汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1): 52-61.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2021.01.005
收稿日期:2020-11-11
出版日期:2021-03-31
发布日期:2021-04-02
通讯作者:
杨林
作者简介:*杨林,教授。E-mail: yanglin@sjtu.edu.cn。基金资助:
DU Mao(
), YANG Lin*(
), JIN Yue, TU Jiayu
Received:2020-11-11
Online:2021-03-31
Published:2021-04-02
Contact:
YANG Lin
摘要:
为降低混合动力汽车(HEV)的出行时间和出行能耗,提出了一种基于时空动态交通信息的路径规划算法。分析了影响车辆通行时间和全程最低能耗的因素。一种基于广义回归网络 (GRNN)模型,拟合计算了道路通行时间以及整体路径的全程能耗。构建了基于并行A*算法的车辆路径规划算法,为确定起终点位置后的车辆,规划了一条耗时更短、 更加节能的路径。进行了仿真对比试验。结果表明:相比于依据平均车速与道路功率的计算方法,该算法能够获得更优的出行路径,可降低车辆能耗11%以上,缩短行车时间13%以上。因而,该算法可为车辆规划更优的路径。
中图分类号:
杜茂, 杨林, 金悦, 涂家毓. 基于交通时空特征的车辆全局路径规划算法[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(1): 52-61.
DU Mao, YANG Lin, JIN Yue, TU Jiayu. Vehicle global path planning algorithm based on spatio-temporal characteristics of traffic[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2021, 12(1): 52-61.
| 平均车速 | -0.42 | |
|---|---|---|
| 车辆密度 | ρi,t | 0.64 |
| 道路长度 | li | 0.18 |
| 非绿灯的时长 | ri,t | 0.08 |
| 路口长度 | γi | 0.11 |
| 通行功率 | ēi,t | -0.38 |
| 预估通行时长 | τi, t | 0.18 |
| 下一道路j的平均车速 | vj,t' | -0.29 |
| 下一道路j的车辆密度 | ρj,t' | 0.51 |
| 绿灯时长 | ji,t | -0.1 |
| 平均车速 | -0.42 | |
|---|---|---|
| 车辆密度 | ρi,t | 0.64 |
| 道路长度 | li | 0.18 |
| 非绿灯的时长 | ri,t | 0.08 |
| 路口长度 | γi | 0.11 |
| 通行功率 | ēi,t | -0.38 |
| 预估通行时长 | τi, t | 0.18 |
| 下一道路j的平均车速 | vj,t' | -0.29 |
| 下一道路j的车辆密度 | ρj,t' | 0.51 |
| 绿灯时长 | ji,t | -0.1 |
| ID | ρi,t | li | ri,t | gi,t | τi, t | ēi,t | ρj,t' | γi | RE/% | MAE/s | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 10.39 | 2.95 |
| 2 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.66 | 2.59 | ||
| 3 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.60 | 2.51 | |||
| 4 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.97 | 2.65 | ||||
| 5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.97 | 2.66 | |||||
| 6 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 9.68 | 2.78 | |||
| 7 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 10.01 | 2.87 | ||
| 8 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.71 | 2.64 |
| ID | ρi,t | li | ri,t | gi,t | τi, t | ēi,t | ρj,t' | γi | RE/% | MAE/s | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 10.39 | 2.95 |
| 2 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.66 | 2.59 | ||
| 3 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.60 | 2.51 | |||
| 4 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.97 | 2.65 | ||||
| 5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.97 | 2.66 | |||||
| 6 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 9.68 | 2.78 | |||
| 7 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 10.01 | 2.87 | ||
| 8 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 8.71 | 2.64 |
| 关联性 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DP油耗 | 参数1 | 参数2 | 参数3 | 参数4 | 参数5 | 参数6 | 参数7 | 参数8 | |
| DP油耗 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 0.44 | 0.66 | -0.37 | 0.58 | 0.34 | -0.46 |
| 参数1 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.30 | 0.83 | -0.16 | 0.46 | 0.18 | -0.25 |
| 参数2 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.62 | -0.37 | 0.75 | 0.51 | -0.49 |
| 参数3 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.61 | 1.00 | -0.14 | -0.57 | 0.80 | 0.86 | -0.73 |
| 参数4 | 0.66 | 0.83 | 0.62 | -0.14 | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.06 | -0.22 | 0.28 |
| 参数5 | -0.37 | -0.16 | -0.37 | -0.57 | 0.35 | 1.00 | -0.64 | -0.68 | 0.95 |
| 参数6 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.06 | -0.64 | 1.00 | 0.92 | -0.69 |
| 参数7 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 0.86 | -0.22 | -0.68 | 0.92 | 1.00 | -0.73 |
| 参数8 | -0.46 | -0.25 | -0.49 | -0.73 | 0.28 | 0.95 | -0.69 | -0.73 | 1.00 |
| 关联性 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DP油耗 | 参数1 | 参数2 | 参数3 | 参数4 | 参数5 | 参数6 | 参数7 | 参数8 | |
| DP油耗 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 0.44 | 0.66 | -0.37 | 0.58 | 0.34 | -0.46 |
| 参数1 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.30 | 0.83 | -0.16 | 0.46 | 0.18 | -0.25 |
| 参数2 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.62 | -0.37 | 0.75 | 0.51 | -0.49 |
| 参数3 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.61 | 1.00 | -0.14 | -0.57 | 0.80 | 0.86 | -0.73 |
| 参数4 | 0.66 | 0.83 | 0.62 | -0.14 | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.06 | -0.22 | 0.28 |
| 参数5 | -0.37 | -0.16 | -0.37 | -0.57 | 0.35 | 1.00 | -0.64 | -0.68 | 0.95 |
| 参数6 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.06 | -0.64 | 1.00 | 0.92 | -0.69 |
| 参数7 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 0.86 | -0.22 | -0.68 | 0.92 | 1.00 | -0.73 |
| 参数8 | -0.46 | -0.25 | -0.49 | -0.73 | 0.28 | 0.95 | -0.69 | -0.73 | 1.00 |
| ε / % | 能耗下降/% | 行程时间下降/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 相比算法1 | 相比算法2 | 相比算法1 | 相比算法2 | ||
| 0 | 10.48 | 13.96 | 14.49 | 16.12 | |
| 10 | 11.25 | 13.55 | 12.86 | 14.69 | |
| 15 | 8.76 | 10.57 | 13.63 | 16.71 | |
| 20 | 15.16 | 16.42 | 13.65 | 14.02 | |
| 平均 | 11.41 | 13.63 | 13.66 | 15.39 | |
| ε / % | 能耗下降/% | 行程时间下降/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 相比算法1 | 相比算法2 | 相比算法1 | 相比算法2 | ||
| 0 | 10.48 | 13.96 | 14.49 | 16.12 | |
| 10 | 11.25 | 13.55 | 12.86 | 14.69 | |
| 15 | 8.76 | 10.57 | 13.63 | 16.71 | |
| 20 | 15.16 | 16.42 | 13.65 | 14.02 | |
| 平均 | 11.41 | 13.63 | 13.66 | 15.39 | |
| [1] | 李阳. 需求不确定的车辆路径问题模型与算法研究[D]. 大连:大连海事大学, 2018. |
| LI Yang. Optimization models and algorithms of vehicle routing problem under uncertain demands[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2018. (in Chinese) | |
| [2] | SONG Meixian, LI Junqing, HAN Yunqi, et al. Metaheuristics for solving the vehicle routing problem with the time windows and energy consumption in cold chain logistics[J]. Appl Soft Computing, 2020,95:178-190. |
| [3] | Karakatič S. Optimizing nonlinear charging times of electric vehicle routing with genetic algorithm[J]. Expert Sys Appl, 2021,164:356-371. |
| [4] | Losa J, Schulte F Spaan M T J, et al. The value of information sharing for platform-based collaborative vehicle routing[J]. Transp Res Part E: Logistics Transp Rev, 2020,141:145-160. |
| [5] | 张照生. 交通约束下的行车最优路径规划[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2013. |
| ZHANG Zhaosheng. Optimum vehicular path planning under traffic restriction[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2013. (in Chinese) | |
| [6] | CHEN Dawei, PAN Shuangli, CHEN Qun, et al. Vehicle routing problem of contactless joint distribution service during COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Transp Res Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2020,8:225-241. |
| [7] | Gmira M, Gendreau M, Lodi A, Potvin J Y. Tabu search for the time-dependent vehicle routing problem with time windows on a road network[J]. Euro J Operational Res, 2021,288:129-140. |
| [8] | Stellingwerf H, Groeneveld L, Laporte G, et al. The quality-driven vehicle routing problem: Model and application to a case of cooperative logistics[J]. Int’l J Production Economics, 2020,231:107-122. |
| [9] | LU Ji, CHEN Yuning, HAO Jinkao, HE Renjie. The time-dependent electric vehicle routing problem: Model and solution[J]. Expert Syst Appl, 2020,61:331-346. |
| [10] | 张静. 面向路径规划的导航路网数据模型研究[D]. 北京:中国矿业大学, 2009. |
| ZHANG Jing. Research on navigation network data model for route planning[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology, 2009. (in Chinese) | |
| [11] | 杨易. 智能车辆组合定位与路径导航技术研究[D]. 长沙:湖南大学, 2006. |
| YANG Yi. Research on technologies of intelligent vehicle integrated location and route navigation[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2006. ( in Chinese) | |
| [12] | CHEN Ning, ZHANG Yun. Energy consumption model of urban transportation based on road network capacity[C]// Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Eng Conf, Chengdu, China, 2010,1:1-4. |
| [13] | Ranacher P, Brunauer R, van der Spek S, et al. A model to estimate and interpret the energy-efficiency of movement patterns in urban road traffic[J]. Computers, Envi Urban Syst, 2016,59:152-163. |
| [14] | GUO Chenjuan, YANG Bin, Andersen O, et al. EcoMark 2.0: Empowering eco-routing with vehicular environmental models and actual vehicle fuel consumption data[J]. Geoinfo, 2015,19:567-599. |
| [15] | Kropiwnicki J. A unified approach to the analysis of electric energy and fuel consumption of cars in city traffic[J]. Energy, 2019,182:1045-1057. |
| [16] | LIU Chenglin, WANG Jianqiang, CAI Wenjuan, et al. An energy-efficient dynamic route optimization algorithm for connected and automated vehicles using velocity-space-time networks[J]. IEEE Access, 2019,7:108866-108877. |
| [17] | Krajzewicz D, Erdmann J, Behrisch M, et al. Recent development and applications of SUMO - simulation of urban mobility[J]. Int’l J Adv Syst Meas, 2012,5:128-138. |
| [18] | Celtek S A, Durdu A, Alı M E M. Real-time traffic signal control with swarm optimization methods[J] Measurement, 2020,166:108-122. |
| [19] | San José R, Pérez J L, Gonzalez-Barras R M. Assessment of mesoscale and microscale simulations of a NO2 episode supported by traffic modelling at microscopic level[J]. Sci Total Envir, 2021,752:141-160. |
| [20] | ZHANG Zhengchao, LI Meng, LIN Xi, et al. Multistep speed prediction on traffic networks: A graph convolutional sequence-to-sequence learning approach with attention mechanism[J]. Transp Res Part C: Emerging Tech, 2019,105:297-322. |
| [21] | ZHOU Wei, YANG Lin, CAI Yishan, et al. Dynamic programming for new energy vehicles based on their work modes part I: Electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles[J]. J Power Sources, 2018,406:151-166. |
| [1] | 李耀华、范吉康、刘洋、何杰、李泽田、潘绍飞. 自适应双时域参数MPC的智能车辆路径规划与跟踪控制[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(4): 528-539. |
| [2] | 刘建辉, 姚方方, 张彦. 混合动力汽车参数的交叉—变异蜂群算法优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(2): 186-192. |
| [3] | 邓涛, 罗远平 . 基于驾驶意图云模型识别的混合动力汽车 A-ECMS 的构建 [J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3): 305-313. |
| [4] | 李国法,陈耀昱,吕辰, 陶达,曹东璞,成波 . 智能汽车决策中的驾驶行为语义解析关键技术[J]. JASE, 2019, 10(4): 391-412. |
| [5] | 李学鋆. 基于UTMD 的汽车自动驾驶的路径规划寻优算法[J]. JASE, 2018, 9(4): 449-455. |
| [6] | 孙起春,王军华,郭洪江,赵永强. 某插电式混合动力汽车动力系统的模式切换过程分析[J]. JASE, 2018, 9(01): 79-84. |
| [7] | 魏祥民, 严明月, 汪䶮, 等. 基于路面识别的汽车紧急避撞控制算法[J]. JASE, 2017, 08(04): 359-366. |
| [8] | 朱西产,刘智超,李霖. 基于车辆与行人危险工况的转向避撞控制策略[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2015, 6(03): 217-223. |
| [9] | 谢溪凌,肖建波,张 昊,谭玉莹,倪明安,刘 阳,张志富,郑卫刚. 考虑时段交通流交通灯工作状态的智能优化[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2012, 3(3): 251-256. |
| [10] | 邓滨, 王震台, 杨济匡, 孔春玉. 中国和瑞典城市行人事故形态对比研究[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2010, 1(3): 190-194. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||