 3.00 | 12.92 |
| D2 | 3.45 | 3.00 | 1.15 | |
| D3 | 32.04 | 3.00 | 10.68 | |
| D4 | 61.78 | 3.00 | 20.59 | |
| e | 4.91 | 3.00 | 1. 64 |
| 响应目标 | 因素 | SS | DFi | σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发动机出水温度,θout | D1 | 2.73 | 3.00 | 0.909 |
| D2 | 0.96 | 3.00 | 0.320 | |
| D3 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 0.751 | |
| D4 | 0.01 | 3.00 | 0.002 | |
| e | 0.95 | 3.00 | 0.317 | |
| 整车风阻因数,Cd | D1 | 38.77 | 3.00 | 12.92 |
| D2 | 3.45 | 3.00 | 1.15 | |
| D3 | 32.04 | 3.00 | 10.68 | |
| D4 | 61.78 | 3.00 | 20.59 | |
| e | 4.91 | 3.00 | 1. 64 |
| [1] | Ha S J, Chun U, Park J Y, et al. Enhancement of aerodynamic performance through high pressure relief in the engine room for passenger car using CFD technique[J]. Int’l J Autom Tech, 2017, 18(5): 779-784. |
| [2] | Kumar V, Sachin A. Underhood thermal simulation of a small passenger vehicle with rear engine compartment to evaluate and enhance radiator performance[R]. SAE Paper, 2010-01-0801. |
| [3] | 袁志群, 谷正气, 方遒. 基于冷却系统数值模型的发动机舱流动阻力特性研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(4): 474-478. |
| YUAN Zhiqun, GU Zhengqi, FANG Qiu, et al. Study on drag characteristics for flow field of underhand based on numerical model of cooling system[J]. Chin Mech Engi, 2011(4): 474-478. (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | 罗仁宏, 郭建忠, 胡溧. 某商用车发动机舱散热性能的提升与试验研究[J]. 制造业自动化, 2015, 37(4):88-91. |
| LUO Renhong, GUO Jianzhong, HU Su. Heat dissipation improvement and test of a commercial vehicle engine compartment[J]. Manufact Autom, 2015, 37(4): 88-91. (in Chinese) | |
| [5] | 张毅, 陆国栋, 俞小莉. 商用车多风扇冷却模块匹配研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2014, 36(5): 552-555+565. |
| ZHANG Yi, LU Guodong, YU Xiaoli. Research on the matching of multi-fan cooling modules for commercial vehicles[J]. Autom Engi, 2014, 36(5): 552-555+5650. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] | 郭建忠, 罗仁宏, 王之丰. 商用车发动机舱热管理一维/三维联合仿真与试验[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(4):526-530. |
| GUO Jianzhong, LUO Renhong, WANG Zhifeng. Test and 1D/3D co-simulation of thermal management for a commercial vehicle engine compartment[J]. Chin Mech Engi, 2016, 27(4): 526-530. (in Chinese) | |
| [7] | YANG Zhigang, Bozeman J, Shen F Z. CFRM concept at vehicle idle conditions[R]. SAE Paper, 2003-01-0613. |
| [8] | Taylor D, Chu A. Wind tunnel investigation of the effects of installation parameters on truck cooling system performance[R]. SAE Paper, 760832. |
| [9] | Costae A. CFD approach on underhood thermal management of passenger cars and trucks[R]. SAE Tech Papers,2003-01-3577. |
| [10] | Chougule S S, Sahu S K. Thermal performance of automobile radiator using carbon nanotube water nanofluid experimental study[J]. J Therm Sci Engi Appl, 2014, 6(4): 041009. |
| [11] |
Nunez C M, Klitzman S, Goodman A. Lead exposure among automobile radiator repair workers and their children in New York City[J]. Am J Ind Med, 2010, 23(5): 763-777.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700230510 URL |
| [12] | 王东, 黄晓, 肖露. 风扇导流罩对汽车冷却模块流动性能的影响[J]. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 38(3): 260-266. |
| WANG Dong, HUANG Xiao, XIAO Lu. The influence of fan shroud on the flow performance of automobile cooling module[J]. J Jiangsu Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 38(3): 260-266. (in Chinese) | |
| [13] | 陈飞, 罗仁宏. 基于模型预测控制的水冷型燃料电池冷却系统研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2021(7): 8-13. |
| CHEN Fei, LUO Renhong. Research on water-cooled fuel cell cooling system based on model predictive control[J]. Autom Tech, 2021(7): 8-13. (in Chinese) | |
| [14] | Larson R C. Experimental investigation of adverse wind effects on air cooled condensers: Wind tunnel testing on a model power plant[J]. Dissertations & Theses-Gradworks, 2014, 12: 1149-1155. |
| [15] | Hörmann T, Lechner B, Puntigam W. Numerical and experimental investigation of flow and temperature fields around automotive cooling systems[R]. SAE Paper, 2005-01-2006. |
| [16] | 任露泉. 试验设计及其优化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 68-79. |
| REN Luquan. Experimental Design and Optimization[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009: 68-79. (in Chinese) | |
| [17] |
ZHOU Shengqi, ZHOU Luowei, YU Litao, et al. Monitoring chip fatigue in an IGBT module based on grey relational analysis[J]. Microelect Reliab, 2016, 56: 49-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.10.027 URL |
| [18] | Jarrett A, Kim I Y. Design optimization of electric vehicle battery cooling plates for thermal performance[J]. J Power Sources, 2011, 196(23) : 359-10368. |
| [19] | Young S C. China to give stimulus for development of electric vehicles[N]. Bloomberg News,2012-12-24. |
| [20] |
LIU Rui, CHEN Jixin, XUN Jingzhi, et al. Numerical investigation of thermal behaviors in lithium-ion battery stack discharge[J]. Appl Energ, 2014, 132(11): 288-297.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.024 URL |
| [21] |
CHEN Defen, JIANG Jiuchun, Kim G H, et al. Comparison of different cooling methods for lithium ion battery cell[J]. Appl Therm Eng, 2016, 94: 846-854.
doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.015 URL |
| [22] | 徐晓明. 电动汽车冷却系统热流场的协同分析与液冷关键问题研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2012. |
| XU Xiaoming. Research on the thermal flow field synergy of electric vehicle cooling system and the key problems of liquid cooling[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Univ Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012. (in Chinese) | |
| [23] | 童高鹏, 甘伟, 李志伟, 等. 外后视镜全景镜头位置对汽车气动特性的影响研究[J]. 机械强度, 2018, 40(4): 1007-1011. |
| TONG Gaopeng, GAN Wei, LI Zhiwei, et al. Ourside rear view mirror panoramic camera position on the aerodynamic characteristic of impact study[D]. J Mech Streng, 2018, 40(4): 1007-1011. (in Chinese) | |
| [24] |
HONG Jichao, WANG Zhenpo, YAO Yongtao. Fault prognosis of battery system based on accurate voltage abnormity prognosis using long short-term memory neural networks[J]. Appl Energ, 2019, 251: 113381.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113381 URL |
| [1] | 屈贤, 余烽, 张金龙. 阶背车尾部结构对尾流场气动特性影响的仿真分析[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(3): 314-321. |
| [2] | 刘 莹,杨 旭,乔 鑫. 发动机舱盖的多学科设计优化方法[J]. JASE, 2018, 9(4): 456-462. |
| [3] | 谢暴,陶其铭. 基于CFD 的汽车发动机舱热管理及优化[J]. JASE, 2016, 07(01): 115-122. |
| [4] | 韩勇,谢金萍,卢晓萍,王方,黄红武,水野幸治. 基于DOE 的儿童乘员约束系统约束路径优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2015, 6(03): 230-236. |
| [5] | 周云山,贾杰锋. 基于正交试验设计和多目标遗传算法的HEV 参数优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2014, 5(04): 324-330. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||