汽车安全与节能学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 368-377.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2022.02.018
收稿日期:
2021-12-10
修回日期:
2022-02-19
出版日期:
2022-06-30
发布日期:
2022-07-01
作者简介:
张甫仁 (1975—),男 (汉),四川,教授。E-mail: zh_feixue@163.com。基金资助:
ZHANG Furen(), LU Fu(), WU Bo, XIAO Kang
Received:
2021-12-10
Revised:
2022-02-19
Online:
2022-06-30
Published:
2022-07-01
摘要:
为了优化电池组的冷却性能,提出了一种均匀直通道与阵列翅片相结合的液冷板设计。基于计算流体动力学(CFD)的评估方法对模型进行冷却性能分析和优化,在5 C放电工况下,研究对液冷板内部不同的通道与阵列翅片组合形式、进出口宽度、翅片大小和上下冷却槽间距对电池热管理的影响。结果表明:中间使用翅片、两侧使用通道可以改变最高温度、平均温度和温差,改变进出口宽度可以显著改变进出口压降。与原始模型相比,质量流量为0.5 g/s时,优化模型满足最高温度为39.99 ℃,平均温度降低0.93 ℃,同时温度标准差和进出口压降分别降低0.09 ℃和494.68 Pa;冷却液质量流量对液冷板散热性能有一定程度的影响。
中图分类号:
张甫仁, 鲁福, 吴博, 肖康. 内部结构组合形式优化对冷板冷却性能的影响[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(2): 368-377.
ZHANG Furen, LU Fu, WU Bo, XIAO Kang. Effect of internal structure combination optimization on cooling performance of cold plate[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2022, 13(2): 368-377.
实验设备 | 数值范围 | 精度 |
---|---|---|
蠕动泵 | 0~550 mL / min | ± 5 % |
数据采集仪 | - 200~600 ℃ | ± 0.2 % FS |
恒温箱 | 0~ 60 ℃ | ± 0.5 ℃ |
温度传感器 | - 50~260 ℃ | ± 0.15 ℃ |
流量计 | - 20~120 ℃; 16~160 mL / min | ± 2.5 % |
直流电源 | 0 ~100 V; 0~3 A | 0.1 % +5 mV; 0.1 % +10 mA |
实验设备 | 数值范围 | 精度 |
---|---|---|
蠕动泵 | 0~550 mL / min | ± 5 % |
数据采集仪 | - 200~600 ℃ | ± 0.2 % FS |
恒温箱 | 0~ 60 ℃ | ± 0.5 ℃ |
温度传感器 | - 50~260 ℃ | ± 0.15 ℃ |
流量计 | - 20~120 ℃; 16~160 mL / min | ± 2.5 % |
直流电源 | 0 ~100 V; 0~3 A | 0.1 % +5 mV; 0.1 % +10 mA |
样本 | N | d mm | D mm | H mm | l mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
2 | 0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
3 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
4 | 0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
5 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
6 | 2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
7 | 2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
8 | 2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 |
9 | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
10 | 2 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
11 | 4 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 |
12 | 4 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
13 | 4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
14 | 4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
15 | 4 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
16 | 6 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 |
17 | 6 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
18 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
19 | 6 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
20 | 6 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
21 | 8 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
22 | 8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
23 | 8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 |
24 | 8 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
25 | 8 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
样本 | N | d mm | D mm | H mm | l mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
2 | 0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
3 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
4 | 0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
5 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
6 | 2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
7 | 2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
8 | 2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 |
9 | 2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
10 | 2 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
11 | 4 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 |
12 | 4 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
13 | 4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
14 | 4 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
15 | 4 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
16 | 6 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 |
17 | 6 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
18 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
19 | 6 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
20 | 6 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
21 | 8 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
22 | 8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
23 | 8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 |
24 | 8 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
25 | 8 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
样本 | θmax ℃ | θave ℃ | Δθ ℃ | Δp kPa |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 40.06 | 34.26 | 3.86 | 1.052 |
2 | 40.32 | 34.31 | 3.86 | 0.784 |
3 | 40.40 | 34.55 | 3.54 | 0.721 |
4 | 40.49 | 34.70 | 3.36 | 0.699 |
5 | 40.49 | 34.72 | 3.29 | 0.693 |
6 | 40.44 | 34.25 | 3.86 | 0.725 |
7 | 40.44 | 34.63 | 3.39 | 0.696 |
8 | 40.57 | 34.78 | 3.38 | 0.699 |
9 | 40.08 | 34.53 | 3.89 | 0.891 |
10 | 40.00 | 34.17 | 3.88 | 0.756 |
11 | 40.67 | 34.92 | 3.27 | 0.702 |
12 | 40.00 | 34.31 | 3.86 | 0.954 |
13 | 40.02 | 34.20 | 3.85 | 0.756 |
14 | 40.09 | 34.03 | 3.96 | 0.713 |
15 | 40.35 | 34.55 | 3.50 | 0.697 |
16 | 40.76 | 34.64 | 3.69 | 0.800 |
17 | 40.73 | 34.78 | 3.59 | 0.739 |
18 | 40.28 | 34.16 | 3.88 | 0.702 |
19 | 40.48 | 34.65 | 3.40 | 0.695 |
20 | 41.37 | 35.49 | 3.31 | 0.735 |
21 | 41.37 | 35.49 | 3.31 | 0.735 |
22 | 40.46 | 34.17 | 3.86 | 0.692 |
23 | 40.12 | 34.41 | 3.92 | 0.803 |
24 | 39.97 | 34.15 | 3.88 | 0.728 |
25 | 40.24 | 34.40 | 3.69 | 0.712 |
样本 | θmax ℃ | θave ℃ | Δθ ℃ | Δp kPa |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 40.06 | 34.26 | 3.86 | 1.052 |
2 | 40.32 | 34.31 | 3.86 | 0.784 |
3 | 40.40 | 34.55 | 3.54 | 0.721 |
4 | 40.49 | 34.70 | 3.36 | 0.699 |
5 | 40.49 | 34.72 | 3.29 | 0.693 |
6 | 40.44 | 34.25 | 3.86 | 0.725 |
7 | 40.44 | 34.63 | 3.39 | 0.696 |
8 | 40.57 | 34.78 | 3.38 | 0.699 |
9 | 40.08 | 34.53 | 3.89 | 0.891 |
10 | 40.00 | 34.17 | 3.88 | 0.756 |
11 | 40.67 | 34.92 | 3.27 | 0.702 |
12 | 40.00 | 34.31 | 3.86 | 0.954 |
13 | 40.02 | 34.20 | 3.85 | 0.756 |
14 | 40.09 | 34.03 | 3.96 | 0.713 |
15 | 40.35 | 34.55 | 3.50 | 0.697 |
16 | 40.76 | 34.64 | 3.69 | 0.800 |
17 | 40.73 | 34.78 | 3.59 | 0.739 |
18 | 40.28 | 34.16 | 3.88 | 0.702 |
19 | 40.48 | 34.65 | 3.40 | 0.695 |
20 | 41.37 | 35.49 | 3.31 | 0.735 |
21 | 41.37 | 35.49 | 3.31 | 0.735 |
22 | 40.46 | 34.17 | 3.86 | 0.692 |
23 | 40.12 | 34.41 | 3.92 | 0.803 |
24 | 39.97 | 34.15 | 3.88 | 0.728 |
25 | 40.24 | 34.40 | 3.69 | 0.712 |
指标 | 最优结果 | 优先级(从大到小) |
---|---|---|
θmax | N4d2D0.5H1l1(A型) | N 、 d 、 D 、 H 、 l |
θave | N4d2D0.5H1l1(A型) | D 、 H 、 N 、 d 、 l |
Δθ | N6d2.5D1.5H2.5l1.5 (B型) | D 、 H 、 N 、 l 、 d |
Δp | N8d2.5D1.5H2.5l1.5 (C型) | H 、 d 、 D 、 l 、 N |
指标 | 最优结果 | 优先级(从大到小) |
---|---|---|
θmax | N4d2D0.5H1l1(A型) | N 、 d 、 D 、 H 、 l |
θave | N4d2D0.5H1l1(A型) | D 、 H 、 N 、 d 、 l |
Δθ | N6d2.5D1.5H2.5l1.5 (B型) | D 、 H 、 N 、 l 、 d |
Δp | N8d2.5D1.5H2.5l1.5 (C型) | H 、 d 、 D 、 l 、 N |
[1] |
DU Jiuyu, OUOYANG Danhua. Progress of Chinese electric vehicles industrialization in 2015: A review[J]. Appl Energy, 2017, 188: 529-546.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.129 URL |
[2] |
Cicconi P, Landi D, Germani M. Thermal analysis and simulation of Li-ion battery pack for a lightweight commercial EV[J]. Appl Energy, 2017, 192: 159-177.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.008 URL |
[3] |
Coman P, Darcy E, Veje C, et al. Numerical analysis of heat propagation in a battery pack using a novel technology for triggering thermal runaway[J]. Appl Energy, 2017, 203: 189-200.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.033 URL |
[4] |
Park H. A design of air flow configuration for cooling lithium ion battery in hybrid electric vehicles[J]. J Power Sources, 2013, 239: 30-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.102 URL |
[5] | NA Xiaoyu, KANG Huifang, WANG Teng, et al. Reverse layered air flow for Li-ion battery thermal management[J]. Appl Therm Engi, 2018, 143: 257-262. |
[6] | Beng S, Japar W. Numerical analysis of heat and fluid flow in microchannel heat sink with triangular cavities[J]. J Advan Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci, 2017, 1: 1-8. |
[7] | Jiaqiang E, XU Shijie, DENG Yuanwang, et al. Investiga-tion on thermal performance and pressure loss of the fluid cold-plate used in thermal management system of the battery pack[J]. Appl Therm Engi, 2018, 145: 552-568. |
[8] | ZHONG Guanjin, ZHANG Guoqing, YANG Xiaoqing, et al. Researches of composite phase change material cooling/resistance wire preheating coupling system of a designed 18650-type battery module[J]. Appl Therm Engi, 2017, 127: 176-183. |
[9] | Noie S. Heat transfer characteristics of a two-phase closed thermosiphon[J]. Appl Therm Engi, 2005, 25 (4): 495-506. |
[10] | Singh R, Akbarzadeh A, Mochizuki M. Operational characteristics of a miniature loop heat pipe with flate vaporator[J]. Int’l J Therm Sci, 2008, 47(11): 1504-1515. |
[11] | SONG Limin, ZHANG Hengyun, YANG Chun. Thermal analysis of conjugated cooling configurations using phase change material and liquid cooling techniques for a battery module[J]. Int’l J Heat Mass Trans, 2019, 133: 827-841. |
[12] |
RAO Zhonghao, WANG Shuangfeng, WU Maochun, et al. Experimental investigation on thermal management of electric vehicle battery with heat pipe[J]. Energ Conv Manag, 2013, 65: 92-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.08.014 URL |
[13] | Songkran W, Paisarn N. Liquid impingement cooling of cold plate heat sink with different fin configurations: high heat flux applications[J]. Int’l J Heat Mass Trans, 2019, 140: 281-292. |
[14] |
WU Weixiong, YANG Xiaoqing, ZHANG Guoqing, et al. Experimental investigation on the thermal performance of heat pipe-assisted phase change material based battery thermal management system[J]. Energ Conv Manag, 2017, 138: 486-492.
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.022 URL |
[15] |
HUO Yutao, RAO Zhonghao, LIU Xinjian, et al. Investigation of power battery thermal management by using mini-channel cold plate[J]. Energ Conv Manag, 2015, 89(1): 387-395.
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.10.015 URL |
[16] |
Jin W L, Lee S P, Kong X X, et al. Ultra-thin minichannel LCP for EV battery thermal management[J]. Appl Energy, 2014, 113(1): 1786-1794.
doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.013 URL |
[17] | SHI Xiaojun, LI Shan, MU Yingjie, et al. Geometry parameters optimization for a microchannel heat sink with secondary flow channel[J]. Int’l Commun Heat Mass Trans, 2019, 104(5): 89-100. |
[18] | SHENG Lei, SU Lin, ZHANG Hua, et al. Numerical investigation on a lithium ion battery thermal management utilizing a serpentine-channel liquid cooling plate exchanger[J]. Int’l J Heat Mass Trans, 2019, 141: 658-668. |
[19] |
Bernardi D, Pawlikowski E, Newman J. A general energy balance for battery systems[J]. J Electrochem Soc, 1985, 132 (1): 5-12.
doi: 10.1149/1.2113792 URL |
[20] |
ZHANG Furen, YI Mengfei, WANG Pengwei, et al. Optimization design for improving thermal performance of T-type air-cooled lithium-ion battery pack[J], J Energy Storage, 2021, 44: 103464.
doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103464 URL |
[21] | DENG Tao, RAN Yan, YIN Yanli, et al. Multi-objective optimization design of thermal management system for lithium-ion battery pack based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II[J]. Appl Therm Engi, 2020, 164: 114394. |
[1] | 陈友鹏, 张国庆, 秦启超, 覃卓庚, 邓坚, 李新喜. 电动汽车用柔性复合相变材料的电池热管理系统[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2022, 13(1): 168-175. |
[2] | 蔡森林, 魏名山, 宋盼盼, 魏洪革. 基于直流道液冷板的动力电池冷却性能仿真[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2021, 12(3): 380-385. |
[3] | 李平,安富强,张剑波,王浩然. 电动汽车用锂离子电池的温度敏感性研究综述[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2014, 5(03): 224-237. |
[4] | 袁昊, 王丽芳, 王立业. 基于液体冷却和加热的电动汽车热管理系统[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2012, 3(4): 371-380. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||